Mac n Gs
Drury plz
- Jan 17, 2014
- 22,836
- 13,560
Don’t worry, I picked that up. I’m not that much of a young’n that I don’t know who Keith Tkachuk isI mention Tkachuk because of his father's connection to the franchise.

Don’t worry, I picked that up. I’m not that much of a young’n that I don’t know who Keith Tkachuk isI mention Tkachuk because of his father's connection to the franchise.
Probably. 8 F + 4 D + 1 G and they have $17M in cap space right now, that's not assuming any cap space Spezza would net them another $7.5M... They could make a HUGE free agency splash with that kind of money. THey have this coming season left with Seguin on a $5.625M contract. After that he needs a raise, probably something to get him up to near what Benn makes--$9-10MIs Dallas still lookin to possibly move Spezza?
Lol they’d have to find a fan base 1stI'd love to see how the Yotes sell a move like that to their fan base.
I'm assuming as much. I just think the Yotes would be hard-pressed to pass on the next Tkachuk.
I don’t think they give a single **** about that.
You may think they don't care about that. But ownership might. The franchise has a dubious future in AZ. They're looking for a new building. This is the kind of PR move that they could feel would help energize the fanbase.
You can't ship Staal for more assets but you can ship Staal and lose other assets.So Marc Staal's contract becomes a modified no trade clause starting next season. I can see us starting the year with Zucc and him, if we suck hard, we'll ship those guys for more assets.
Definitely what Nash was when that contract was signed, right on
I think he'll still fetch us something, specially if we retain some money. His contract is the only reason he looks like a total trainwreck.
No one is taking Staal's contract straight up.
The secret is out, the league knows he stinks, can't skate etc
You're either attaching an asset to him to get rid of him, or taking back an equally awful contract
We had the same conversations about Girardi. Everyone thought he could be traded to a team looking for 'veteran leadership'.I think he'll still fetch us something, specially if we retain some money. His contract is the only reason he looks like a total trainwreck.
3rd pairing pleaseTraining camp and the 1st month of the season will be interesting to see what Quinn does with Staal.
14. Vladislav Namestnikov, New York Rangers
This is more of a placeholder for any number of Rangers than it is an indication that Namestnikov gets moved, but the Rangers are certainly listening. They have four forwards who are arbitration eligible — Namestnikov, Kevin Hayes, Jimmy Vesey and Ryan Spooner. One source said he thought it was unlikely the Rangers started next season with all four of those players on their roster.
Another called the Rangers open for business.
“They are open to anything,” said the executive. “I don’t think they’re set on moving one particular guy.”
Namestnikov had just four points in 19 games after being traded to the Rangers. But with back-to-back 20-goal seasons with the Lightning, he’s going to get a big raise this summer.
NHL Trade Big Board: 20 players who could be on the move...
I have little faith in Chiarelli, but this might be stretching my lack of confidence in him.Go get me the 10th overall from Edmonton for Namestnikov
After they moved heaven and earth to keep him from Vegas last June.Panthers' D Alex Petrovic is on the trading block
Wonder what the cost would be? He hasn't put it all together but he does have the size we lack on the right sidePanthers' D Alex Petrovic is on the trading block
Smith and MarchessaultWonder what the cost would be?