East Coast Bias
Registered User
Yeah I’m not even listening to offers for 1oa. We have been waiting for this forever. Don’t even entertain trying to get cute.
can someone get me caught up here? Was something dropped last night involving 1oa?
I’m a bit confused as to why Tkachuk + 5 is so outlandish. You’re moving down 4 spots while also adding a physical 6’4 21 year old who is already pretty much a 50 point center. Lafreniere looks like a great prospect but as we’ve seen with Hughes, Kakko, Hischier, etc. putting up 45+ as a rookie isn’t exactly in the bag. Tkachuk has two seasons of 45 points in 71 games and is a physical specimen and a young center, which we need much more than a winger. Could there be pluses in the deal to fine tune it? Sure, but I don’t know that I’d balk at Tkachuk + 5. Draft picks are so f***ing overrated these days.
This kid is 21, listed at 6’4 212, credited with 477 hits in his 142 career games, which would destroy the totals for any Ranger in that time frame and looks, easily, like a 70+ point power forward center going forward.
no just more people thinking up trade ideascan someone get me caught up here? Was something dropped last night involving 1oa?
thank you, that would not be enough for me to do itDave Maloney on Sirius/XM said giving up 1OA for Brady Tkachuk and 5OA would be a good trade for the Rangers. Nothing substantive.
Committing big money to Torey Krug is a disaster in the making.
Yeah I’m not even listening to offers for 1oa. We have been waiting for this forever. Don’t even entertain trying to get cute.
Dave Maloney on Sirius/XM said giving up 1OA for Brady Tkachuk and 5OA would be a good trade for the Rangers. Nothing substantive.
And those 3 pieces probably help out more than just Laf but I'm all in on having this high scoring alpha dog on the ice for us. I think he's going to change the make up of this team over the next couple of years. That to me is more important especially with how deep we are with young NHL talent and our prospect pool.I think majority of fans think almost nothing will be enough for 1OA. Same goes for me. Already made myself commit to Lafreniere fully and almost every trade scenario would make me only sad. Ottawa #3, #5 and Tkachuk is more than reasonable trade on paper, but i still would have hard time to accept that.
Cirelli isn’t a difference maker? You can just stop now.
That’s a deal I make ONLY if I know LA is going StuzleYou guys are crazy if you wouldn't accept Tkachuk, the #3, AND the #5. I mean Ottawa would never do that any way, but in this hypothetical, that is just a bonkers trade and a no brainer to me.
That’s a deal I make ONLY if I know LA is going Stuzle
Agree, that deal would be too good to pass up. Rangers would be guaranteed either Byfield or Stutzle which would cover a big missing piece for us. Tkachuk needs no introduction & chabot would solve LD. OTT would never do this in a million years.Would need something stupid like Tkachuk, Chabot and the #3. Otherwise keep the pick and draft your next franchise player.
The HELL???? Never.Would anyone here do a Kreider & deAngelo for Malkin deal?
50 points actually gets you to the top line, production wise. I was using it as a barometer as that is a number that people love to throw around.Their threshold for acceptable is beyond either of us. I know you probably are just using 50 points as a 2nd C standard base line. I think it might be a bit much to expect 50 from him this year. I personally think that they need to view him as a legit 2C by the end of next season. He may not even play much on the 2nd line, but he needs to play in such a way that they look at him as being the inevitable choice. If they have serious doubts by the end of the season, I could easily see them making other plans. Especially if they traded ADA for Glass/Krebs, which both seem to be more natural playmaking Cs.
You guys are crazy if you wouldn't accept Tkachuk, the #3, AND the #5. I mean Ottawa would never do that any way, but in this hypothetical, that is just a bonkers trade and a no brainer to me.