NoQuitInNewMexico
it's okay cause it's all just the way it should be
DeAngelo says the thing about Vesey requesting a trade is BS
It's 1.25% total. The players have the option to use whatever number they want as the escalator up to 5%.
It too just looked that up
Here is the pertaining part
31 Thoughts: Sharks still have shot at keeping Erik Karlsson - Sportsnet.ca
I thought they used a much higher percentage of the escalator. Although lifted it I'm not sure if means they only used 1.25%,, of it they used 1.25% more than whatever they used last time around.
Goodbye Jim, have fun being mediocre elsewhere.Lot of Vesey stuff today in the twitter verse including him requesting a trade and it not being the first time.
Not cut out for NYC I guess
DeAngelo says the thing about Vesey requesting a trade is BS
DeAngelo says the thing about Vesey requesting a trade is BS
Not in the last couple of years. The PA has a concern about the "growth rate" of the HRR isn't what it should be and are hedging by downcasting their escrow. Escrow is a tool for owners to maintain that 50-50 split with the NHLPA.
The PA doesn't trust the owners on two fronts, reporting, and the projections. The Owners don't want to lose an inch of the 50-50.
Thus it's manifested itself through escalator negotiations. During the next "lockout" escrow is going to be the number 1 issue from the NHLPA. Players have given back somewhere between 8-11% back to the owners.
DeAngelo says the thing about Vesey requesting a trade is BS
I think the rumors goofballs picked it up off one of the Barstool guys, and they at least have connections, especially to "Boston clique" playersIf whoever posted that here knew NHL Rumors was the sauce, then GTFO with that ****. They’re garbage and everyone knows it.
Well than, removing that would only be a partial solution.
If they move the midpoint, how does that effect what teams end up spending? Wouldn't most still spend above the mid point?
If whoever posted that here knew NHL Rumors was the sauce, then GTFO with that ****. They’re garbage and everyone knows it.
?To be fair i doubt ADA knows whats going on behind the scenes right now. And I doubt the Rangers have told Vesey whats going on either for him to be able to tell ADA
He's responding to the idea that Vesey asked for a trade, which I am sure he would know since he was just with him playing golf.To be fair i doubt ADA knows whats going on behind the scenes right now. And I doubt the Rangers have told Vesey whats going on either for him to be able to tell ADA
Vesey has been on Chicklets though...and with Kakko/Kratsov coming in, some forwards need to clear out.
No problem with Vesey going in a deal.
Yeah the chiclets guys are worth listening to on this one.
I don't think hes demanding anything, but I do think its pretty clear that he's on his way out.
Under the radar move but I’d be just fine moving a 3rd to get Ryan Reaves in NY.
Find other ways to replenish picks but he’s a guy who changes an entire dynamic of a team and someone who would be useful for the next 3-4 years on the 4th line.
Vegas needs cap space. The Rangers made a similar move for McQuaid. Reaves makes more sense as he’s a forward.
Ok this is a bit more legitimate. Thought the rumors were in regards to NHLrumorsdaily or what ever that account is called.
PZ out Jimmy, SONK!.
Whoops I missed that. Thought it was the trade in generalHe's responding to the idea that Vesey asked for a trade, which I am sure he would know since he was just with him playing golf.
I would not trust their projections, I mean the cap always seems to come in under what they project around December.
Yet their reporting I assume is audited?
Maybe more things count against the players share than the PA anticipated?
The tweet from the RearAdmiral guy (whoever that is, I don't follow him) doesn't mention anything about "demanding" a trade.
Could be that they already have several offers on the table, awaiting to see how draft weekend plays out, and they've already informed him he'll be moving one way or another.![]()
I'm not talking about moving the midpoint. The midpoint stays the same. The goal is to try to force teams to spend closer to the midpoint.
The idea I'm talking about would mean setting up a system where the cap is, say, 10% above the midpoint while the floor is 15% below it. So on a $70m per team mid-point (just for easy numbers), the current cap would be $80.5m (15% over) and the floor would be $59.5 (15% under). Under this idea, the cap would be $77m (10% over) and the floor would still be the same. The amount the players get is still the same, but since teams aren't spending as much over the midpoint, the amount of escrow being required to be set aside each quarter is smaller.