I go back and forth.
I agree that Drury hasn't really shown anything. At the same time, Gorton's tenure was soul-crushing and I'm not sure if anybody could have made anything good out of it.
Gorton started a rebuild and then did a 180 a year in and tied up a bunch of money. He basically told his replacement "hey, you have to compete wth what's on the team, because I left you with a bunch of big stupid contracts and terrible draft picks."
Drury did extend Zibanejad, but as much as I think that's a bad idea, there's not a GM in the league that wasn't doing that in the same situation. He was the de facto 1C and the previous GM already decided the rebuild was over.
Gorton's track record with Montreal (still trading vets for picks, not wading too deep into FA) as well as the way his departure from NY went down (if you believe Larry quoted below) lead me to believe that the "acceleration of the rebuild" was heavily influenced if not demanded by Dolan.
This wasn’t as much about past performance as future intentions. This wasn’t at all about missing the playoffs this year but rather the possibility of missing them again next year and maybe the year after that while following a long and winding rebuild road.
Information is at a premium when it concerns the thought process of Garden and Rangers CEO Jim Dolan, who until this moment had resisted anything like this intervention on the hockey side of the business.
In that sense, this is shocking.
But sources indicate that Dolan’s vision of the future, and more specifically the immediate future, clashed with the blueprint embraced by now-former team president John Davidson and now-former general manager Jeff Gorton,
both dismissed Wednesday. Three years after The Letter and only two years after luring Davidson from Columbus to oversee the program, philosophies diverged.
But either way, I hear you that Drury was dealt many immovable objects.
That said, even acknowledging the hand he was dealt, Drury has done little to truly inspire confidence.
Here is his track record...feel free to add / correct if I am forgetting things
The bad:
1. 2021 Offseason - Goodrow, Nemeth, hiring Gallant, trading assets for Reaves, and of course the Buchnevich trade.
2. Kane fiasco - the cap accrual nonsense disruption to fit a big name PP specialist in is laughable in hindsight
3. Nemeth fiasco - deserves another mention...not only the signing but trading two 2nds to shed the deal ONE YEAR later
4. Mika contract - yes most NHL GMs would have signed it, but the signs were there. Mika's 5v5 metrics compared to other Cs were already slipping on a percentile ranking basis. More AAV for less trade protection likely smarter in hindsight.
5. Revolving RW trades - Dealing 1st/2nd (Tarasenko or Kane), 2nd, 4th for the "magic bullet" RW for 93-20 instead of realizing that the problem wasn't the RW...
6. Failure to remake the defense - Has been a glaring issue his entire tenure and there is little evidence Drury even sees it as an issue
7. Has a reputation for being "tight lipped" yet has had numerous public sideshows during his tenure...makes me wonder if he is as smart as he thinks he is
The good:
1. Trocheck and Fox contracts - additionally decision to pivot from Copp to Trocheck was great scouting and execution
2. Getting value for Lundkvist
3. Drafting generally looks good, though a bit too early to truly evaluate...if Othmann gives the franchise nothing, that hurts the track record
4. Identifying short term team needs - deadline trades and cheap vet signings generally good fits for short term needs
5. Being ruthless on Goodrow
I don't know how you can look at the two lists and conclude Drury deserves a shot to rebuild this team. The easiest "glass onion" explanation when you peel back the layers is that he is at best a replacement level GM, and possibly a terrible one. His contract work and scouting (professional and amateur) look ok. His short term planning looks ok. His non short term planning looks highly questionable, and his trading looks abhorrent.