Reality Czech
Registered User
- Apr 17, 2017
- 5,825
- 9,413
not with binnington they're not.
Yeah everyone knows you could never win a Cup with Binnington in net, sheesh.
not with binnington they're not.
maybe they could get matt murray instead.Yeah everyone knows you could never win a Cup with Binnington in net, sheesh.
I don’t know this person named “everyone”. If you’re assuming that I am somehow panicking you’re making the wrong assumption. I’m not responsible for the Blues success or lack there of.
This is the trade forum with mostly “what if” scenarios.
Why wasn't your "What if scenario" posted here when they started the year 3-0 then?
Probably coincidence.
IF the Blues are somehow bottom feeders this year, they may try to trade Tank but O'Reilly stays. I'm guessing Tank isn't a Blue and ROR is a Blue next year regardless of what happens this season, successful season or miss the playoffs.
Thank you for your service.Dont worry St louis fans! I, a leafs fan, will settle this civil war and unite you once more.
Holl, Muzzin and a second for Parayko.
You're welcome.
Maybe you will want to check my post history. You’ll see where I said I wasn’t optimistic for this season and I was trying to be objective. Of course the same Blues fans who are gold medal winners at assuming things said remarks like “it must suck to be so negative all the time”.
But like you said, me being objective is probably just a coincidence right??
Blues losing 5-1 at home vs LA… probably another coincidence
Lol lucic nobody is taking lucicIf you're Calgary trading for Tarasenko, the goal is to improve the team, not add a winger at the expense of a Dman
Lucic + picks/prospects seems more in line with that objective
Lol lu
Lol lucic nobody is taking lucic
I couldn't care less what you said about the Blues before the season began or for that matter, that the Blues lost a random regular season game Vs the Kings. This season is what...10% through, if that? Now you are attempting to use the Blues rough start to the season to confirm your prediction that you evidently made before the season began about the Blues being subpar this season and as justification for the Blues potentially blowing up their roster by trading 2 of their best players only after the rough start you wanted them to have happened but shockingly, not when they were undefeated. That would be like me knowing you made a prediction that the Blues were going to suck this season and me bragging to you how wrong you were after their 3-0 start. Terrible.
The point is that the Blues could very well end up having a bad season but it's far too early to make that determination, far too early to seriously discuss blowing up the roster and certainly far too early to claim your prediction was ultimately accurate. Let's see how things go the next couple of months so we can go off of a sample size larger than 8 whole games before posting trade proposals involving players that are less likely to be traded at this stage of the season than me winning the lottery.
You can obviously type a lot but you can’t read worth a flying f***.
Go back & read my 1st post in this thread. Then read it again. Then go back and read it again. When you can figure out that I said "if the Blues are out of a playoff picture at the TDL" come back and post another paragraph telling me how much you finally figured it all out. My post isn't about trading anyone right now or after 8 games as once again you assume.
Holy donkey balls.......
Considering how trash the Central division is, I doubt they'd be out of the running until the last week of the season.
May not be necessary. Cap space is pro rated. Calgary went into the season with $1.5 million in cap space. That translates into over $6 million in deadline cap space, plus Calgary will have some more space from the IR.Lucic is being paid just 1 million in actual dollars this season
Any team that is a seller at the deadline and wants to move a high-priced player knows they'll be taking back Lucic in a trade with Calgary
Depends on who you ask. "Contenders" in the sense that before the season you could reasonably make an argument they were the 3rd/4th best team in what looked like a weak West? Sure. Contenders in the sense that they actually had the pieces to go all the way? Well, your mileage may vary on that one. Tarasenko and ROR are both UFAs and the team is already saddled with a huge amount of money going to veterans. They look outright awful currently, riding a 6 game losing streak that's barreling towards 7 given their next game is on the road against the Bruins. It's early, yes, but you can only bake-in so many 5+ game pointless streaks (which is very difficult to do in today's in NHL!) while looking largely non-competitive. I still think we are a while away from Armstrong punting on the season, but it may be the right call sooner rather than later.Uhh...aren't STL Stanley Cup contenders?
At the end of the day it’s gotta be Tank or Kane. If either of those guys hit the market the Isles should be all over it.If NYI are in good position, I think they'd be extremely interested in Tarasenko. He fits NYI's needs and play style. I would think NYI making that move would mean they are going all in on this year, because one imagines it would cost them Wahlstrom in return.
If you're Calgary trading for Tarasenko, the goal is to improve the team, not add a winger at the expense of a Dman
Lucic + picks/prospects seems more in line with that objective