Not that I would but is #2 even possible?
If we're listing things that have 0% chance of happening (like Option 2), why didn't Shapiro include:
Option 3:
Tarasenko signs with no one, wears Jimmy Vesey's jersey during games
Not that I would but is #2 even possible?
Who are the guys from Laf's draft class with no "draft stock" that have forced their way up a lineup over a Kreider and Panarin? As far as I can see, only Stutzle and Raymond have scored more than Laf in the NHL from that draft, both had "draft stock" and neither had to force anything. They were given elevated opportunity.Everyone has excuses for laffy. You look at other players that have no draft stock that force their way into and up a lineup. If laffy was doing that we wouldn't making excuses for him.
It's akin to all the excuses for kakko missing empty nets regularly, oops, I guess they left the dome open and the wind blew that shot wide of the net...
They should emulate Kreider's work ethic and see where that takes them. I'm not even saying they are lazy, I'm saying Kreider is a level above most in his off ice work.It's both though, but kids see what vets are and are not doing and follow suit. A lot of the issues w development here can be attributed to the org standards that exist with vets and what the kids see is acceptable.
Panarin and Kreider belong ahead of him but that’s where moving him to RW came into play.. He was playing well with Trocheck and Panarin there and then GG removed him from it. They didn’t have anyone who should be over him (on RW) at that time and no Goodrow/Vesey weren’t itSo which is it? He was demoted unjustly or he shouldnt be in that spot bc of the other two players ahead of him?
Good players find a way to impact a team. Laffy has been replacement level at times and we are three years in. He still gets on the ice. Do something to impact the game during your time instead of just being on the ice. Everyone in the NHL is suppose to stand out and impact a game. There are too many times he is just... There
If we're listing things that have 0% chance of happening (like Option 2), why didn't Shapiro include:
Option 3:
Tarasenko signs with no one, wears Jimmy Vesey's jersey during games
The truth is the Rangers have a 3 year window to win. (Panarin, Kreider, Shesty on his cheaper deal, etc). If we’re just going to waste Laf as a 3LW maybe they should trade him. There’s no magic pill to fix the LW situation any time soon. I’m not saying they “should” I’m saying something has to give.
Is Kane playing on the first unit PP again? That opportunity should go to someone else. The Rangers are playing the first 3 months of the regular season without Kane and here comes Kane who replaces a younger player on the PP.Well we only currently have 2 RWs, so idk where you're getting "not enough opportunities" from? Certainly you wont be killing Drury in a few months when Vesey or Goodrow are playing in the top 6-9? The Rangers absolutely have a need on the right side and if Patrick Kane is coming for 800K plus bonuses, I'd sign up for that in a heartbeat. Going into the season with a complete roster would be nice for once, wouldn't you agree? I know you hate paying rental prices, this is how you avoid that.
What the hell is a 5 on 5 net front guy?
could Zac Jones be a “sweetener” in a Goodrow trade hypothetically?
It's not gonna be a younger player on the PP instead of Kane. It'll be Trocheck instead of Kane and right now, it should be.Is Kane playing on the first unit PP again? That opportunity should go to someone else. The Rangers are playing the first 3 months of the regular season without Kane and here comes Kane who replaces a younger player on the PP.
I would like to see Lafreniere play on the right side. Kreider is not a 3rd line player.
Kane is not eligible for bonuses.
A lineup of all finesse players doesn't work.
The Rangers can't have another season of 9 top 6 forwards.
WAY too much. He’s one of our top few prospects. You dont trade him for a small cap dump.could Zac Jones be a “sweetener” in a Goodrow trade hypothetically?
Probably the Rangers if any way possible lol. His wife really liked NY. Happy wife happy life.Don't know what Tarasenko is looking for. Literally nobody has the space to offer his demands outside of scorched earth teams.
The shit is starting to hit the fan on the league's unsustainable financial model.
NOSign this kid
NO NO NO NOTo be completely honest, I'd attach our 2024 2nd rounder to Goodrow if it meant we can bring back Tarasenko on a 1-2 year deal at 3-4m.
Otherwise, you'll be trading that 2nd in February anyway for a rental.
We should not be adding to move Good; his value will go up w/the next fall injury.WAY too much. He’s one of our top few prospects. You dont trade him for a small cap dump.
Get rid of Robertson if anyone is going.
We did that with VeseyWe saw Goligoski do this with Minnesota where he signed a 1 year deal for way less money and then half way through the year he signed an extension for a bit more once Minnesota opened up some space. It was a handshake agreement between the player and team. It's risky for the player obviously in case an injury occurs.
Is Kane playing on the first unit PP again? That opportunity should go to someone else. The Rangers are playing the first 3 months of the regular season without Kane and here comes Kane who replaces a younger player on the PP.
I would like to see Lafreniere play on the right side. Kreider is not a 3rd line player.
Kane is not eligible for bonuses.
A lineup of all finesse players doesn't work.
The Rangers can't have another season of 9 top 6 forwards.
About 30% of Wheeler's points schmoints are goals and about 60% of Kreider's points schmoints are goals so I guess being a designated 5 on 5 net front guy gives you the freedom to apply your individual talents to the role. Cised.Wheeler, Kreider, Laf...
I agree, we shouldnt be adding anything truthfully, ESPECIALLY one of our better prospects like Jones.NO
Zadina should ONLY have been acquired as a cap dump if we were sending Trouba retained to DET this yr for Zadina's 1.8 + Gettinger 775 or whatev k coming back. Instant 3.0-3.5 cap returned, structural cap reform, and we see about Z w/Chytil IF we get too much to turn down for LaF
otherwise NO
NO NO NO NO
stop wasting assets
damnit to hell
no
no effin win now rentals which actually = lost, squandered assets
We should not be adding to move Good; his value will go up w/the next fall injury.
BUT total disagree on the bold
Jones does not sniff Robertson or Scanlin
stop overrating ZJ
You have to qualify What playing well is. He was struggling getting out of his own zone and managing breakouts over on that side and that's what virtually everybody identified would be the issue for any of those three to switch sides because none of them are particularly strong on that side of the ice. In reality this roster is designed with so many interchangeable parts without set roles. I mean virtually everybody got rotated between all the various top 9 spots so it just becomes tiresome for me to hear that this guy struggled because of whatever line he was or wasn't on. I'm just done with the excuses after 3 years. He's got to do it at this pointPanarin and Kreider belong ahead of him but that’s where moving him to RW came into play.. He was playing well with Trocheck and Panarin there and then GG removed him from it. They didn’t have anyone who should be over him (on RW) at that time and no Goodrow/Vesey weren’t it
Sorry, my discussed for how this organization has handled the last 5 years without any actual direction is just being at my soul at this point. If things don't pan out with some stability after this year I hope they absolutely just clean shop on everybody and bring in somebody new to actually only entire situation with a direction and a plan, but even saying that it doesn't matter because the only is always going to be the guy pulling strings around here. One stubbed toe on the coffee table away from a new directiveI hope that pays well. lol
That’s what i said though. It’s a 360 degree failure.
From every angle. We can’t just label one aspect