Again, it's a panarin thing. The guy is so entitled and he is enabled by this coaching staff. Take away his PowerPlay time and see how quickly he starts remembering the details of the game
Gallant isn't really a "details" guy. He is a guy who gives his veterans/stars a lot of room to express themselves. It's typical he lobbied the grenade from the latest debacle back to the vets. Ironically most of the Ranger's top offensive players need a structure to base their game on, from there they can improvise which is their strength. Now they (Zib, Panarin, Laffy, Kakko) are kinda lost out there, none of them really in an environment that suits their game.
- Panarin played his best hockey in a stricter environment where his quick mind could shine by doing the unexpected and "break the the pattern" everybody else on the ice follow. Currently, when we are so 'awkward' tactically, he struggles with timing like most everybody else, and he is predictable. Imo it's no surprise he was playing best with Kravtsov early on. Panarin was "coaching" him and Kravy helped him use the entire o-zone and "stretch" the ice E/W which Panarin loves.
- Zib and Kreider are fine together, but Zib is a horse that needs a RW that can spring him. Kakko played well as his RW but you can see why puck movers like Buch and Zucc are better compliments to Zib's speed game, both in the neutral zone and o-zone, which is the key area to Zib's offense. He has to play with speed.
- Kakko thrives in a mobile possession game with 5 players participating.
- Laffy needs more strength and speed, but like Zib he also needs to play with speed under his skates. If he becomes "stagnant/static" he ends up behind the game and disappears. Both are "mercurial" players that need to be in motion. Much of the complaints about Laffy imo are because he is often a step behind play bc systemic/timing/puck movement issues.
The team overall played their best at the very start of the season. They still had the post-season tempo in them, they played with about as balanced lines as they can put out, and they had a clear template to work from. Along the way all of that has been diluted by tinkering. Also the team has to find a way to keep skating against trapping teams. The wonky results, which led to tinkering, started after opponents denied the Rangers speed up the ice with the trap.
A key to improve the overall game is for the D to be smoother (=faster) on starting the transition from the D zone, it has to be immediate, and the forwards need to be better prepared how to turn up the ice as a unit and as puck support/availability for the D. That will unlock the one or two steps the players need to keep their tempo/skating up.
The team needs fine tuning in all three zones, and both PPs, but I don't see it as a talent issue.