nsvoyageurs
Registered User
Matthew Tkachuk yes; Brady Tkachuk, bleep no. LolNot a chance
Matthew Tkachuk yes; Brady Tkachuk, bleep no. LolNot a chance
Job security hack.The Never-Ending Rebuild.
Not a Snowflake in Hell chance that Ottawa would do it...maybe if we added Miller and a pick to even it out . Tkachuk does so much more that Laf will never be able to do. It is not all measured in points despite what some think . They just don't understand and likely have never played the game PERIOD . There is not one GM or coach in the league that would not deal Laf for Tkachuk....not one !
New toy syndrome.Then why does the Ottawa board want to trade Tkachuk for Laf 1 for 1?
Then why does the Ottawa board want to make that trade? See below:Not a Snowflake in Hell chance that Ottawa would do it...maybe if we added Miller and a pick to even it out . Tkachuk does so much more that Laf will never be able to do. It is not all measured in points despite what some think . They just don't understand and likely have never played the game PERIOD . There is not one GM or coach in the league that would not deal Laf for Tkachuk....not one !
If they move Brady, they will want a sure thing coming back.
I am going to call it now. Brady Tkachuk for Alexis Lafreniere. He wore #11 in Junior, and apparently Melnyk and Dorion pushed hard to try and get him in 2020 but the Rangers wanted the Stutzle pick and Tkachuk.
You can only avoid the French Canadian superstar to Ottawa timeline for so long. Gatineau and Orleans need a hero if we're ever going to stop the next generation from cheering for the Montreal Toilets.
For the Rangers, the cap works out next year since Lafreniere's big extension will kick in. So there is only about 1M difference between the two. They don't care that Tkachuk is only signed 3 more years after this season, because their window to win is now and as a world class city/org in the biggest market, they don't have to worry about Tkachuk walking.
The Senators do it because once Tkachuk's NMC kicks in, they aren't getting a piece like Lafreniere, even if that's a downgrade in the short term (although, he could surpass Tkachuk). Lafreniere is locked down for another 7 years, where as if they keep Tkachuk, even if he doesn't want out now, they have to start thinking about trading him in a season or two anyways if he won't re-sign here. Add in the marketing potential of Lafreniere when they are trying to capture the Gatineau/Orleans fanbase. Daigle 2.0 in that regard.
Lastly, AND MOST IMPORTANTLY, it gets Tkachuk's wife close to New Jersey. I think if both management teams were at a crossroads, one look at her Instragram would melt their hearts and convince them to bridge the gap and get the deal done so that she could be closer to home. I know people think GMs are mainly concerned with on ice matters, but anybody who has ascended beyond being a mere "fan" and is more of an enthusiast for the management side of the game understands how important it is for the teams to create a situation where the player's wives have good vibes all around.
Most GMs have shadow Instagram accounts that they use to follow the players wives so that they can see what mantras or slogans are being posted, the moment they see a "if you can't take me at my worst you dont deserve me at my best", they know that they need might need to make a move to improve the bottom pairing D, because even if the wife doesn't know it, spouting a mantra like that on Instagram as a grown woman in 2024 is a pretty good indication that while Travis Hamonic is a respected veteran, his lower footspeed and reaction time makes it far too easy for rival teams to forecheck against him.
The above is why I would expect a Tkachuk for Lafreniere trade.
Not to mention that despite it not being measured in points... Tkachuk is better at that tooNot a Snowflake in Hell chance that Ottawa would do it...maybe if we added Miller and a pick to even it out . Tkachuk does so much more that Laf will never be able to do. It is not all measured in points despite what some think . They just don't understand and likely have never played the game PERIOD . There is not one GM or coach in the league that would not deal Laf for Tkachuk....not one !
Laf out produced BT at ES last season.Then why does the Ottawa board want to make that trade? See below:
Then why does the Ottawa board want to make that trade? See below:
And from the rangers side it would be stupid.That isn't the "board" wanting to make the trade.
That is me pitching a trade concept for if Tkachuk wants out, and why it works for both sides.
While I sometimes do view myself as a perpetual Hart candidate on the Sens board, it's a team effort over there. I'm not the entire board. I won't name any names other than Aragorn, but we have many great posters. We're a team.
The concept of the trade was predicated on the Senators missing the playoffs, and Tkachuk wanting out. The Senators would be in a position where they need to get the best piece back before July 1st, because once his NMC kicks in, the trade market will be a lot more difficult. The purpose of the proposal was not that Lafreniere is as valuable as Tkachuk 1 for 1 on paper. But in this context, Lafreniere would be an excellent return.
And from the rangers side it would be stupid.
Laf is more controlled but still plays with an edge.
Laf is the better offensive talent.
Laf is cheaper and has an extra 3 years on his deal.
Ottawa wants to do Tkachuk and an unprotected first, now things get interesting.
It will take an actual overpay to move Laf. We have zero incentive to do it especially for someone like Tkachuk.
Just think of the potential memes!I could live with a third pair of Mancini and Mario Ferraro.
I was quoted an brought here.
I said my peace.
I said my peace.
Sorry, I thought I saw several posts on the Sens in favor of trading BT for Laf. I looked through it quickly for an example because the proposal came up here and grabbed yours - I was in transit and rushing.That isn't the "board" wanting to make the trade.
That is me pitching a trade concept for if Tkachuk wants out, and why it works for both sides.
While I sometimes do view myself as a perpetual Hart candidate on the Sens board, it's a team effort over there. I'm not the entire board. I won't name any names other than Aragorn, but we have many great posters. We're a team.
The concept of the trade was predicated on the Senators missing the playoffs, and Tkachuk wanting out. The Senators would be in a position where they need to get the best piece back before July 1st, because once his NMC kicks in, the trade market will be a lot more difficult. The purpose of the proposal was not that Lafreniere is as valuable as Tkachuk 1 for 1 on paper. But in this context, Lafreniere would be an excellent return.
Sure. Except your initial point has was basically "laf french/ Tkachuk american"
You talked about "win now" for the rangers, and I pointed out, Laf helps the rangers win more than Tkachuk helps the sens win.
Laf is the better offensive player NOW. And younger, and cheaper.
So unless you have something to refute that point, your "peace" is as badly thought out as you using the word "peace" instead of piece.
Dump the vets and make Cuylle captain
How is Laf the better offensive player? Tkachuk has more points than Laf, even if you talk even strength points they are tied despite Tkachuk not playing with Panarin. In Tkachuk’s last 2 seasons he had virtually as many points as Laf in his entire career combinedSure. Except your initial point has was basically "laf french/ Tkachuk american"
You talked about "win now" for the rangers, and I pointed out, Laf helps the rangers win more than Tkachuk helps the sens win.
Laf is the better offensive player NOW. And younger, and cheaper.
So unless you have something to refute that point, your "peace" is as badly thought out as you using the word "peace" instead of piece.