Speculation: Roster Building Thread: Part XIV (To trade or not to trade is the question)

GoAwayPanarin

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 27, 2008
44,462
57,942
In High Altitoad
Are there any realistic ways to fix the defense in season? Id like to see Vaakanainen healthy but like, we can't be expecting much. Even if Lindgren gets benched, we have no one else. Connor Mackey? Love his heart but cmon. Usually I have guys in mind but I am really at a loss.

If everyone is healthy?

Yes Vaak.

We have the player, we should try to figure out what he can and can’t do here.

We know what Lindgren is and if we have a better (and cheaper) alternative then that’s an easy solution.
 

bobbop

Henrik & Pop
Sponsor
May 27, 2004
14,600
21,396
Now, Suburban Phoenix. Then, Long Island
Tan Kuzmetsov/

Unfortunately Dallas has one of the smartest GMs around. Dallas is also close to a SC champion. Who is going to play RD for them. That’s why I believe if we are going to make a big trade with the stars, senators, etc., Schneider will need to be added to the equation. Kreider is too old and gimpy to demand the type of young talent we covet.
Mr. Smarty Pants traded a first for Nils Lindqvist. He doesn’t get them all right.
 

McRanger92

Registered User
Jun 7, 2017
12,349
23,183
If everyone is healthy?

Yes Vaak.

We have the player, we should try to figure out what he can and can’t do here.

We know what Lindgren is and if we have a better (and cheaper) alternative then that’s an easy solution.

Do we even know what his injury is? Or the timeline?
 

bobbop

Henrik & Pop
Sponsor
May 27, 2004
14,600
21,396
Now, Suburban Phoenix. Then, Long Island
listening to Coach John Goyans break down the Rangers defensive woes going all the way back to the St. Louis game.
He called the team defensive strategy “Hoping and a Poking”.
Talked about the team having no sense of what to do when the puck is in their defensive trapezoid.
Looked up and found that Phil Housley retired in 2002/03 and the NHL Trapezoid Rule didn’t take effect until 2005/06.
This could be the problem.
Starts at the 18:00 mark:

Remembering back to when Housely was hired, I made a point of noting he wasn’t well regarded as a position coach in Arizona. Ultimately he was forced out. Seems like nothing has changed.
 

JimmyG89

Registered User
May 1, 2010
9,980
8,749


I'd put a claim in for Dermott. His numbers are a little misleading. He was paired with Darnell Nurse for the majority of his time on ice. Anything away from him and he has been okay.

Worst case is he is a cheap depth LHD. With Miller getting hurt and no knowing the severity, you're down to Lindgren/Jones/Vaak. Might even help facilitate a move with Lindgren so you don't have to worry about having enough bodies on the backend.
 

GAGLine

Registered User
Sep 17, 2007
24,511
21,714
I dont think Nill is all that different a GM than Drury. Some Ws, some Ls. Ultimately hasnt gotten over the hump.
Nill had to deal with both Benn and Seguin on high priced, long-term contracts while neither was playing well. Despite that, they have remained competitive.

He and the coaches were willing to let the young guys run with it, and relegated Benn and Seguin to lesser roles. Thus far, Drury and Lavi haven't been willing to do that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CLW

McRanger92

Registered User
Jun 7, 2017
12,349
23,183
Nill had to deal with both Benn and Seguin on high priced, long-term contracts while neither was playing well. Despite that, they have remained competitive.

He and the coaches were willing to let the young guys run with it, and relegated Benn and Seguin to lesser roles. Thus far, Drury and Lavi haven't been willing to do that.

There's still time for Drury to mandate that adjustment, but it would involve him firing Laviolette in all likelihood.
 

TGWL

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 28, 2011
16,551
11,309
Are there any realistic ways to fix the defense in season? Id like to see Vaakanainen healthy but like, we can't be expecting much. Even if Lindgren gets benched, we have no one else. Connor Mackey? Love his heart but cmon. Usually I have guys in mind but I am really at a loss.
Yeah, have the entire team play with some legs and a structure that works. It's not all on the actual defensemen. They won't be top in the league with the players they have on the back-end but it won't look like this. Instead, we'll probably make a trade, throw some assets at another soon to be whipping boy, while playing the same way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McRanger92

GoAwayPanarin

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 27, 2008
44,462
57,942
In High Altitoad
I'm not convinced Adam Fox gets them to trade Rossi.

He would. But that’s the level of player we’re talking about here.

If any top player becomes available, no team is better positioned to land said player than Minnesota. That system is pretty stacked and they’ve done it with out living at the bottom. Pretty impressive stuff minus Stramel over Perreault but no one is perfect.
 

bernmeister

Registered User
Jun 11, 2010
29,002
4,383
Da Big Apple
Guentzel would have been the right move last season. We would have been MUCH
better off if we paid more for Guentzel than the half measure thing we did with Roslovic and Wennberg.

