Speculation: Roster Building Thread VII (2019/2020)

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
  • We're expeting server maintenance on March 3rd starting at midnight, there may be downtime during the work.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I mean Andersson deserves it more. 1st in CF%, 1st in SF%, 1st in XGF% according to natural stat trick. He's done everything except score.
 
I mean Andersson deserves it more. 1st in CF%, 1st in SF%, 1st in XGF% according to natural stat trick. He's done everything except score.
He’s doing many positive things but it’d be a huge change in his ice-time and he’s losing most of his face-offs at the moment. He’ll pot a few a get his chance as 3C soon enough I think.

That said, people also clearly view Andersson differently than Howden on here so we might be getting carried away with how good he’s actually been. If Andersson instead was part of the McDonagh trade I doubt there’d be as much clamor.
 
Last edited:
I know its hard to fathom that a young player could get better after his rookie season but it does happen.
No need for the sarcasm, I've been one of the biggest supporters of our youngsters.

I really don't want to spend anymore time on Pionk as its kind of OT but being skeptical of one young player doesn't mean someone is a skeptic in general. That is kind of a ridiculous argument to make.
 
Would Gorton be interested in an Eric Staal reunion post AV? He could be available and would be a decent stop gap at 2C...

the only trade for a 2C that he should consider is another Zibanejad deal that brings in a guy that is 25 or younger that can be part of the long term solutions...we are better off losing and getting a high pick than bring in staal.
 
the only trade for a 2C that he should consider is another Zibanejad deal that brings in a guy that is 25 or younger that can be part of the long term solutions...we are better off losing and getting a high pick than bring in staal.

one reason I would resign Kreider and try to flip him down the road. i don't want any futures for Kreider unless another Mika type of future. can Kreider even bring a Mika type of player as an UFA or will he must be resigned to bring that Mika type of player in return.
 
i rather trade for Tyler Johnson. no thanks

Hands down, purely in terms of style, Tyler Johnson is a perfect fit for us.

Guys like Eric Staal can look good on paper, but for years he has been a negative contributor for his team. So easy to control and push back. Sure he is clutch and will put some pts on the PP and when getting top ice time. But if you play good hockey against his unit it’s just walk-over.
 
  • Like
Reactions: egelband
He’s doing many positive things but it’d be a huge change in his ice-time and he’s losing most of his face-offs at the moment. He’ll pot a few a get his chance as 3C soon enough I think.

That said, people also clearly view Andersson differently than Howden on here so we might be getting carried away with how good he’s actually been. If Andersson instead was part of the McDonagh trade I doubt there’d be as much clamor.

I haven't seen much discussion of Howden's play venture into the McDonagh trade. I think people mostly don't think he's been an effective player.

I agree about Andersson though. No need to jump him so high so fast just when he's finally playing a mostly effective game.
 
I just hope the Rangers get some scoring from that 2nd line one way or another. Kreider's value won't be helped by a legitimate fall in production.

Eric Staal? Yeesh. Been there, done that.
 
Pionk just magically transformed into a good all around defenseman? I don't buy it. :dunno:

Not saying that he is perfect defensively and don’t have issues he has to work with — but I do think a great deal of the over the top trashing he got in NY was attributable to meaning less stats that failed to adjust for the big picture.

There are so many examples of players over night completely changing their metrical foot print when they change teams or even just roles on the team. Those stats can’t just be taken seriously when comparing a player in one situation with any player in another situation, which isn’t strange since hockey is a team game after all and it of course is tremendously hard to isolate one of six players on the ice’s contribution individually in a way that it tells you how good he would perform for another team with another system in another role.

Again, definitely not saying that Pionk handled the work load he got in NY well. But I definitely don’t think he was a worthless player which many concluded after corsi scouting him.
 
I haven't seen much discussion of Howden's play venture into the McDonagh trade. I think people mostly don't think he's been an effective player.

I agree about Andersson though. No need to jump him so high so fast just when he's finally playing a mostly effective game.
No but it’s only logical that people have a stronger emotional attachment to Andersson’s success and long-term future in the org. He was a high draft pick by the team, and was at the time the face of the future, future captain, etc. I mean people are dying for him to pan out, myself included.
 
We have completely different memories of Tom Poti.

I also want Skjei to be more in the mold of 'prime-MacTruck'... no where near Poti.

Poti was a pre-cursor to the modern NHL D, because despite the fact that he was gaffe prone, the puck was on the Rangers sticks an awful lot when he was out there. And even more so when his gaffe-proneness started to steady out after he was gone from the Rangers. He'd fit in VERY well in today's game.
 
No but it’s only logical that people have a stronger emotional attachment to Andersson’s success and long-term future in the org. He was a high draft pick by the team, and was at the time the face of the future, future captain, etc. I mean people are dying for him to pan out, myself included.

IDK. That's kind of revisionist since that same investment was manifesting in pitchforks until he cracked the roster this season. I can't think of many first round Rangers picks who haven't faced substantially more criticism than their less pedigreed peers. Del Zotto. Kreider. McIlrath. Miller. Skjei. I mean just read the old Andersson threads, the Chytil one when he got sent down, and Kravtsov's thread currently.
 
Poti was a pre-cursor to the modern NHL D, because despite the fact that he was gaffe prone, the puck was on the Rangers sticks an awful lot when he was out there. And even more so when his gaffe-proneness started to steady out after he was gone from the Rangers. He'd fit in VERY well in today's game.

Before a formula was used that spelled out:

No. of good plays * 1 — No. gaffs * 100 + No. big hits x 50 + No. big slippers x 50

Making mistakes is part of playing with smaller marginals and just making plays. Before the guys that just threw the puck away got a break for everything in Rangerland. If you made a mistake here and there and wasn’t physical, you got hated on pretty bad.

Now the formula is based on metrics only. Bad corsi=worst D in the NHL, good Corsi=future Norris candidate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheDirtyH
Would Gorton be interested in an Eric Staal reunion post AV? He could be available and would be a decent stop gap at 2C...
Everyone's gonna hate this idea for no reason but it makes a lot of sense.

The board's tendency to hate Eric more then Marc is so f***ing off the wall lol
 
Before a formula was used that spelled out:

No. of good plays * 1 — No. gaffs * 100 + No. big hits x 50 + No. big slippers x 50

Making mistakes is part of playing with smaller marginals and just making plays. Before the guys that just threw the puck away got a break for everything in Rangerland. If you made a mistake here and there and wasn’t physical, you got hated on pretty bad.

Now the formula is based on metrics only. Bad corsi=worst D in the NHL, good Corsi=future Norris candidate.

Rozy and Malik were victims of the same mindset.
 
No but it’s only logical that people have a stronger emotional attachment to Andersson’s success and long-term future in the org. He was a high draft pick by the team, and was at the time the face of the future, future captain, etc. I mean people are dying for him to pan out, myself included.
It's not as much that as it is Andersson in the miniscule amount of games and ice time has stood out and done more positive things on the ice than Howden, at least that's how I see it.

Draft pedigree or how the players ended up here doesn't make much difference in this situation
 
  • Like
Reactions: lucky13
Crazy idea here -- Jason Pominville is unemployed.

31 points and good underlying numbers. He's a vet and our bottom six is absolutely useless.
I would like it but I would guess he might be waiting for a better team than us to reach out to him if he still has the urge to play. But if he's willing to sign here we should
 
  • Like
Reactions: Machinehead
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad