RangersFan1994
Registered User
- Aug 20, 2019
- 19,175
- 15,824
Listen, some of us are still pissed they passed on Bossy for Duguay and DeBlois. It will be a long time.I imagine we’ll still be talking about Buch in 2034. It’s only like 12 years away.
Hell, 12 years ago we had guys like Redden, Avery and the ever promising Enver Lisin. Guys we still talk about.
Listen, some of us are still pissed they passed on Bossy for Duguay and DeBlois. It will be a long time.
A long time.
His friends call him "Jonny 'Simplex' B"The gift that keeps giving
Would Vilardi for Kravtsov straight up interest either party? Or is Vilardi now seen as a winger?
A fair question to ask would be "If we switch Chytil and Strome, would Strome still produce?".Chytil can't even produce on the 3rd line. Why are we promoting him?
Kreider beasting for Colorado would really drive me to eat my heart out. Yuck.And then Buch probably would not have been traded and everyone’s happy. Except Krieder is scoring all these goals in CO… and I’m sure there’s people who would ream management over it. Hahah. Sometimes it’s just about making the least terrible choice.
Oh. Can we please not send this thread down the COVID opinion toilet again? Hahaha.
I think that they don’t have to necessarily keep Strome but the situation has to be handled sensitively. Not terribly concerned, just saying.I mean that’s his best friend on the team off ice too. Again not saying it’s right or wrong but they need to evaluate if they want Strome or the mystery box.
Why have the last 11 days felt like 2 months?
Pleading for someone to post up an early GDT
Robertson over Schneider on the taxi squad.... interesting
A fair question to ask would be "If we switch Chytil and Strome, would Strome still produce?".
Strome has produced in the past without Panarin.
Chytil shows skill, but that’s about it. It’s frustrating to see him make plays but not finish. At some point you have to start cashing in.
A fair question to ask would be "If we switch Chytil and Strome, would Strome still produce?".
good chance Chytil gets traded unless they decide to give him 1 more year to breakout
he’s still young but I never understood why he didn’t start in the AHL. I think Barron will he better for it
The problem is that everyone here overrated him, people ignored the fact that he lacks vision and hands for creativity, he has speed and height, a decent shot but he doesnt use the players around him near enough and has zero interest in slowing things down to create something. Having said all that, that just described a nice 3rd line guy, and thats ok
Robertson and Jones likely be included in a trade and Schneider for sure won't be . This is in part a preview of sorts for them . That's how I see it . But...nobody really knows .I wouldn’t mind seeing Robertson-Lundkvist for a game or 2
Listen, some of us are still pissed they passed on Bossy for Duguay and DeBlois. It will be a long time.
A long time.
Krieder was making impacts the first full year he was here. He had more goals in his first 2 full seasons that Chytil has had in his entire career. What does Chytil bring in terms of skill? He lacks vision and scoring touch. he is also a minus 27 for his career while a guy like Kreider has always been a plus player. Chytil has no tools and no toolbox. These comparisons are way off.Remember when Kreider was all tools no toolbox? Well, this actually fits Chytil to a T. He has size, speed and skill. At this point it’s painful to see his lack of production.