Are we really comparing Mika’s career offensive production to Kakko’s? Are we going to cherry pick the one obscure stat that shows Kakko is a better offensive player than Mika? Even in a mediocre year Mika put up way more points. And no, I don’t think Kakko being undeservedly put on PP1 suddenly makes him an 80 point player.
Not much of a “defensive stalwart” if your extremely experienced head coach doesn’t consider Kakko one of his 6 best PK’ers.
It’s amazing to me that some people search high and low to defend Kakko’s disappointing career as being everyone else’s fault but his. I wouldn’t give him away, but if the right offer came along, then I’d be happy to move on.
Lets take them point by point here.
No im not comparing mika's career to kakko's career. Kakko is 23. Lets compare things at age 23 for each of them.
Age 23 Mika's career high was 17 ES goals, and 21 Assists in his age 22 season (he was then injured and missed 20+ games at 23 but we can compare those if you'd like).
Age 23 Kakko's carrer high was also in his age 22 season.
18 ES goals and 19 ES assists.
The kicker in this is Mika at 22 got 17 minutes including PP time. Kakko got 15 minutes including PP time.
Also not much of a defensive stalwart. Well we've seen over and over again, that NHL coaches are always going to trust vet forwards on the PK far more than they will rookies.
I agree he should be on it. I have no control over what a coach does.
NHL Coaches have shown to make decisions that favor vet players even if it costs a team wins.
Please see nick bonino at 3c. Please see Laf's entire career with last season as the exception.
This board is constantly gripping about coaching decisions, but now, we have someone who is arguing that its the players fault.