Edge
Kris King's Ghost
I think the the timeline concerning Andersson is different for fans than it is for the Rangers.
The player was the right player for the situation. The contract was wrong.6.25M X 3 years for sub 50 point production with a full NMC.
Ask yourself, if Toronto can go back do you think they sign him knowing what they know now? I honestly don't. I respect his leadership qualities, but if you want that kind of veteran on your team you can find one for less money.
It's crazy how much the NHL has shifted from the 80's, 90's, 2000's, and the current era we're in. You do see guys playing, and playing well in their 30's, but the NHL has gotten so much younger and faster. It's a young man's game.
We are a very young team and I wouldn't mind a veteran signing. Pavelski, imo is going to cost too much and will want that extra year or two. Find me a 1 year stop gap and I won't hate it. But 3 years @ 6M with a NMC makes me queasy.
Isles make sense for Bob and Panarin
I think he'll be a solid middle 6 player. The game hasn't slowed down for him yetI feel like Andersson is going to go the way of Malhotra. Disappoint fans, get moved, and have a solid career as 3C elsewhere.
Isles make sense for Bob and Panarin
I agree with you. But it's a bit of a stretch to consider his 9 game call-up 2 years ago a 'season.'
They're gonna whiff on both and lose out on Lee and Lehner.
and then give Zucc a 5 year 32.5m contract that causes some meltdowns here
Panarin isn’t picking NY to play for the islanders let’s be real here. If he’s coming to NY it’s for us if we want him bad enough. But he’s not coming here for the islanders. I’d be shocked if bobrovsky does either. He may not even meet with the islanders.
I don't get the pavelski move at all for a few reasons.
1)he's old...meaning he doesn't fit our timeline.
2)he's still good which means a show me contract doesn't apply...he's already shown who he is.
3)we suck, which means our team doesn't fit HIS timeline.
Pavelski will easily get 7m x 3 on the open market...does that contract make the remotest sense for us? Or him for our team? We aren't winning a cup in the next 3 years barring a miracle... So why would he come here? I'd say 4 years from now is when we should move into legit contender window.
Depends what sort of contract they give Panarin. For all we know they could be willing to go 12/13 mill per and us and Panthers aren't willing to go past 10.
When’s the last time the isles signed marquee free agent by outbidding other interested teams? Or actually just when was the last time they signed a marquee free agent?
It doesn't fit our timeline as in...he won't help us win a cup during that tenure...A 2-year contract actually fits our timeline perfectly. A 3-year fits it fine, but not as perfectly. He'd be one of these guys that'd be here as a good mentor for the kids. He can play wing or center.
We'd have to overpay him to get him... that'd be the only reason from his perspective to come here. It's not likely, but I do think it's a really good idea.
I kind of think Hodwen, Chytil with Stome is a good developmental position. The former will have to work hard to beat out the latter yet it's not inconceivable, and it still gives the former shelter should it be a bumpy ride. Namestnikov can also play center need be.
The fact that you don't understand the difference between players at different ages and the body's ability to heal is alarming. That's like day 1 stuff.Let's not trade for McDavid guys. He had a knee injury and it may affect him later on.
Can't remember but they'd be stupid enough to do it.
Ffs a team in the middle of a rebuild isn't offer sheeting anyone. Come on peeps.