That been said, I am certainly out on rentals now. Doesn’t make sense now. I’d take an expiring contract to dump bad contracts, but it would be ludicrous to pay assets for a playoff run at this point. But we know what is going to happen here
can't award a like b'c the first sentence.
but that said, wholeheartedly agree w/second sentence, full ass measure >>> half ass measure.

Howev, in order to be up to acceptable bern snuff, we need to at worst balance vets for better vets, and even then there is a pref to invest in quality youth over vets in the first place
 

Mac n Gs

Drury plz
Jan 17, 2014
22,777
13,386
I said it then, but the time to get Rossi was either last year or in the offseason when Guerin was shopping him for whatever reason. The underlying numbers were all obvious, the skill was there, the positional fit was there, and all he needed was the opportunity. There's no chance they're moving him now when he's fit like a glove between Kaprizov and Boldy
 

B17 Apricots

Registered User
May 18, 2016
2,082
2,418
I'm not convinced Adam Fox gets them to trade Rossi.
I think that's really unlikely.


This was an interesting article. It's been reported many times now for multiple seasons that Rossi has been on the block from Guerin. Idiotic to me, we can speculate why they may not trust him long term. Simply size? Or maybe the reports all this time is pure smoke and mirrors and they really love the guy. And like the article mentions, maybe he'll just be one of those guys where the trade rumors just consistently permeate but he never actually goes anywhere. I don't know, I'd take a gamble that there's gotta be some smoke there. They were likely floating his name around.

A couple seasons ago when they called him up to play on the 4th line, they certainly didn't prioritize him by any means. And up until Joel Eriksson Ek got hurt not too long ago Joel was the 1C there. He was getting the heavy usage, for better or worse. Rossi is just now filling that role. Ryan Hartman is back at center in Eriksson Ek's absence. He has some history with Kaprizov. They have some real solid center prospects in the pipeline.

So based off all these reports it's possible that Guerin & Co don't particularly value him the way others may.
 

eco's bones

Registered User
Jul 21, 2005
26,922
13,987
Elmira NY
I hope that Vaakanainen turns out to be a pleasant surprise but I don't have a lot of hope. This year is his 7th knocking around the NHL with almost as many games in the AHL. He made it with Anaheim for an entire year last year. It's not a fantastic team there and judging by his offensive production he doesn't have much of a two way game. He's an RFA for 25/26 and a UFA afterwards. It may be that he's better than Mackey and it may be that he's not.
 

Machinehead

HFNYR MVP
Jan 21, 2011
149,082
129,725
NYC
I think that's really unlikely.


This was an interesting article. It's been reported many times now for multiple seasons that Rossi has been on the block from Guerin. Idiotic to me, we can speculate why they may not trust him long term. Simply size? Or maybe the reports all this time is pure smoke and mirrors and they really love the guy. And like the article mentions, maybe he'll just be one of those guys where the trade rumors just consistently permeate but he never actually goes anywhere. I don't know, I'd take a gamble that there's gotta be some smoke there. They were likely floating his name around.

A couple seasons ago when they called him up to play on the 4th line, they certainly didn't prioritize him by any means. And up until Joel Eriksson Ek got hurt not too long ago Joel was the 1C there. He was getting the heavy usage, for better or worse. Rossi is just now filling that role. Ryan Hartman is back at center in Eriksson Ek's absence. He has some history with Kaprizov. They have some real solid center prospects in the pipeline.

So based off all these reports it's possible that Guerin & Co don't particularly value him the way others may.
If this is true, then they're dumber than I imagined any front office could be.

Still don't think they deal him for anything short of an elite player.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SnowblindNYR

bernmeister

Registered User
Jun 11, 2010
29,002
4,383
Da Big Apple
Guentzel would have basically ensured back to back sweeps to start the playoffs.

He wouldn’t have helped against Florida. Our problems in that series were Trouba and Lindgren shaped.
And ergo, since he would not have made a dif, the smart move was NOT to splurge assets for him.

Trading a 1st+ to watch Guentzel get smothered by Barkov then walk in free agency would’ve been hella fun at least?
Fun possibly but not good biz sense, we dodged a bullet there.

I don't see the need to trade Kreider for pieces that the team needs now at all. It's not a lack of depth that is a concern for the Rangers, it's a lack of high end, inexpensive pieces and defensive depth.

But why not just sign Frederic when he hits UFA and get something else for Kreider?
Frederick as ufa = $ only is a discussion then, not for assets now, setting aside ? of what those assets should be

Miller, Lindgren, Rempe for Weegar, Kuznetsov, Lomberg.
NO

I'm sure I'm way off base here but Buffalo & NYR seem like pretty good trade partners in need of a shake up. Maybe a deal centered around RFAs of Miller & KK for Byram & Peteka? NYR prob needs to add or maybe a lesser player than Peterka? But I'd like him for NYR as he can play both C & W.
no
KK + Miller worth more
and
Byram injury history [concussions] is to be avoided unless super cheap

I could see:

Kreider for Bischel + 1st

Miller for McTavish

Hell, if Anaheim were REALLY interested in trading Fowler I'd take him as part of the deal @ $4m per season to use as a bridge to the next crop of d-men
1. No on Kreider unless maybe it is him + for McAvoy dep on the +
2. ANA wants way more for McT
I like KAM but I don't get these KAM for Byfield, KAM for McT overtures
3. No on Fowler, huge no

Bern....we're in the win now mode, this franchise isn't gonna go backwards, people thinking we'll rebuild again are sorely mistaken. Dolan wants a cup and he's not waiting and hoping on another 5 year rebuild.
....
I realize this language can be off-putting but I'm sorry it needs to be said.

bern is entirely correct, the win now posture fails 99% of the time, it is based on desperation that cannibalizes assets and shortens our window.
That is a factually true statement.

Dolan and anybody else who thinks we can just throw one more log on the fire and everything will work out is sadly mistaken
There is a need to ADMIT bern IS RIGHT and the concept of 'win now' MUST and SHALL CONTINUE -- as track record demonstrates is the case -- to have to BEND, BUCKLE AND BREAK in capitulation to my approach, which is not 111% guaranteed (nothing is) and takes more time, but is reliable.

And that once again is BUILD with quality youth
start w/great drafting
Add good risk bets when opportunity presents

And for the love of all that is holy
STOP with crazy vet overreaches

I am sure there is exception to every rule, but that is the rule we will follow, eventually, or suffer the consequences of failure to do so


I read that Fox is being shopped and Montreal is definitely in on him!
OTT is the club who will pay more
good young D Kleven
Pinto, Grieg
and better picks
for
Fox
worse picks


Find a coach that wants to change the system before we start moving Fox etc.
That would normally make some degree of sense but not here. Why? b'c reason to consider moving Fox, besides overpay, is that he will never improve his skating/speed. NEVER
A system change to accommodate this cannot succeed

Even if it masks the issue temporarily, ultimately truth prevails
The flaws in Fox's game are real, and will only get worse
Sell high

If there is a better system based on the merits of that system, that is something else
but let's not kid ourselves b'c we like a guy

til tom peeps
 

MrAlmost

Beer league hero.
Jun 3, 2010
2,685
3,303
Seems Couzens is available. Rangers need to make that move. What would it take? Chytil and Kakko? Just Chytil? Just Kakko? Z waive? Either way I'd get him.
 

bernmeister

Registered User
Jun 11, 2010
29,002
4,383
Da Big Apple
Speaking of buy low opportunities, what do we think StL will want for Broberg?

He has the physical tools, is young, like Robertson was not brought along properly at first, but now has put it together
not superstardom level, but can be competent and productive solution
lefty who plays the right side

before we ask on the big board, what are Blues' needs and can we offer currency of prospect Fs we are happy with to effect that?

Seems Couzens is available. Rangers need to make that move. What would it take? Chytil and Kakko? Just Chytil? Just Kakko? Z waive? Either way I'd get him.
pls stop giving better pieces for lesser pieces.
 

MrAlmost

Beer league hero.
Jun 3, 2010
2,685
3,303
Speaking of buy low opportunities, what do we think StL will want for Broberg?

He has the physical tools, is young, like Robertson was not brought along properly at first, but now has put it together
not superstardom level, but can be competent and productive solution
lefty who plays the right side

before we ask on the big board, what are Blues' needs and can we offer currency of prospect Fs we are happy with to effect that?


pls stop giving better pieces for lesser pieces.
Sure sure sure. We should trade Igor and Fox for Juulsen and Raty though.

Cozens is good. Add Lindgren and get Samuelsson too. He is hurt a lot, but when he plays he seems capable.
 

UnSandvich

Registered User
Sep 7, 2017
5,635
8,391
If this is true, then they're dumber than I imagined any front office could be.

Still don't think they deal him for anything short of an elite player.

I follow the Wild as a second team, and honestly there's been signals that Guerin doesn't especially like the player for a while now. Idk why, small maybe.

As an aside, their beat guy on the Athletic (Russo) is up there with Aaron Portzline out of Columbus as one of the best reporters on the site.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Machinehead

bernmeister

Registered User
Jun 11, 2010
29,002
4,383
Da Big Apple
Sure sure sure. We should trade Igor and Fox for Juulsen and Raty though.

Cozens is good. Add Lindgren and get Samuelsson too. He is hurt a lot, but when he plays he seems capable.
woah, woah woah
Let's not misrepresent shit

Igor + for Byfield +

Fox for the package I said from Sens

Juulsen + Raty to get rid of and cap dump prob child Zib so we move on immediately

I don't mind objective criticism, but nothing out of context pls
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad