Speculation: Roster Building/Rumor Thread XVI

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Somehow I don’t see Buchevich’s agent okaying Goodrow money.
It’s painfully unlikely and would probably involve Buch just telling his agent it’s NYR or nothing.

It’s usually late career guys that take team friendly deals but Zuccarellos contract was a good 1.5 mil below the market I’d think
 
  • Like
Reactions: LaffyTaffyNYR
It’s painfully unlikely and would probably involve Buch just telling his agent it’s NYR or nothing.

It’s usually late career guys that take team friendly deals but Zuccarellos contract was a good 1.5 mil below the market I’d think

Zucc sure as hell took a Rangers discount
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fitzy
Servalli mentioned that Vegas has interest in Strome, too bad they probably wont trade Stephenson that would be a hell of a contract to add and probably allow the Rangers to easily keep Buchnevich (but then Krav would be on the 3rd line)
 
If Buch were on another team, there would be trade proposals for him and his contract extension so he could shelter the younger RWs.
 
If Buch were on another team, there would be trade proposals for him and his contract extension so he could shelter the younger RWs.
No there wouldn’t. Because we would still have Kakko and Kravtsov. We would still have Gauthier and even Kreider as an option for RW if really need be. And we would still have a need for a prominent 2C/1B C
 
We’ve been over this.

But what does your disagreement with adding Tarasenko have anything at all to do with paying Goodrow twice his value?

You were bagging on Drury for making an "inexplicable move" yet you were pining for a player who would have been even more inexplicable.

We're loaded on RW, lets bring in another one who doesn't fit! Goodrow's contract is bad, but at least he fits.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nyr2k2
You were bagging on Drury for making an "inexplicable move" yet you were pining for a player who would have been even more inexplicable.

We're loaded on RW, lets bring in another one who doesn't fit! Goodrow's contract is bad, but at least he fits.
Ah, so you’re hoping to distract instead of addressing the actual point.

That makes sense, because that Goodrow deal is horrible. I wouldn’t want to defend that either.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad