Speculation: Roster Building Thread - Part XIII (Nanaki edition)

mandiblesofdoom

Registered User
May 24, 2012
2,561
1,697
Can people get the f*** over the Trouba thing?

Thing is I want our team to win or at least play good hockey & his cruddy game prevents that. His presence in the lineup is a continual irritant. I agree that fault here lies w Ranger management and not the player, but as a fan that doesn't make much difference.

He’ll be gone next summer

Do we know this? And even if true, it's still throwing another year away.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CLW

IDvsEGO

Registered User
Oct 11, 2016
5,155
5,072
Thing is I want our team to win or at least play good hockey & his cruddy game prevents that. His presence in the lineup is a continual irritant. I agree that fault here lies w Ranger management and not the player, but as a fan that doesn't make much difference.



Do we know this? And even if true, it's still throwing another year away.
Funny enough, when Lindgren was out of the lineup, and he was paired with Schneider, their pair was a net positive.

I dont think its Trouba. I think its the pairing w Miller.
Trouba doesn't look slow (the thing that usually causes this kind of drop off).
 
  • Like
Reactions: Harbour Dog

IDvsEGO

Registered User
Oct 11, 2016
5,155
5,072
He has a limited NTC, not a NMC. He can certainly be waived. That's what they did with Goodrow.
He can be waived.
If he's waived and no one claims him, he goes to hartford. He was likely going to be unclaimed because of the "threat to not report"

If he goes to hartford we save something like 1.2 million on the cap and thats it. We would then need to replace him on the roster, and guess what, that would've been more than 1.2 million.

The point of moving him is to actually save cap space.
 

Boris Zubov

No relation to Sergei, Joe
May 6, 2016
18,954
26,261
Back on the east coast
He can be waived.
If he's waived and no one claims him, he goes to hartford. He was likely going to be unclaimed because of the "threat to not report"

If he goes to hartford we save something like 1.2 million on the cap and thats it. We would then need to replace him on the roster, and guess what, that would've been more than 1.2 million.

The point of moving him is to actually save cap space.
Not sure why you're replying to me with this. All I said is he can be waived, I wasn't advocating for it.

Regardless, if they did waive him, it would probably with the intention that they have an agreement with another team to claim him.
 

haohmaru

boomshakalaka
Aug 26, 2009
17,010
11,606
Fleming Island, Fl
Why do people keep repeating this? He threatened to not report to camp with any team he got traded to including ones not on his no trade list.

Completely refuted by Vince.

However, Brooks DID report this -

'Larry Brooks reports that, in efforts to avoid being traded, Jacob Trouba got the word out around the league that he would not report anywhere he was sent to, whether it was on his 15-team no-trade list or not, which forced the Rangers to change course on their entire offseason plan to use opened cap to add to their forward group.
“There were multiple interested parties. The Blueshirts were going to trade their captain. Until, that is, verifiable word circulated quickly through the league that Trouba had no interest in reporting if traded — anywhere.”'

Not sure who to believe in this case.

And, in any event, it's likely that the agent got instructions from Trouba to avoid a trade if at all possible. This means it's likely the agent a.) took a look at who was a possible match b.) took a look at the teams that had no shot because of their cap situation and c.) came up with 15 teams that might've been possible and 17 that likely could never make it work.

Personally, I doubt the "refuse to report" shit because it just would've rolled over to the following year (ie... he wouldn't play for a year but would still have the same contract length and term remaining and damaged, irreversibly, years of NHL career and money in the future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lion Hound

IDvsEGO

Registered User
Oct 11, 2016
5,155
5,072
Completely refuted by Vince.

However, Brooks DID report this -

'Larry Brooks reports that, in efforts to avoid being traded, Jacob Trouba got the word out around the league that he would not report anywhere he was sent to, whether it was on his 15-team no-trade list or not, which forced the Rangers to change course on their entire offseason plan to use opened cap to add to their forward group.
“There were multiple interested parties. The Blueshirts were going to trade their captain. Until, that is, verifiable word circulated quickly through the league that Trouba had no interest in reporting if traded — anywhere.”'

Not sure who to believe in this case.

And, in any event, it's likely that the agent got instructions from Trouba to avoid a trade if at all possible. This means it's likely the agent a.) took a look at who was a possible match b.) took a look at the teams that had no shot because of their cap situation and c.) came up with 15 teams that might've been possible and 17 that likely could never make it work.

Personally, I doubt the "refuse to report" shit because it just would've rolled over to the following year (ie... he wouldn't play for a year but would still have the same contract length and term remaining and damaged, irreversibly, years of NHL career and money in the future.
If he refuses to report, likely the contract is terminated. He loses out on his money.
Not "he has to play there 2 more years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lindberg Cheese

haohmaru

boomshakalaka
Aug 26, 2009
17,010
11,606
Fleming Island, Fl
If he refuses to report, likely the contract is terminated. He loses out on his money.
Not "he has to play there 2 more years.

No it's not unless the Rangers initiate that. If they do nothing he just loses that year and his contract just skips a year.

Ie... if a player refuses to go to the AHL the team retains his NHL rights even if he sits out for the year as if he never played that year.
 

IDvsEGO

Registered User
Oct 11, 2016
5,155
5,072
No it's not unless the Rangers initiate that. If they do nothing he just loses that year and his contract just skips a year.
again for the Nth time, if he's traded and refuses to report (as per the allegation) he's not the rangers problem. When you use "the rangers' in a sentence referring to this situation, it gives me the impression you don't actually understand what's being discussed here.
 

haohmaru

boomshakalaka
Aug 26, 2009
17,010
11,606
Fleming Island, Fl
again for the Nth time, if he's traded and refuses to report (as per the allegation) he's not the rangers problem. When you use "the rangers' in a sentence referring to this situation, it gives me the impression you don't actually understand what's being discussed here.

If he refuses to report then the team he's refusing to report to can either terminate the contract or sit and wait until he does report and his contract doesn't age. The team doesn't matter. If he doesn't report to the Rangers, or any other team, that holds true.
 

lakeshirts37

Registered User
Jun 25, 2019
1,073
1,120
Yes, you're the only one that gives a f*** about this guy's family. He's just a dude playing a game for a team I like. I give as much of a f*** about his family as he does mine. Get off your high horse.
Reading comprehension is not your strong suit eh?

I never said I cared about his family - just provided his reasoning, which I happen to agree with.

For “just a dude playing a game on a team you like” you’re acting like a f***ing child.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: leetch99

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad