effen
Registered User
- Jun 27, 2003
- 12,757
- 10,975
And... I see the ridiculous overvaluing of picks continues...
Wat
Why on earth would Carolina do it for anything less. lol. I don't care what evens out the slider "fairness" wise.
And... I see the ridiculous overvaluing of picks continues...
Ahhh, I feel better now. I still don't move Lindgren or Rykov, they wont all pan out, and I would keep both to let them compete and let the chips fall where they may. And hey, if they do both work out, what does an NHL ready LHD get you when you are ready to really compete again? It's not a bad chip to hold.
As for the rest. I would love to see if something like Spooner to a team like the Canes, who think they need more players who can play right now would net us someone like Zykov, a younger (22 yo) right shooting winger. Maybe or maybe not, but I see that as way more possible then Spooner getting us a pick in the first round of this draft.
As for Names, I would sign him on a 2 year deal. I think he played below what he could for us, selling him now would be bad asset management. And Zucc, I really think he needs to be dealt, before he gets older and more tired of losing, but not sure what we can get.
Thanks for clearing up what you were saying, I thought you were doing a hail mary through it all in one bag and hope for a high pick type of proposal. LOL
Regarding Zucc
I doubt they take a lousy deal just to trade him at the draft. Then I think the TDL becomes more enticing. I personally think he is dealt. Possibly resigned thereafter. For all purposes the guy is a huge fan favorite bleeding Broadway Blue, plays mostly decent 2 way hockey and was in fact the NYR leading scorer 4 of the past 5 seasons (not including MSL in 2013+2014 as he scored mostly in Tampa) -
We need to find a sucker GM and get a good return for such a player that lead our scoring 4 outta 5 years when we were not that bad yet definitely scoring by committee[TBODY] [/TBODY]
2013-2014 - Most points 2015-2016 - Most points 2016-2017 - Most points 2017-2018 - Most points
I wouldn't do that.Zibenajad, Skjei, and #9. Probably.
2004We shouldn’t trade up. Just take our 5 top 50 picks and go with it. I can’t remember the last time we’ve had this many picks.
2004
2004 and it didn't end well.We shouldn’t trade up. Just take our 5 top 50 picks and go with it. I can’t remember the last time we’ve had this many picks.
And it was just a terrible draft to have all those picks in.Urgh. 8 picks in the first 90 and we only come out with Dubi, Korpi and a backup goalie. Callahan in the 4th 'saves' the draft somewhat, but hopefully our drafting at the pointy end has improved a lot for 2018!
So I read earlier in this thread (I think?) that Detroit would be willing to trade down.
Does the 6th overall and the 30th (or 31st) overall for 9th overall and 26th overall get it done?
9OA plus one of the late 1sts or our own 2nd will get it done. Historically, that's what the value has been.So I read earlier in this thread (I think?) that Detroit would be willing to trade down.
Does the 6th overall and the 30th (or 31st) overall for 9th overall and 26th overall get it done?
Hate to be a buzzkill, but this bit only worked in that movie because he had the 1st overall pick.
We can't say anyone no matter what because 8 teams pick ahead of us. There's a lot of "what" that can happen that is out of our control.
No. I think it's pretty likely that the guy you want at 26 will still be there at 30. Much less likely for 6 to 9.So I read earlier in this thread (I think?) that Detroit would be willing to trade down.
Does the 6th overall and the 30th (or 31st) overall for 9th overall and 26th overall get it done?
Zucc did say that he most likely stays, after a meeting with Gorton. But if he doesn't live up to his standards next season...by all means, trade him at the TDL.
There are also a couple of other scenarios:
- He doesn't want to stay here because he thinks the Rangers will not be a cup contender for the next 2-3 years. Then he could be traded at the draft to a place he wants to go, I'm pretty sure Pittsburgh is one of them.
-The Rangers offer him a contract extension, and he accepts. This can be done in a month already.
I don't think so. I think you would need to give the 30th and the 9th for the 6th.So I read earlier in this thread (I think?) that Detroit would be willing to trade down.
Does the 6th overall and the 30th (or 31st) overall for 9th overall and 26th overall get it done?
Zucc did say that he most likely stays, after a meeting with Gorton. But if he doesn't live up to his standards next season...by all means, trade him at the TDL.
There are also a couple of other scenarios:
- He doesn't want to stay here because he thinks the Rangers will not be a cup contender for the next 2-3 years. Then he could be traded at the draft to a place he wants to go, I'm pretty sure Pittsburgh is one of them.
-The Rangers offer him a contract extension, and he accepts. This can be done in a month already.
If I can get Wahlstrom at 6 I DO IT!I'd really hate moving up only three spots but if Wahlstrom is still there at 6 and there's a deal to be made...
If I can get Wahlstrom at 6 I DO IT!
9OA plus one of the late 1sts or our own 2nd will get it done. Historically, that's what the value has been.
But, as with all drafts, it will usually come down to A) what Detroit's draft board looks like and B) how picks 1 to 5 actually pan out. That will determine how willing they will be to move the pick and, in turn, how much it will take to make that trade.
I'm going to disagree on Kotkaniemi over him but that's fair other than that.The players I would pick over Wahlstrom:
Dahlin
Svechnikov
Zadina
Boqvist
Hughes
Kotkaniemi
At least one of those will be available at 6