Speculation: Roster Building Thread - Part XIII (Nanaki edition)

Ruggs225

Registered User
Oct 15, 2007
9,086
5,251
Long Island, NY
Eh, I think if we are looking at the mold of Mackinnon and McDavid it's clearly a 'no' but in fairness, Panarin, Lafreniere and Kreider are what I would call good to elite 1st line wingers.

I have a much higher standard of elite

Panarin is Elite
Laf is on his way but still in the very good category
Kreider is squarely in the very good category.

Only 1 is an elite 1st line wingers.

Kreider has never been elite first line. Elite 2nd line i give u. But not close to elite 1st line.

An elite person has to drive the play. Kreider has never driven the play. He is a complimentary player. Always has been. Those are not elite. The only elite part of Kreiders game is tip ins, and straight line speed.
 

NYR Viper

Registered User
Sep 9, 2007
47,753
18,262
Jacksonville, FL
I have a much higher standard of elite

Panarin is Elite
Laf is on his way but still in the very good category
Kreider is squarely in the very good category.

Only 1 is an elite 1st line wingers.

Kreider has never been elite first line. Elite 2nd line i give u. But not close to elite 1st line.

An elite person has to drive the play. Kreider has never driven the play. He is a complimentary player. Always has been. Those are not elite. The only elite part of Kreiders game is tip ins, and straight line speed.

His production is towards the top of the league. Whether he does it while looking pretty isn't really necessary

As I said, good to elite 1st line wingers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SnowblindNYR

Ruggs225

Registered User
Oct 15, 2007
9,086
5,251
Long Island, NY
His production is towards the top of the league. Whether he does it while looking pretty isn't really necessary

As I said, good to elite 1st line wingers.
I though u said elite. Missed the good part.

I think if we go the build through the wing route we need a better and tougher dcore. We are super soft on the backend.

Its definitely harder to build without a top center. We have the makings of a shutdown line in our third line which will help immensely.

But zib is just killing us lately. Its hard if he isnt performing at at 1st line level and he just isnt.

Love trocheck, but i dont think he can be the best center on a cup team. Zib needs to step up.

Then we need to address top 4 d, particularly LD.
 
  • Love
Reactions: leetch99

IDvsEGO

Registered User
Oct 11, 2016
5,100
4,963
I have a much higher standard of elite

Panarin is Elite
Laf is on his way but still in the very good category
Kreider is squarely in the very good category.

Only 1 is an elite 1st line wingers.

Kreider has never been elite first line. Elite 2nd line i give u. But not close to elite 1st line.

An elite person has to drive the play. Kreider has never driven the play. He is a complimentary player. Always has been. Those are not elite. The only elite part of Kreiders game is tip ins, and straight line speed.
Hard to argue a guy who scored 50 goals who doesn’t drive play to any degree at an elite level.
 

IDvsEGO

Registered User
Oct 11, 2016
5,100
4,963
One time in his career. Is zach hyman elite too?

There is a major difference between guys like panarin, pasta, kuch, kane, marchand, ovechkin etc. And kreider. If u cant see it, thats u.
I think your definition of driving play is very narrow.
 

bernmeister

Registered User
Jun 11, 2010
28,573
4,157
Da Big Apple
I have a much higher standard of elite

Panarin is Elite
Laf is on his way but still in the very good category
Kreider is squarely in the very good category.

Only 1 is an elite 1st line wingers.

Kreider has never been elite first line. Elite 2nd line i give u. But not close to elite 1st line.

An elite person has to drive the play. Kreider has never driven the play. He is a complimentary player. Always has been. Those are not elite. The only elite part of Kreiders game is tip ins, and straight line speed.
disagree
he is def driver of play
he puck into the zone
he is not an optimal facilitator and except for tip ins on PP, is not a sniper->scorer
but he is def is driver of play
 

Guyute

Registered User
Sponsor
Feb 17, 2013
1,920
2,255
Zegras has been a mess ever since the Ducks moved him to wing. Between the position change and his injuries last year, I'm sure his confidence is shot.
 

Ruggs225

Registered User
Oct 15, 2007
9,086
5,251
Long Island, NY
I think your definition of driving play is very narrow.
Maybe it is, and it probably is more on a play making side, or can wow you with moves and create something out of nothing. Neither of which is his game.

But kreider has always gone through invisible stretches for most of his career where for games at a time u couldnt tell if he was on ice. Its less frequent now, but it still happens to often for my tastes to call him elite.

To me he is more complement than a person who drives the play and creates the offense. He does capitalize on what is presented to him especially around the goal.

To me elite is best of the best. And he at his best is still below that level. I go by the rule, if u have to think a guy is elite or make a case for him being elite, he isnt elite.
 
  • Like
Reactions: leetch99

Paulie Walnutz

Make HF Great Again
Oct 1, 2008
10,863
8,552
I said it in the PGT, I think the slightest change they should try without ruining chemistry is flipping Mika and Chytil. Cuylle and Kakko can do their board play without Mika getting in the way because we know Mika doesn’t battle there. And maybe they can find Mika for shots. Chytil can then help that line transition up the ice since Kreider sucks at that and resorts to dump and chase a lot.
 

SnowblindNYR

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Nov 16, 2011
54,412
33,658
Brooklyn, NY
I said it in the PGT, I think the slightest change they should try without ruining chemistry is flipping Mika and Chytil. Cuylle and Kakko can do their board play without Mika getting in the way because we know Mika doesn’t battle there. And maybe they can find Mika for shots. Chytil can then help that line transition up the ice since Kreider sucks at that and resorts to dump and chase a lot.

The obvious fear is the sum of the parts will be less this way.
 

bernmeister

Registered User
Jun 11, 2010
28,573
4,157
Da Big Apple
I said it in the PGT, I think the slightest change they should try without ruining chemistry is flipping Mika and Chytil. Cuylle and Kakko can do their board play without Mika getting in the way because we know Mika doesn’t battle there. And maybe they can find Mika for shots. Chytil can then help that line transition up the ice since Kreider sucks at that and resorts to dump and chase a lot.
you want to try this in practice and road test it in a game vs a weaker opponent, fine
BUT
it IS signif risk to ruin chemistry

At one pt in the game [not sure this is still current]. said {kid line} is 9 Gs scored and ZERO vs in 5x5
you futz with that and you may be effed

if it ain't broke...

while in theory a correct RW might help, I am inclined to go for a better C and slide zib to RW

ducks not moving Zegras sooner than later even tho they are deep at pivot

my hope is something around Byfield + Shesterkin
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad