Speculation: Roster Building Thread : Part XVI (Playoffs or Retool?)

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Van likely wants no conditions and Rangers want lottery protection. Trade Kreider, get a first, give it to Van. Bing, bang, boom.

Edit: Also, if lindgren is involved, I bet Soucy is coming back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: B17 Apricots
Van likely wants no conditions and Rangers want lottery protection. Trade Kreider, get a first, give it to Van. Bing, bang, boom.
We all know this season is ending with a mid first rounder, but I do think some protection is necessary. At least top 3 protection. That said, the other assets in this deal are pretty easy to live with losing and you have to give to get.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrAlmost
Van likely wants no conditions and Rangers want lottery protection. Trade Kreider, get a first, give it to Van. Bing, bang, boom.

Edit: Also, if lindgren is involved, I bet Soucy is coming back.

If he isn’t the rangers would actually be sending out more salary than they’re taking back.

I’d rather not take back a D that Vancouver would be willing to move in any deal. The guys they don’t want suck.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrAlmost
If he isn’t the rangers would actually be sending out more salary than they’re taking back.

I’d rather not take back a D that Vancouver would be willing to move in any deal. The guys they don’t want suck.

I wouldn't hate Soucy as a depth LD for this year and next. Yes, he has his shortcomings but in Seattle he was a decent bottom-pairing physical d-man with size. One year left on his deal
 
I'm curious why you think they would move Soucy? I really like him
I like him, but to be honest that was from years ago. He isn't doing too well in Van and salary considerations may be a part of it for not just this year, but next. Especially for the rangers. Also, Lindgren is younger than Soucy so maybe Van likes that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NYR Viper
I'm curious why you think they would move Soucy? I really like him
There’s been zero rumours around Soucy so that makes zero sense.

The part players there have been rumours around are Heinen, Hoglander, and Desharnais.

Some interesting *stuff* on Boeser, Demko.

One would assume Suter is also an interesting case because he’s expiring.

But zero on Soucy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NYR Viper
This team has 2014-15 Penguins written all over it. Limp into the playoffs on the last day and get obliterated by the top team in the East.

This team is going to squeak in on the last day of the season and get destroyed by Florida or Washington in the 1st round. At least it won't be Jersey again.

I know it’s customary to be all
Doom and gloom here and concoct the worst possible scenario but I don’t think people are being realistic with how stacked the deck is against this team to actually get in.

If they decide to hang onto Lindgren for the next month and a half, they will comfortably be out of it by deadline day.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I Eat Crow
There’s been zero rumours around Soucy so that makes zero sense.

The part players there have been rumours around are Heinen, Hoglander, and Desharnais.

Some interesting *stuff* on Boeser, Demko.

One would assume Suter is also an interesting case because he’s expiring.

But zero on Soucy.

Desharnais would make some sense as a bottom-pairing guy. Move Schneider up and play Desharnais with Vaak

I like him, but to be honest that was from years ago. He isn't doing too well in Van and salary considerations may be a part of it for not just this year, but next. Especially for the rangers. Also, Lindgren is younger than Soucy so maybe Van likes that.

Did I read somewhere that Quinn Hughes lauded Ryan Lindgren's leadership qualities while at USNDT? Or am I mis-remembering?
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrAlmost
Desharnais would make some sense as a bottom-pairing guy. Move Schneider up and play Desharnais with Vaak



Did I read somewhere that Quinn Hughes lauded Ryan Lindgren's leadership qualities while at USNDT? Or am I mis-remembering?

It was Clayton Keller who did it recently.

Lindgren and Hughes never crossed over there but they did play together at the WJC one year.
 
Reminds me of the Nash trade. Eventually deal ends up being “fair” but far less than the selling team could get if they had more leverage over partners and destination.
 
Who tweeted it?



Neither would I but I don’t think you can let him hold up a deal.

I’d much rather try to push Rempe on someone but I think most of the league knows how bad he is.
stop ...


Van likely wants no conditions and Rangers want lottery protection. Trade Kreider, get a first, give it to Van. Bing, bang, boom.

Edit: Also, if lindgren is involved, I bet Soucy is coming back.
... x2 ...


Desharnais would make some sense as a bottom-pairing guy. Move Schneider up and play Desharnais with Vaak



Did I read somewhere that Quinn Hughes lauded Ryan Lindgren's leadership qualities while at USNDT? Or am I mis-remembering?
... x3
Desh is now a pylon w/next season term
if taking him is part of give to get concession fine, but otherwise no
 
I wouldn't hate Soucy as a depth LD for this year and next. Yes, he has his shortcomings but in Seattle he was a decent bottom-pairing physical d-man with size. One year left on his deal

If they needed that type of player on their D I'd be more open to it but they don't. Being allergic to D who can move the puck is not a winning formula and is probably the biggest reason why this team wasn't able to get over the hump last year.

Is he that much better than Vaak? Because Vaak is going to sign for for like half of what Soucy makes and is really good at being unspectacular.

If they're going to drop money on a D, it has to be on someone who is actually worth it or is a slam dunk bargain sign (see: Gustafsson, who half of this board hated bc he isn't 6'3" 220 but was a good player here.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: mandiblesofdoom
I know it’s customary to be all
Doom and gloom here and concoct the worst possible scenario but I don’t think people are being realistic with how stacked the deck is against this team to actually get in.

If they decide to hang onto Lindgren for the next month and a half, they will comfortably be out of it by deadline day.
Fingers crossed. I have no illusions about this team. They're not doing anything this year.

I'm not advocating to clear the decks, but this year and next should be about a significant retool and moving away from this core of players. Lindgren, Kreider, Zibanejad should all go. Since Panarin's contract is up next summer, the pragmatic thing to do is to trade him also.
 
getting rid of Lindgren would be great but i'm still out on that deal unless the condition for the 1st is "win Stanley Cup".
 
  • Like
Reactions: tiggles
I know it’s customary to be all
Doom and gloom here and concoct the worst possible scenario but I don’t think people are being realistic with how stacked the deck is against this team to actually get in.

If they decide to hang onto Lindgren for the next month and a half, they will comfortably be out of it by deadline day.

Actually, it is otherwise. People are overly pessimistic about their chances to get in. For example, moneypuck has them at 51% to make the playoffs and The Athletic at 38% yet according to this site people act like it's 5.1%.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad