GregSirico
KakkoSZN
Drinking already?
I'm working from home today ... drinking since noon.
Drinking already?
Drinking already?
Rangers just had their two best PP% seasons since Jagr's first season here. That that's with Stepan losing 85% of the 'crucial' draws and McDonagh being the least creative point man there is.How does this guy still have a job with the Rangers why is it no one sees this year after year the guy responsible gets absolved
I have a serious question. Our goal is to win a Stanley Cup right? Not be competitive, not win a few games, not hang around and be entertaining ... it's to win the CUP. The same goal every team should have. We would all agree on this right?
Then the next question is are we better than Pittsburgh now? NO
Is there anything we can do this year to be better than Pittsburgh? Probably not.
Why aren't we planning to make our run down the road when our cost controlled team is in it's prime and when we can plug in guys as we go along? You have to figure down the road Pittsburgh, Chicago, Washington, Columbus, and Nashville will all be on the downside. Why not strike then? What would our competition be? Edmonton probably? Toronto?
I just think this retooling thing is sort of half pleasing the fan base and half trying to do the right thing.
I have a serious question. Our goal is to win a Stanley Cup right? Not be competitive, not win a few games, not hang around and be entertaining ... it's to win the CUP. The same goal every team should have. We would all agree on this right?
Then the next question is are we better than Pittsburgh now? NO
Is there anything we can do this year to be better than Pittsburgh? Probably not.
Why aren't we planning to make our run down the road when our cost controlled team is in it's prime and when we can plug in guys as we go along? You have to figure down the road Pittsburgh, Chicago, Washington, Columbus, and Nashville will all be on the downside. Why not strike then? What would our competition be? Edmonton probably? Toronto?
I just think this retooling thing is sort of half pleasing the fan base and half trying to do the right thing.
According to Larry Brooks, the Rangers are interested in bringing both Patrick Marleau and Joe Thornton in though it's not known if either player would sign a "one-year, bonus-rich over-35" type of deal." (NY Post)
My God they would want both?....
They're not getting anyone who is better than anything they have in the top 6 on this FA market. Thornton MIGHT be better, but Hayes did have 51 points last season playing as the 3rd center, and who is Marleau better than in the top 6? gimme a break.
According to Larry Brooks, the Rangers are interested in bringing both Patrick Marleau and Joe Thornton in though it's not known if either player would sign a "one-year, bonus-rich over-35" type of deal." (NY Post)
My God they would want both?....
They're not getting anyone who is better than anything they have in the top 6 on this FA market. Thornton MIGHT be better, but Hayes did have 51 points last season playing as the 3rd center, and who is Marleau better than in the top 6? gimme a break.
Rangers just had their two best PP% seasons since Jagr's first season here. That that's with Stepan losing 85% of the 'crucial' draws and McDonagh being the least creative point man there is.
Would rather Marleau and Thornton than Bonino.The Rangers trading Stepan who is 27 (even for futures) just to bring in Joe Thornton or Patrick Marleau if its a multi year deal makes absolutely no sense..
and if its Nick bonino for 4 to 5 years they choose instead. FML.
The Rangers trading Stepan who is 27 (even for futures) just to bring in Joe Thornton or Patrick Marleau if its a multi year deal makes absolutely no sense..
and if its Nick bonino for 4 to 5 years they choose instead. FML.
And in playoffs... ?
According to Larry Brooks, the Rangers are interested in bringing both Patrick Marleau and Joe Thornton in though it's not known if either player would sign a "one-year, bonus-rich over-35" type of deal." (NY Post)
My God they would want both?....
They're not getting anyone who is better than anything they have in the top 6 on this FA market. Thornton MIGHT be better, but Hayes did have 51 points last season playing as the 3rd center, and who is Marleau better than in the top 6? gimme a break.
I guess just because he turned down Tampa Bay once doesn't mean he will again. If he would have accepted the trade to Tampa and signed an extension, he'd be giving up the opportunity to see how aggressively the NYR go after him. Now, if they are really lukewarm, it's a different story.Yes. It's basically us and NJD at this point. Not surprising
It is because this organization (and the Knicks too) are wayyyyyy too arrogant for their own good. Obsessed with the shiny new toy, always have to live up to their reputation as the team every wants to play for, that plays in the "World's Most Famous Arena".
We are pretty much caught in no mans land. Not good enough to win the Cup, not nearly bad enough to bottom out and draft at the top of the draft where all the franchise changing talent is.
Lmao odc is so far off AINEC.
Mac is awful manning the PP.
Yea lets see more of those pathetic wristers hoping for a deflection because zero velocity behind his slapshot nor can he get it through. He also goes braindead when carrying the puck up the ice after the Rangers classic drop pass to start the rush, with zero instincts to adjust when the opposing PKers are stifling it.
So your argument is that Arniel is coaching the PP worse in the playoffs?And in playoffs... ?
I guess just because he turned down Tampa Bay once doesn't mean he will again. If he would have accepted the trade to Tampa and signed an extension, he'd be giving up the opportunity to see how aggressively the NYR go after him. Now, if they are really lukewarm, it's a different story.