Great ****ing post. THESE are the golden days of this franchise and I get the feeling some of the posters are spoiled little children who want to blow it all up because they have never lived through or have already forgotten the days when we used to be like Arizona, the Devils, Buffalo, Col, etc hoping and begging to make the 8th seed with the season over before the Christmas turkey is out of the ****ing oven.
Let's keep it rolling with youth and speed and not some 38 year old skating-in-sand legend ...
By the way, signing Thornton might be the worst idea I've ever heard on this board. That's saying something.
http://nypost.com/2017/06/24/what-would-rangers-give-up-for-a-top-pair-defenseman/
Brooks continues to ignore Shattenkirk.. but endorses trading for Kovalchuk and says the Rangers should look into Thornton..
This guy makes no sense.
I'm only moving McD for a center of MacKinnon's ilk. Anything else not worth it.
The problem is MacKinnon is really the only player of his ilk. All the other elite young centers have already broken out and surpassed McDonagh in value.
Off the top of my head McDavid, Draisaitl, Matthews, Eichel, Barkov, Scheifele are the elite young centers in the NHL. We aren't getting any of them for McDonagh.
MacKinnon has yet to fully break out, but it would make zero sense for a rebuilding team to trade for McDonagh right now.
The problem is MacKinnon is really the only player of his ilk. All the other elite young centers have already broken out and surpassed McDonagh in value.
Off the top of my head McDavid, Draisaitl, Matthews, Eichel, Barkov, Scheifele are the elite young centers in the NHL. We aren't getting any of them for McDonagh.
MacKinnon has yet to fully break out, but it would make zero sense for a rebuilding team to trade for McDonagh right now.
Isn't MacKinnon the oldest of all those listed???
What is he never "breaks out"
Isn't MacKinnon the oldest of all those listed???
What is he never "breaks out"
It may not be THE worst but it's up there. I said it last night when I first heard the suggestion of Thornton.
I respect and love the player he has become and he's probably a lock hall of famer. But at this point for us to pay a 37 year old slow ass center coming off not just a torn ACL but a torn MCL as well who would be commanding 4-5 million per year minimum for multiple years , I don't care if he'd be ready for camp, it would be a recipe for disaster.
Listen, I know my suggestion of Bonino isn't very sexy but he'd be effective and he wouldn't cost a fortune. Maybe when some of y'all come the realization that no one is dealing us Getzlaf or Malkin or any other top tier stud 1A center, a Bonino might not be such a horrible move afterall to those of y'all who right now can't stand the move. I'm telling you, Bonino on the Rangers would be a heck of alot more effective than having a 37 year old Joe Thornton.
we moved stepan, bought out Girardi.. minds well move McDonagh and go for the full monte
he would net a TONNN and set us up for the foreseeable future.. even if we take a step back for one year.. we should do it!!
Mackinnon available id love that
Mack and Zib 1-2 punch for years to come
There is a reason he move available than all of those as well.
I wouldn't touch Galchenyuk. I might look at Reinhart but I would want Buffalo to add.
How much $ do you think Bonino gets on the open market? I would love Bonino but someone is going to offer stupid money.
I think there is another factor here that has not been discussed. Over the next few months Crosby will turn 30, Malkin 31, and Ovi 32. It is logical to assume that their skills will soon begin to diminish; in the case of Ovi, it already might be happening. Sid is always one concussion from having his career ended prematurely.
It very well may be that the peak of the Crosby/Ovi era is right now. I know many have expressed doubts about our ability to compete with the Pens over the next few years, and they very well may be correct. But the landscape of the league may very well look different 2 or 3 years from now: the 900 lb gorilla in the room may be gone.
Whether any of the seeming rising powers in the league, Edmonton, Toronto, etc., will continue to grow is unknown.
The question is: what should our philosophy be for preparing for this new landscape? Some say to tank: but tanking is not a guarantee of success, in particular with the the way the lottery works. Plenty of teams have had endless runs of top 10 picks but are still in what seem like decades long periods of mediocrity. For those of us who have lived through long stretches of mediocrity I have this warning: as a fan it is depressing and soul-draining.
I also don't think we should be spending big money on UFAs in an attempt to remain an elite team. I don't believe any one or two players will elevate us to that level, at least in the short run.
Retooling on the fly is, for me, the best choice. it allows us to remain flexible in spending, accumulate assets, remain competitive, plan for the future, and take advantage of any situations that might come our way. The best thing about the last few days? We had a bare cupboard of prospects. Now we have 2 first round centers to watch grow and think about.
As is the case with Maximus: I am a Ranger fan of long, long standing: almost 60 years. I have seen one Cup, one of the highlights of my life, and certainly want to see more. But I am not a Cup or bust fan either. I've learned to take my happiness where it comes and these last 12 years have been just wonderful: the equal to the Francis era when I was a young fan sitting in the blueseats with a season ticket. 82 games is a long season: I want my team to be competitive, I want them to have interesting players to think about and watch. I can't define happiness with winning the Cup and the Cup only. Even though I have gone home disappointed year after year, the Rangers have enriched my life in so many ways. I'd rather retool, stay competitive (at this juncture the team looks like a bubble team to me), accumulate some assets, and prepare for a Sid-less, Ovi-less NHL (or one where they are still productive but not at the level they have been): an NHL that may be right around the corner. "Retooling on the fly" can be interesting as well as a valid philosophy. I'm in to see how it goes.
http://nypost.com/2017/06/24/what-would-rangers-give-up-for-a-top-pair-defenseman/
Brooks continues to ignore Shattenkirk.. but endorses trading for Kovalchuk and says the Rangers should look into Thornton..
This guy makes no sense.
Reinhart, Nylander/2018 first
Mackinnon
RNH & pujujarvi
These I would definitely doo.. doubt we do it tho which is a shame
Brooks is shot, rangers are signing shatty or smith if not both