haohmaru
boomshakalaka
If Artemi made sense for them at 12.5/per so does Marner.
Don't see Toronto letting it happen though.
Don't see Toronto letting it happen though.
Offer sheet coming?
I don't see how MM fits with the Isles' cap situation, both where they are now and with what they have coming down the pike.
If Artemi made sense for them at 12.5/per so does Marner.
Don't see Toronto letting it happen though.
True...but this feels more like spite from Lou.Offer sheets are more about forcing your opponent to make a move, I feel
They were trying to get Panarin before they re-signed Lee.
Leafs aren't letting marner walk to the Islanders. They'll trade nylander if they have to.If Marner wants to get paid commensurate to his teammates and his peers in the game, he would absolutely sign an Offer Sheet with the Islanders at 12.5
Leafs I have no doubt would NOT match that.
I think they were trying to do both.
Not sure that's true, considering that Lee didn't get a fair offer until after Panarin signed with the Rangers.
If Marner wants to get paid commensurate to his teammates and his peers in the game, he would absolutely sign an Offer Sheet with the Islanders at 12.5
Leafs I have no doubt would NOT match that.
I don't think marner would sign that...I think he wants at least what Matthews is making...if not more.5 years for $10,568,588 AAV
It keeps the compensation below the final threshold, which will force Dubas to match
Not sure that isn't true. Neither of us can definitively say because neither of us know. They didn't sign Varlamov, either, until after Panarin was off the table.
Leafs aren't letting marner walk to the Islanders. They'll trade nylander if they have to.
...that just backs up what I'm saying.
Neither one of us is sure, but if you look at the order of events, it pretty clearly says one thing and not the other.
5 years for $10,568,588 AAV
It keeps the compensation below the final threshold, which will force Dubas to match
That's the cost of being good. You could do a lot worse than having Matthews marner and Tavares on your team for the next 5 years.I dont think trading Nylander addresses the issue of having 35 million tied up in just three players for the next 5 years
Not to mention that both Marner and Mstthews would not hit UFA the same summer.
I don't think marner would sign that...I think he wants at least what Matthews is making...if not more.
That's the cost of being good. You could do a lot worse than having Matthews marner and Tavares on your team for the next 5 years.
His leverage is he's really really good. Like top 15 in the NHL good.And what leverage does Marner have? He isn't arbitration eligible, and no team is offering him more, because no team gives up four 1st rounders.
And what leverage does Marner have? He isn't arbitration eligible, and no team is offering him more, because no team gives up four 1st rounders.
I dunno...wasn't the same thing said when the penguins gave big contracts to Crosby Malkin Fleury and Letang?But having that much cap space tied to three players (forwards specifically) will never allow you to be good enough to win
I dunno...wasn't the same thing said when the penguins gave big contracts to Crosby Malkin Fleury and Letang?
You just need to do a better job of filling in around them.
Marner at that contract fits the maple leafs time frame.
Where the leafs have screwed up is paying ancillary players and not doing a good job drafting outside of their top 10 picks.