Tough situation @ C, a Tavares that wants to sign cheap to stay in Toronto is hard to say no to- but it's also hard to change the identity of the team if you still have him, Matthews, and Nylander in the top 6/9.
The questions I'm asking myself are:-
- if you had a Knies-Matthews-xxx line power on power matchup line, with the xxx being a heavy, reasonably aggressive, defensively responsible winger, and Matthews leans into the "Barkov" aspects of his game to be more of a Selke type, 40/40 for 80 points grindy 1C rather than a 60/40 sniper we gameplan around enabling- can that change be beneficial come playoff time?
- if you had an xxx-Domi-Nylander sheltered offensive usage 2nd line, do you lean into the identity and get them the most offensively talented LW you can afford, or also get someone that brings a higher ratio of weight/aggression/defensive play, and can that line be effective in the playoffs?
- if your top 6 was as above- how much offense do you need from the bottom 6? Can you afford to focus on a grindy, aggressive identity and score by committee?
Depending on the answers to those questions- looking at UFA's available, knowing Berube, it's not hard to see a revamped F group with Matthews/Nylander/Knies/Domi providing the skill- everyone else selected for some combo of size/speed/aggression/work rate. A real lunch pail group. Assuming Kampf/Jarncrok/Robertson traded + Marner and Tavares gone, Bennet and Marchard re up in Florida and are off the table.
Matthews/Knies/Nylander/Domi/Laughton/McMann/Lorentz (re-signed) returning. Do you go after a Granlund/Ehlers/Boeser? Or keep that powder dry and reinvent the team with 5 of Mangiapane/ Raddysh/ Kunin/Kuraly/Appleton/Tanev/Bjugstad/Robinson/Gourde. Could a Brock Nelson fit into that kind of a heavy bottom 6, or displace Domi to the wing?