Speculation: Roster Building Thread DCLXXXVII: Another Thread Bites The Dust

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
  • We are currently aware of "log in/security error" issues that are affecting some users. We apologize and ask for your patience as we try to get these issues fixed.
Status
Not open for further replies.
That's why you make the defense top notch...

Mcdonagh-Shatt
Skjei-Smith
Staal/Holden- Deangelo

is better than anything the Rangers have had on the blue line in a decade.

Well there are still judgments to be made when you want to sign somebody. A 28 year old player who is not elite for 7 years for big cap $'s isn't something that usually will be categorized as a wise decision by term's end. I'm alright with the Rangers signing Shattenkirk but I'm not alright with signing him like he is an elite player who will never get old and decline. To me 5 years would be pushing it with him and FWIW I'd be a lot more comfortable with 4.
 
Brooks thinks its absurd for Shattenkirk to leave money on the table, that's why he's so adamant it wont happen.

Almost every big outlet has at one point said he would take less to play for the Rangers, how much less is the question?.. but he would be willing to take less.

Yeah, but it's Brooks. He will say the exact opposite tomorrow
 
I don't like the tire-kicking approach from Gorton to be honest. Either you want someone and go out and get him, or you don't. Shattenkirk will not be a good signing at 6.5m x 7 years and a bad signing at 7.2m x 7 years. Sure sometimes you are thight against the cap and 700k or a mil or two mil can mean a lot. But that is more about how you plan your business, if you have cap space you use it.

From my POV, the idea to not sign Shattenkirk to a mega deal -- be it 36m or 49m -- is that I don't think that he is a No 1 D, I am afraid how he will look 3-4 years into the deal, and I think that the game is turning more and more into a very mobile 5 unit skating game whereas Shatty in essence is a pretty stationary old school PPQB that works mostly on the outside. Shatty is also not a huge factor in the transiton game, albeit his stretchpasses are good. He is however not that good at turning away from a forechecker to open things up before he makes the outlet pass. He is brought up under Hitchcock and it shows. Nothing of this even remotely changes if he gets 6.2m per or 7.2m per.

On Brooks, maybe he is just reporting what he hears? So we have been very skeptical about Shatty for a long time, and Brooks have reported what he have heard and many others also have confirmed. Now he got message that we will touch base with him, kicking some tires. Don't sound farfetched to me.

I have a bit of a hard time with people that can't stop hating the few reporters covering this league just because what they write don't fit their agenda. So what, its not like Brooks have any impact whatsoever on what will happen. Some act like he is the one in charge and if he writes something they don't like they get scared and wants to attack him lol.
 
The other thing is, St. Louis had reportedly traded Shattenkirk on three separate occasions, (Edmonton, Boston and TB), and the deal fell through because Shattenkirk would not sign a long term deal. Unless the Rangers put up an inferior effort, my gut feeling is that he will be a Ranger.
 
yes

I think he'd take up to a million less per year to play here, depending of course which team offers him the 1M more per year.

yes he would good post.


Ladies, gentlemen, and hysterics,

I haven't posted in a while so have a lot of things i want to cover and cram it into this 1 post so here it goes

if you guys think we are not in on shatty or he wouldn't help that much your insane and I can't help you. This guy brings 95% exactly what this team needs. I believe, that NYR's offer is 6.25-6.5 per for 6 years. If his agent says that 7th year is a deal breaker I think we cave and give it to him. probably majority of it is frontloaded and more then likely he will have a LTC ( which i hate)

now shatty as he sits now would at least be a 5.5 mil per year defender. He is a RD, a 60pt D, Runs the point on the PP world class, Is a better skater and defender than many here give him credit for, although that is not his forte. He has an absolute low accurate howitzer from the blueline which always seems to get thru to the net, even if it doesn't go in the goalie leaves a juicy rebound. He is an ideal partner for McD. without a superstar forward, there is no one better avaliable to bring what he can to the PP. Not happy we signed smith when by all accounts Berezglaov is a younger russian version of him for cheap. He plays both sides, physical but not overly physical, moves the puck well, but will not add that much offense. Pretty much a carbon copy of smith.
for those who think deangelo can do what shatty does, your insane. he cannot, at least not right now and it is foolish to think so. Many of the hysterics hate deangelo for his past slip ups. look, the kid has immense talent, and he was a dumb kid. we all were at some point in time. he is also a jersey kid. do any of you think that having him near home near his friends and family might keep him more grounded?? I happen to think so. He should also learn a ton from shatty and McD so that would be huge, but i highly doubt he is anything more than 3rd pair 2nd PP this year. Give it a chance hysterics, he might actually wind up being one of you favorite players down the road. Gorton has said, "our D is a work in progress" I am still holding out hope he can move Staal out with a pick and prospect to a team that needs to get to the cap floor. that remains to be seen. Dallas is dying for help on D. their FWDs di not play any D, a main reason they were garbage last year. Gorts should explore Holden+Nash to the stars, I think he will get a good return. Buff is another team dying for D. Maybe Holden plus a small add for Girgensons. That would cure our 3rd line center woes. He is young, Physical, fast and has the constant motor of Zucc. He would be great as a 40-45pt 3rd line center here and they already have larrsson and have shifted Girgs to wing. Grigorenko is another interesting piece. Hanzal?? maybe depending on term and $$. I believe all 3 above are better options then thorton marleau and bonino because of what each will command.
ALso, those of you who think we are watching a full on rebuild are nuts. Hockey is a business. even if we win 1 playoff series do you have any idea How much revenue that creates?? we are not carrying all of that cap space for no reason, wise up.

now back to shatty, obviously he has an agenda. He refused to the sign and trade with tampa at 7yrs 6.5 per ( Btw stevie Y is a pretty damn good GM. If he was ready to offer that to shatty you think he knows something :amazed:) shatty turned it down. due to FLA's no state tax that would equate to us paying him 7.5 per. He knows NYR will not offer that. Logic would dictate, that the kid (already a multi millionare mind you) wants to come home to play if the money is close. 99.9999% he is a ranger .0000001 a NJD and thats only if they offer him like 8 mill per and he goes for the coin.

Now as far as everyone saying this will be a disaster in 4 years, you don't know that. I'll go you one further and say he ages better then McD.. He has no blazing speed to lose, No extensive injury history as McD,he relies on smarts, positioning and being a very gifted offensive athlete. say in 4-5 years he slows down, to what a dennis wideman, even then he would be a 3rd pair 40-50 D PP QB.... but thats way way down the line. Look at steps many on these boards were adament he would not be dealt and the rest of us were nuts... I remember them even saying i can't wait til the vegas draft is over so we can not talk about a steps trade and blah blah blah. truth is, in todays NHL it is very very hard to see more then 2-3 years down the line, there are always trades,buyout, injuries, retirements, etc way way too many variables to get lectured by some whats goin to occur 4-5 years down the road as of now this is the way I see our D in a few days


McD--Shattenkirk

Skjei--Smith

Staal/Bereglazov-DeAngelo/Bereglazov

when staal traded Bereglazov( yes i know he is a RD but can play both)---DeAngelo

Midseason our D could look like

McD--Shattenkirk

Skjei--Bereglazov/Smith

Bereglazov/ Smith--DeAngelo

do you see the template?? All are mobile and can move the puck and each pair has a guy that can be really offensive and then theres McD who is all around awesome


# 1PP Shatty

#2 PP skjei/DeAngelo rotate








I still think gorts trades staal somehow. I dunno call it a gut intuition, But i just have a feeling he has something up his sleeve

I bet we deal holden+ for our new 3rd line C


and we deal nash, maybe before the season, maybe around the deadline, but he brings back a decent return....

thats all for now folks flame away
 
Thornton is getting linked to the Rangers quite a bit as far as interest goes.

Thought we wanted to be "prudent"?
 
I don't like the tire-kicking approach from Gorton to be honest. Either you want someone and go out and get him, or you don't. Shattenkirk will not be a good signing at 6.5m x 7 years and a bad signing at 7.2m x 7 years. Sure sometimes you are thight against the cap and 700k or a mil or two mil can mean a lot. But that is more about how you plan your business, if you have cap space you use it.

From my POV, the idea to not sign Shattenkirk to a mega deal -- be it 36m or 49m -- is that I don't think that he is a No 1 D, I am afraid how he will look 3-4 years into the deal, and I think that the game is turning more and more into a very mobile 5 unit skating game whereas Shatty in essence is a pretty stationary old school PPQB that works mostly on the outside. Shatty is also not a huge factor in the transiton game, albeit his stretchpasses are good. He is however not that good at turning away from a forechecker to open things up before he makes the outlet pass. He is brought up under Hitchcock and it shows. Nothing of this even remotely changes if he gets 6.2m per or 7.2m per.

This is exactly how I feel.. He doesn't fit the mold.. Might have been a good fit when Torts was here...

I feel as if some haven't watched him play and just look at his regular season stats.
 
Larry Brooks wrote about Shattenkirk in February

Plus, the upside of yielding assets to get Shattenkirk now for what would be a quixotic run at the Cup is minimal, with the Blueshirts having the opportunity to sign him come July 1. If it’s going to take a Keith Yandle-like seven years in the $45 million range to get him under contract, no, you should not expect the Rangers to sign up for that. But if Shattenkirk would take, say, $30 million over five years to play on Broadway, that would sure change the dynamic. But don’t hold your breath.

http://nypost.com/2017/02/08/why-the-rangers-shouldnt-force-a-deal-at-the-trade-deadline/

The Rangers offered essentially the same deal to the Blues which Detroit accepted for Brendan Smith.

5 years/$30M.

NYC income taxes are high. NYC resident taxes for someone in that tax bracket.

It will take the Yandle contract to sign Shattenkirk. He would have to leave money and term on the table. So much money. The Yandle contract includes no state income tax in Florida.

Shattenkirk isn't worth 5 years/$30M. Forget about 7 years and $45M-$49M.
 
I think its about time the ones for Shattenkirk and the ones against him just agree to disagree lol.. no one has changed their opinion as long as we have been debating this.
 
Not directed at anyone here personally.. just my observation from seeing thoughts about Rangers moves for a while now..

In a nutshell, Ranger fans want better players, but also want them to come or be cheap, doesn't work that way, good players get paid.

and thats not just Shattenkirk, you know how many NOs I saw last year about Stamkos because he "would get too much money"? #1 centers are supposed to be cheap too I guess.
 
I dunno

This is exactly how I feel.. He doesn't fit the mold.. Might have been a good fit when Torts was here...

I feel as if some haven't watched him play and just look at his regular season stats.

I don't really trust Larry that much. Yea they feed him some info from time to time but who knows if its accurate or just to stir the pot.

TBH I think he lurks on here to steal Ideas from people to put in his articles. He never had any mention of Faulk until this forum had a week and a half thread about it. I am very suspicious of him and his so called information
 
Larry Brooks wrote about Shattenkirk in February



http://nypost.com/2017/02/08/why-the-rangers-shouldnt-force-a-deal-at-the-trade-deadline/

The Rangers offered essentially the same deal to the Blues which Detroit accepted for Brendan Smith.

5 years/$30M.

NYC income taxes are high. NYC resident taxes for someone in that tax bracket.

It will take the Yandle contract to sign Shattenkirk. He would have to leave money and term on the table. So much money. The Yandle contract includes no state income tax in Florida.

Shattenkirk isn't worth 5 years/$30M. Forget about 7 years and $45M-$49M.

You've been piling it on pretty thick these last few months, RB. You know, you're gonna eat a **** ton of crow on Saturday if Gorts signs Shattenkirk.
 
yes he would good post.


Ladies, gentlemen, and hysterics,

I haven't posted in a while so have a lot of things i want to cover and cram it into this 1 post so here it goes

if you guys think we are not in on shatty or he wouldn't help that much your insane and I can't help you. This guy brings 95% exactly what this team needs. I believe, that NYR's offer is 6.25-6.5 per for 6 years. If his agent says that 7th year is a deal breaker I think we cave and give it to him. probably majority of it is frontloaded and more then likely he will have a LTC ( which i hate)

now shatty as he sits now would at least be a 5.5 mil per year defender. He is a RD, a 60pt D, Runs the point on the PP world class, Is a better skater and defender than many here give him credit for, although that is not his forte. He has an absolute low accurate howitzer from the blueline which always seems to get thru to the net, even if it doesn't go in the goalie leaves a juicy rebound. He is an ideal partner for McD. without a superstar forward, there is no one better avaliable to bring what he can to the PP. Not happy we signed smith when by all accounts Berezglaov is a younger russian version of him for cheap. He plays both sides, physical but not overly physical, moves the puck well, but will not add that much offense. Pretty much a carbon copy of smith.
for those who think deangelo can do what shatty does, your insane. he cannot, at least not right now and it is foolish to think so. Many of the hysterics hate deangelo for his past slip ups. look, the kid has immense talent, and he was a dumb kid. we all were at some point in time. he is also a jersey kid. do any of you think that having him near home near his friends and family might keep him more grounded?? I happen to think so. He should also learn a ton from shatty and McD so that would be huge, but i highly doubt he is anything more than 3rd pair 2nd PP this year. Give it a chance hysterics, he might actually wind up being one of you favorite players down the road. Gorton has said, "our D is a work in progress" I am still holding out hope he can move Staal out with a pick and prospect to a team that needs to get to the cap floor. that remains to be seen. Dallas is dying for help on D. their FWDs di not play any D, a main reason they were garbage last year. Gorts should explore Holden+Nash to the stars, I think he will get a good return. Buff is another team dying for D. Maybe Holden plus a small add for Girgensons. That would cure our 3rd line center woes. He is young, Physical, fast and has the constant motor of Zucc. He would be great as a 40-45pt 3rd line center here and they already have larrsson and have shifted Girgs to wing. Grigorenko is another interesting piece. Hanzal?? maybe depending on term and $$. I believe all 3 above are better options then thorton marleau and bonino because of what each will command.
ALso, those of you who think we are watching a full on rebuild are nuts. Hockey is a business. even if we win 1 playoff series do you have any idea How much revenue that creates?? we are not carrying all of that cap space for no reason, wise up.

now back to shatty, obviously he has an agenda. He refused to the sign and trade with tampa at 7yrs 6.5 per ( Btw stevie Y is a pretty damn good GM. If he was ready to offer that to shatty you think he knows something :amazed:) shatty turned it down. due to FLA's no state tax that would equate to us paying him 7.5 per. He knows NYR will not offer that. Logic would dictate, that the kid (already a multi millionare mind you) wants to come home to play if the money is close. 99.9999% he is a ranger .0000001 a NJD and thats only if they offer him like 8 mill per and he goes for the coin.

Now as far as everyone saying this will be a disaster in 4 years, you don't know that. I'll go you one further and say he ages better then McD.. He has no blazing speed to lose, No extensive injury history as McD,he relies on smarts, positioning and being a very gifted offensive athlete. say in 4-5 years he slows down, to what a dennis wideman, even then he would be a 3rd pair 40-50 D PP QB.... but thats way way down the line. Look at steps many on these boards were adament he would not be dealt and the rest of us were nuts... I remember them even saying i can't wait til the vegas draft is over so we can not talk about a steps trade and blah blah blah. truth is, in todays NHL it is very very hard to see more then 2-3 years down the line, there are always trades,buyout, injuries, retirements, etc way way too many variables to get lectured by some whats goin to occur 4-5 years down the road as of now this is the way I see our D in a few days


McD--Shattenkirk

Skjei--Smith

Staal/Bereglazov-DeAngelo/Bereglazov

when staal traded Bereglazov( yes i know he is a RD but can play both)---DeAngelo

Midseason our D could look like

McD--Shattenkirk

Skjei--Bereglazov/Smith

Bereglazov/ Smith--DeAngelo

do you see the template?? All are mobile and can move the puck and each pair has a guy that can be really offensive and then theres McD who is all around awesome


# 1PP Shatty

#2 PP skjei/DeAngelo rotate








I still think gorts trades staal somehow. I dunno call it a gut intuition, But i just have a feeling he has something up his sleeve

I bet we deal holden+ for our new 3rd line C


and we deal nash, maybe before the season, maybe around the deadline, but he brings back a decent return....

thats all for now folks flame away

Last year's 56 was his high as far as points he's put up in a season. He's not a 60 point d-man. Fact is that was the first time he crossed the 50 point barrier in his career. He's usually in the mid 40's. So anyway you're blurring his numbers. I would expect he'd be back to mid 40's--maybe pushing 50 if the Rangers sign him. What he'll be like 7 years from now when the contract you would sign him to runs out is anybody's guess but I'm thinking there will be some decline and that at least the last couple years posters here are going to be *****ing a lot.
 
Brooks thinks its absurd for Shattenkirk to leave money on the table, that's why he's so adamant it wont happen.

Almost every big outlet has at one point said he would take less to play for the Rangers, how much less is the question?.. but he would be willing to take less.

For some players money is everything. For others, it isn't. I guess we will see with Shatty. Then again, that isn't even really a fair assumption because we may not know HOW much less the Rangers offer is. What if we offer him 5 years 30 million and NJ offers 7 years 53.5 million?
 
Larry Brooks wrote about Shattenkirk in February



http://nypost.com/2017/02/08/why-the-rangers-shouldnt-force-a-deal-at-the-trade-deadline/

The Rangers offered essentially the same deal to the Blues which Detroit accepted for Brendan Smith.

5 years/$30M.

NYC income taxes are high. NYC resident taxes for someone in that tax bracket.

It will take the Yandle contract to sign Shattenkirk. He would have to leave money and term on the table. So much money. The Yandle contract includes no state income tax in Florida.

Shattenkirk isn't worth 5 years/$30M. Forget about 7 years and $45M-$49M.

You sure love to parrot Larry Brooks.
 
Larry Brooks wrote about Shattenkirk in February



http://nypost.com/2017/02/08/why-the-rangers-shouldnt-force-a-deal-at-the-trade-deadline/

The Rangers offered essentially the same deal to the Blues which Detroit accepted for Brendan Smith.

5 years/$30M.

NYC income taxes are high. NYC resident taxes for someone in that tax bracket.

It will take the Yandle contract to sign Shattenkirk. He would have to leave money and term on the table. So much money. The Yandle contract includes no state income tax in Florida.

Shattenkirk isn't worth 5 years/$30M. Forget about 7 years and $45M-$49M.

Respectfully RB, I think it is absurd to say he isn't worth 5 years 30M. He EASILY worth that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Ad