Don't think you can waive him...that's considered "movement" and he has NMC (although limited).I’d assume he’d be waived if he tried to block a trade again.
Don't think you can waive him...that's considered "movement" and he has NMC (although limited).I’d assume he’d be waived if he tried to block a trade again.
Can people get the f*** over the Trouba thing?
He’ll be gone next summer
Funny enough, when Lindgren was out of the lineup, and he was paired with Schneider, their pair was a net positive.Thing is I want our team to win or at least play good hockey & his cruddy game prevents that. His presence in the lineup is a continual irritant. I agree that fault here lies w Ranger management and not the player, but as a fan that doesn't make much difference.
Do we know this? And even if true, it's still throwing another year away.
He has a limited NTC, not a NMC. He can certainly be waived. That's what they did with Goodrow.Don't think you can waive him...that's considered "movement" and he has NMC (although limited).
He can be waived.He has a limited NTC, not a NMC. He can certainly be waived. That's what they did with Goodrow.
totally normal response!He signed a multi million dollar contract. He got paid more due to us being able to trade him. With all due respect I don't give a shit about his family. Seriously couldn't two f***s. Does he give a shit about my family?
Not sure why you're replying to me with this. All I said is he can be waived, I wasn't advocating for it.He can be waived.
If he's waived and no one claims him, he goes to hartford. He was likely going to be unclaimed because of the "threat to not report"
If he goes to hartford we save something like 1.2 million on the cap and thats it. We would then need to replace him on the roster, and guess what, that would've been more than 1.2 million.
The point of moving him is to actually save cap space.
totally normal response!
That was an unfounded rumor. If you know of any reputable outlet that can confirm that I’ll change my mind.Why do people keep repeating this? He threatened to not report to camp with any team he got traded to including ones not on his no trade list.
No idea who you're replying to, but if you're talking the Trouba stuff, it was a brooks report, which is why most of us with 2 working brain cells keep telling people its BS.That was an unfounded rumor. If you know of any reputable outlet that can confirm that I’ll change my mind.
I stand corrected. Thanks.He has a limited NTC, not a NMC. He can certainly be waived. That's what they did with Goodrow.
Why do people keep repeating this? He threatened to not report to camp with any team he got traded to including ones not on his no trade list.
If he refuses to report, likely the contract is terminated. He loses out on his money.Completely refuted by Vince.
However, Brooks DID report this -
'Larry Brooks reports that, in efforts to avoid being traded, Jacob Trouba got the word out around the league that he would not report anywhere he was sent to, whether it was on his 15-team no-trade list or not, which forced the Rangers to change course on their entire offseason plan to use opened cap to add to their forward group.
“There were multiple interested parties. The Blueshirts were going to trade their captain. Until, that is, verifiable word circulated quickly through the league that Trouba had no interest in reporting if traded — anywhere.”'
Not sure who to believe in this case.
And, in any event, it's likely that the agent got instructions from Trouba to avoid a trade if at all possible. This means it's likely the agent a.) took a look at who was a possible match b.) took a look at the teams that had no shot because of their cap situation and c.) came up with 15 teams that might've been possible and 17 that likely could never make it work.
Personally, I doubt the "refuse to report" shit because it just would've rolled over to the following year (ie... he wouldn't play for a year but would still have the same contract length and term remaining and damaged, irreversibly, years of NHL career and money in the future.
If he refuses to report, likely the contract is terminated. He loses out on his money.
Not "he has to play there 2 more years.
again for the Nth time, if he's traded and refuses to report (as per the allegation) he's not the rangers problem. When you use "the rangers' in a sentence referring to this situation, it gives me the impression you don't actually understand what's being discussed here.No it's not unless the Rangers initiate that. If they do nothing he just loses that year and his contract just skips a year.
Yeah a bullshit artistTrouba is an artist, some of you will never understand…
again for the Nth time, if he's traded and refuses to report (as per the allegation) he's not the rangers problem. When you use "the rangers' in a sentence referring to this situation, it gives me the impression you don't actually understand what's being discussed here.
Reading comprehension is not your strong suit eh?Yes, you're the only one that gives a f*** about this guy's family. He's just a dude playing a game for a team I like. I give as much of a f*** about his family as he does mine. Get off your high horse.
NO!How we get zegras? We need this