Speculation: Roster Building Thread - Part XIII (Nanaki edition)

bhamill

Registered User
Sponsor
Apr 16, 2012
4,770
5,960
Probably not. But that's the second time a player has taken a shot at one of ours and he got them back harder. Ed's spot in the lineup is as solid as can be in my opinion. I like him a lot and he is willing to get guys back with physicality. Thats the kind of toughness you need. Not just fights.
Yup. Take the number and then take the opportunity for a big hit later. Especially if you are looking to respond to a clean hit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrAlmost

lakeshirts37

Registered User
Jun 25, 2019
1,154
1,207
i'm really mad now, knowing how possible this was and how much better it would be right now:

Miller-Fox
Schneider-Walker
Jones-Roy

those don't even have to be the pairs, you could put anyone with anyone and it'd still be good.
goddamnit. Drury should be fired.
It wasnt possible though
 

RGY

Kreid or Die
Jul 18, 2005
24,790
14,100
Long Island, NY
I love how fans on a message board react when trades don’t go down immediately after a report comes out here or another report comes out there. All the sudden Drury, who has been viewed as tight lipped with things close to the vest, is no longer viewed as such because additional info isn’t leaking out like a bad faucet.
 

grachevsceiling

Registered User
Jul 2, 2024
85
160
I love how fans on a message board react when trades don’t go down immediately after a report comes out here or another report comes out there. All the sudden Drury, who has been viewed as tight lipped with things close to the vest, is no longer viewed as such because additional info isn’t leaking out like a bad faucet.
Can’t speak for anyone else but personally I’d rather he communicate his vision with the fans in a direct way. That’s different than “leaking” things about specific trades or contracts, which might undercut his leverage, etc. Quite frankly though, in our current media/information zeitgeist, it’s naive to think there is anything such as “tight lipped”. If you don’t communicate a narrative, somebody else will do it for you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CLW

duhmetreE

Blessed Bigly
Sponsor
Jan 18, 2012
34,581
52,559
I'm pretty sure Staios had Jensen earmarked for whatever reason because yes, you could get "more" for Chychrun.

For what it's worth, he wasn't wrong, Jensen's been really good while Chychrun got hurt yet again.


It was Roy or Walker.
Chychrun played 19 out of 24? He would have replaced Lindgren. 3 goals and 7pts over the last 5 games could have been useful
 

eco's bones

Registered User
Jul 21, 2005
26,865
13,886
Elmira NY
Not one lead not one snippet not one credible source not even a good rumor has broken since Drury fake roared in public. Now he’s stuck with no leverage and it appears the league has told him to keep his shit in his yard.

Leverage really isn't much of a thing. Drury's under no obligation to undersell on Kreider or Kakko and Trouba is going to be a tough sell wherever. The optimal time for dealing him is this summer anyway when he'll have one year remaining on his deal. Most teams now are a bit cap strapped for this year. Some teams Jacob (and Chris?) can block deals to. Non playoff teams do not need an expensive d-man with not much term left. Kreider and Kakko would be much easier to move. Lindgren would be easier to move. That said for what? I'd want it to be worth it and not just because and the Rangers if they still plan on making the playoffs are going to need guys to fill the holes of anyone they move.

For the most part I think the threat was to the players. Shape up or get shipped out. That doesn't mean he's actually going to make a trade. It only means something like that might happen and it's to tell other teams if they have offers to make to feel free to make them. If you move a guy too you don't want to undersell them.
 

Ad

Ad

Ad