- Jul 16, 2005
- 14,857
- 13,012
I think most people define a rental as less than a season remaining on the contract.
My definition is an expensive acquisition that’s not a long term piece. Miller having one extra year matters not much.
I think most people define a rental as less than a season remaining on the contract.
I used to get 7 rentals for 7 days for only $7. Simpler times.I think most people define a rental as less than a season remaining on the contract.
I've been reading this board for 7 years, posting here for 6 & I can't recall one time Edge has predicted a trade correctly before it happened. Can you? Maybe I'm wrong & not recalling correctly & maybe he did before I showed up here, but he usually shares information after the fact, when nothing can be confirmed or denied. Please cite an example & I'll be the first to admit I'm wrong, but the fact that you continue to place all your eggs in that basket seems really odd to me. You're becoming Ed Jovonoski level of annoying with this.
I too, was alive during the days of the local video storeI used to get 7 rentals for 7 days for only $7. Simpler times.
Yes, along with a shady backroom blocked by a gross curtain and half burnt out neon sign above it indicating something beyond my 9 year old understandingI too, was alive during the days of the local video store
Phil would be more than welcome here, but I don't think Phil wants the bright lights on Broadway. The Hot Dogs might be to good to pass on thoughI'm not really a rental person, and I know not too many people would be on board, but if the deal is right, I'd take Kessel for two reasons. Like Goodrow, he's a got a few championships under his belt. The other thing is I'm afraid the pressure might be a bit too much for the younger guys, and I'd rather have him at right wing/top line come playoff time over Laf. This is if we couldn't get Smith from Vegas.
Phil would be more than welcome here, but I don't think Phil wants the bright lights on Broadway. The Hot Dogs might be to good to pass on though
While @Edge is more than capable enough of defending his own reputation, but if you go back to early 2021, he was warning the masses that Buchnevich return was going to be underwhelming to the majority of the fan base, but that it would be targeting a certain TYPE of player.
Considering most of these conversations are usuly very fluid until the trade papers are actually filed, I'd say that he nailed that trade.
For every transaction that actually happens, there are probably a dozen variations of that conversation and that same scenario probably takes place with a dozen other teams that bear no fruit.
Shit is bound to get leaked and while it may seem like BS to some, the logic that is added to the information provided by Edge is sound.
That can’t actually be your takeaway from that. You think Tarasenko isn’t going on strike if he was making AHL salary?Summed it up exactly. Thank you! Kravtsov wants to be treated like a player that has proven a lot more than he has.
He would take off and leave for sure. Do you not think it's reasonable for a player with 482 career points to act differently than a player with 4?That can’t actually be your takeaway from that. You think Tarasenko isn’t going on strike if he was making AHL salary?
Well, I can't say that I blame him, I do enjoy a good hot dog, but has Phil indicated that he's not a NYC type of person?Phil would be more than welcome here, but I don't think Phil wants the bright lights on Broadway. The Hot Dogs might be to good to pass on though
lol...yes, those were the 1980's!!Yes, along with a shady backroom blocked by a gross curtain and half burnt out neon sign above it indicating something beyond my 9 year old understanding
The question about extensions then becomes- if you are going to sign the player at the market clearing rate, why not just wait until guys come available in unrestricted free agency?
NYR isn't a team that has problems winning free agents for non financial reasons. This isn't Edmonton or Buffalo where you have to overpay for the location.
How do we know whether Malkin or Kane dreamed of finishing their careers in New York? We don't
I think it goes both ways. I think if Kravtsov was at the minimum getting NHL money he would have had a better attitude about it. It’s a big difference between NHL deal and AHL deal. Especially when he knows he can get paid in KHL. We all like to think money isn’t everything, but it absolutely matters.He would take off and leave for sure. Do you not think it's reasonable for a player with 482 career points to act differently than a player with 4?
Especially when the first time he “quit” on the team he was simply exercising a mutually agreed upon clause in his contract. I don’t think anyone on this forum would’ve done differently in his shoes.I think it goes both ways. I think if Kravtsov was at the minimum getting NHL money he would have had a better attitude about it. It’s a big difference between NHL deal and AHL deal. Especially when he knows he can get paid in KHL. We all like to think money isn’t everything, but it absolutely matters.
Yes he said the Buch deal would be underwhelming, but there's a poster that has latched on to two specific deals that Edge mentioned that seem suspect at best, bullshit at worst. And I don't think Edge is bullshitting, but I think his source was given bad info or simply had it wrong when no legitimate sources anywhere else has even hinted those deals were even discussed. I'd also question how much access he still has when the front office was basically turned over with a new staff.
However, my response was less about Edge & more about not blindly following an anonymous poster on a hockey forum to the point where you can't have a productive conversation. I appreciate the insight that Edge shares with his posts & I wasn't questioning his integrity. I just don't think the info he receives is gospel nor should it be parroted over & over when the outcome will never change.
What makes it seem suspect? Drury and the org clearly had a goal of adding grit and truculence this offseason, taking a lesser "value" package on the Buch trade would fit right in with that. And the fact that other sources didn't have it doesn't mean a ton to me...first of all we know the NYR front office has been running a tight ship. Second of all, guys like Larry and Carp/Staple who depend on access for clicks might hesitate to drop such a bombshell that might make the new GM look back weeks into his tenure when they were still building relationships.
They once again dropped the podcast immediately after my walk to work.Friedman & Marek touched on NYR today.
Friedman again says NYR are looking to do something big. They are again revisiting teams on VK.
"Jim Dolan made a change last year because he lost patience. They are good this year. They have a goalie covering up a lot of their mistakes, but Drury knows the owner is impatient. They are looking at things."
Friedman & Marek touched on NYR today.
Friedman again says NYR are looking to do something big. They are again revisiting teams on VK.
"Jim Dolan made a change last year because he lost patience. They are good this year. They have a goalie covering up a lot of their mistakes, but Drury knows the owner is impatient. They are looking at things."
I was speaking to the comment that we needed a better 2C. If you don’t think we need that my response was moot. I DO think we should upgrade (even if we keep Strome and move him to wing), but I don’t think he’s awful at C like some.
My bottom line is that I don’t think we should be spending big on short term solutions. At 2C nor any other position. Just my take.
Start going to work later. No one likes a "go geter"They once again dropped the podcast immediately after my walk to work.