Speculation: Roster Building Thread - Part XIII (Nanaki edition)

kovazub94

Enigmatic
Aug 5, 2010
13,288
8,965
So Mika gets rewarded with bad play by getting our best wingers. He will bring them down. Lavi is a clown.
I don’t look at this as a reward. It’s obvious that if Zibanejad doesn’t get going the Rangers won’t be good enough to compete against the true contenders (other issues aside). So I don’t have a problem with trying to see if putting him in between our best wingers will have this effect.

Not satisfied until Laf is on PP1. I dont want to hear the excuses. Laf is a better hockey player than Zib right now. I cant imagine an argument that Zib is bringing more to that unit than Laf would right now.
You’d have a stronger argument if Lafreniere was a righty.
 

kovazub94

Enigmatic
Aug 5, 2010
13,288
8,965
I do not understand the wailing about the D pairs at all.

They have given up 33, 46, and 41 SOG the last 3 games. Of course they are going to go back to comfort pairings. Is this everyones first time following hockey or something.
Fox needs a strong defensive partner and unfortunately we don’t have it at LD. Miller is ultimately a better option for now only because him and Fox can keep the puck in the offensive zone but when they are defending - it’s where’s an issue.

Similar outrage id imagine.
Let’s see
 

Bacon Artemi Bravo

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Sep 20, 2007
7,581
11,249
You’d have a stronger argument if Lafreniere was a righty.
Absolutely not. That unit is already 4 righties and 1 lefty. Now you go 3 and 2. It's more balanced. Panarin can shoot from that side. Laf can shoot from the right boards. But both of those guys can also play anywhere on that unit and be great.

You'd literally be taking what is one of the best lines in hockey 10-16-13 and adding the best net front man in the league in Kreider and one of the best PPQBs in the league in Fox. I haven't heard a good argument to not make this change yet.
 

IDvsEGO

Registered User
Oct 11, 2016
5,125
5,034
Absolutely not. That unit is already 4 righties and 1 lefty. Now you go 3 and 2. It's more balanced. Panarin can shoot from that side. Laf can shoot from the right boards. But both of those guys can also play anywhere on that unit and be great.

You'd literally be taking what is one of the best lines in hockey 10-16-13 and adding the best net front man in the league in Kreider and one of the best PPQBs in the league in Fox. I haven't heard a good argument to not make this change yet.
That’s not actually how this works.

Adding a lefty to any spot changes where the pass is received and where it comes from.

Mika in that specific spot has a 1 timer because it doesn’t come across his body.
Laf in that spot doesn’t.

Laf would need to be in the opposite bumper for a 1 timer, and that’s panarins spot.
 

80shockeywasbuns

Registered User
Feb 12, 2022
1,914
3,322
That’s not actually how this works.

Adding a lefty to any spot changes where the pass is received and where it comes from.

Mika in that specific spot has a 1 timer because it doesn’t come across his body.
Laf in that spot doesn’t.

Laf would need to be in the opposite bumper for a 1 timer, and that’s panarins spot.
You’re gonna tell people that’s not how it works and then say stuff like “opposite bumper” lmao

When a NYR vet sucks ass for a long period of time the lines all need to be changed to “get them going”. When NYR rookies struggle out of the gate the team gives them a Brendan Lemieux and says pull yourself up by your bootstraps bud
 

gump116

Registered User
Sponsor
Feb 24, 2009
643
471
New York
that was my thread. the thing about Walman is that you're getting 2 playoff runs out of him at a reasonable cap number - one i think we can fit.
Yeah it’s exactly the kind of contract they need. It’s wild that the red wings had to throw in a 2nd to get rid of him last summer. Hindsight is 20-20, but we should’ve just taken him and the pick and non-tendered Lindgren
 

KirkAlbuquerque

#WeNeverGetAGoodCoach
Mar 12, 2014
36,052
42,960
New York
That’s not actually how this works.

Adding a lefty to any spot changes where the pass is received and where it comes from.

Mika in that specific spot has a 1 timer because it doesn’t come across his body.
Laf in that spot doesn’t.

Laf would need to be in the opposite bumper for a 1 timer, and that’s panarins spot.
Panarin should be in Mika’s spot he’s gota a better one timer anyway
 

SnowblindNYR

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Nov 16, 2011
54,579
33,871
Brooklyn, NY
People saying they don't understand why we're upset at the D pairs? They were fine before Lindgren's cancer infected the team. He got moved to the second pair for no reason and meanwhile Schneider-Trouba were good. But we needed the warrior whose best attribute is bleeding on the ice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UnSandvich

IDvsEGO

Registered User
Oct 11, 2016
5,125
5,034
Panarin should be in Mika’s spot he’s gota a better one timer anyway
Panarin isn’t a primary shooter, he’s got a good one timer, but Mika does generate more on his shot than Panarin.

You’re gonna tell people that’s not how it works and then say stuff like “opposite bumper” lmao

When a NYR vet sucks ass for a long period of time the lines all need to be changed to “get them going”. When NYR rookies struggle out of the gate the team gives them a Brendan Lemieux and says pull yourself up by your bootstraps bud
Said bumper meant circle.

And great analysis, bad coaches let kids figure it out themselves. Lavi doesn’t do that. The guys who’ve struggled talk about the film that they get shown.

So you want to criticize, that’s fine but assuming that Lavi isn’t showing everyone film, when everyone has called out how much film they’ve been watching, seems like you can’t figure out that Quinn and gallant aren’t our coaches anymore.
 

JohnC

Registered User
Jan 26, 2013
8,723
6,511
New York
TBH I'd give it two weeks until this powerplay setup is just as good as the one we've been married to for years now

20

10 16 13

23
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad