Savant
Registered User
- Oct 3, 2013
- 36,656
- 12,208
Lindgren is tanking them. You need to trade him just so he isn’t in the lineup anymore. Very obviously addition by subtraction there
Clear as day and I love the guyLindgren is tanking them. You need to trade him just so he isn’t in the lineup anymore. Very obviously addition by subtraction there
Yep, that's why Prov is probably not the best fit for us. Unless you are willing to commit to a 6 year $6M dealThey want a first round pick for him. Someone who might get traded for a first is not getting signed to low AAV/low term/no clauses a few months later
No it isn't. If they fire another coach it enables to players. This has become a battle between the players and the management. The management isnt giving the players another out by firing another coach. That ship sailed...Heard alot of talk about player movement from the beat writers.
Havent heard much of anything from the beat writers about potential coaching changes. Reaching that critical stage.
Putting berard on the 4th line is criminal if you want to reward hustle and effort. Just send him down the Hartford to score 30g instead of playing 7 mins a game here...Panarin-Trocheck-Laf
Kreider-Zibanejad-Smith
Cuylle-Chytil-Kakko
Edstrom-Carrick-Berard
Vaak-Fox
Mileer-Schneider
Jones-Mancini
No it isn't. If they fire another coach it enables to players. This has become a battle between the players and the management. The management isnt giving the players another out by firing another coach. That ship sailed...
Putting beard on the 4th line is criminal if you want to reward hustle and effort. Just send him down the Hartford to score 30g instead of playing 7 mins a game here...
Alrighty then. My bad.
The lesson is they need good snarl.I agree we need to move on from Lindgren but we need some snarl on the back end. This team currently has none
Walman makes the most sense.
He’s solid and a good AAV for next season too.
Maybe Lauzon for the 3rd pair with Mancini?
Walman Fox
KAM Schneider
Lauzon Mancini
Jones
Not sexy but better
No it isn't. If they fire another coach it enables to players. This has become a battle between the players and the management. The management isnt giving the players another out by firing another coach. That ship sailed...
Putting beard on the 4th line is criminal if you want to reward hustle and effort. Just send him down the Hartford to score 30g instead of playing 7 mins a game here...
Holy shit I said this in the PGTI miss the defense under Jacques Martin.
If Nashville wanted a mulligan on the Skjei contract, would we take him for free? Contract is pretty bad long term and might cause some issues after this year, but he would fit well on the top 2 pairs and really help the D this year. Could then trade Lindgren with retention for a draft pick.Rangers really screwed themselves when they didn’t make upgrades on defense in the off season. There was some quality defenseman available this off season and we decided to run it back with Lindgren and trouba
if by some miracle we can't expect that gets done in one fell swoop, fineI agree we need to move on from Lindgren but we need some snarl on the back end. This team currently has none
YesFox needs to go
1. Actually, then canThat ship sailed until they lose another game. Then another.
They can't move all these players out. Defensive coach needs to be held accountable as much as the players. So does Lavi. He's losing this group.
very outside chance Mika adds Nash, a music city, to his narrow set of possiblesIf Nashville wanted a mulligan on the Skjei contract, would we take him for free? Contract is pretty bad long term and might cause some issues after this year, but he would fit well on the top 2 pairs and really help the D this year. Could then trade Lindgren with retention for a draft pick.
Miller-Fox
Skjei-Schneider
Jones/Vaak-Mancini
lol are you actually trying to bring factual analysis into the discussion about k'andre miller? this board f***ing hates him lolbefore we continue to shit on Miller: he was on the ice tonight for 20 minutes 5v5 at an xGA of 0.76 and Quick gave up 3. he played a very good game, the goaltending didn't do him any favors (he also scored a goal and created another).
I'm doubtful they move Miller at all. I think they'll keep Schneider, Miller and Fox and work pieces around those three.As a CBJ fan, I think and hope not. But given that Waddell seemed hellbent on paying to acquire Trouba, I'm not ruling anything out.
Miller, on the other hand, would be great for Columbus, but I highly doubt you guys actually move him. Certainly not for Provorov.
Edstrom played 7:52 todayLavi plays that 4th line a lot. He seems to trust Edstrom, who is a demon on the forecheck and carrick (even if he’s prone to dumb penalties). I think Berard would add to their effectiveness. Another pest pressuring the defense.
At this point I think it's possible that drury will go down with the ship rather than give in to these players. I'm telling you, this has turned philosophically personal.That ship sailed until they lose another game. Then another.
They can't move all these players out. Defensive coach needs to be held accountable as much as the players. So does Lavi. He's losing this group.
Pretty much. I liked Trouba, too, especially given how weak our right side was at that time, but it's become pretty clear he's on the decline.Clear as day and I love the guy