No Dress Rehearsal
Have a couple kleenex boxes maybe a beach towel for episode 4. 10/10
Also
Long Time Running
10/10
Have a couple kleenex boxes maybe a beach towel for episode 4. 10/10
Also
Long Time Running
10/10
Review Your Fave/Recent Documentaries
- Thread starter kook10
- Start date
The Fire Next Door (1977)
A news special that covered the arson spree hitting the Bronx in the mid 70s. Interesting time capsule now, that foreshadowed a lot of what did & would happen to a lot of American (inner) cities.. following White flight and epidemic drug use.
I watched it on YouTube.
A news special that covered the arson spree hitting the Bronx in the mid 70s. Interesting time capsule now, that foreshadowed a lot of what did & would happen to a lot of American (inner) cities.. following White flight and epidemic drug use.
I watched it on YouTube.
This is the Zodiac Speaking (2024)
3-part Netflix series.. that gathered recollections of a family, who became convinced an old family friend was the Zodiac killer.
It's a pretty compelling case, and the suspect they name was actually a primary suspect.
My main complaint is that the doc doesn't offer much pushback on the family's theory. Even if the film-makers wholeheartedly support the accusation.. for credibility & balance I wanted to hear more context of why he was never charged, flaws in the theory etc..
3-part Netflix series.. that gathered recollections of a family, who became convinced an old family friend was the Zodiac killer.
It's a pretty compelling case, and the suspect they name was actually a primary suspect.
My main complaint is that the doc doesn't offer much pushback on the family's theory. Even if the film-makers wholeheartedly support the accusation.. for credibility & balance I wanted to hear more context of why he was never charged, flaws in the theory etc..
Unholy Diver
Registered User
Was there any new info or thoughts uncovered in this one? It seems like the Zodiac has been covered to death over the last 10-15 years or so, and it's been the same handful of suspects rehashed and reshuffled
archangel2
Registered User
- May 19, 2019
- 2,870
- 1,773
I watched 3 Docs on The Battle of Jutland. But from different times and eras.
en.wikipedia.org
It was an interesting seeing how the views changed over the years as to just how crazy the battle was. Brits had the biggest and baddest ships calls Dreadnoughts had the latest techs, armaments and all the bells and whistles. There was one flaw to the the ships. The Guys in charge Beatty and Jellicoe, while very suitable to the job they had, they were old schools admiral and had no idea how to use the technology they had.
Battle of Jutland - Wikipedia
It was an interesting seeing how the views changed over the years as to just how crazy the battle was. Brits had the biggest and baddest ships calls Dreadnoughts had the latest techs, armaments and all the bells and whistles. There was one flaw to the the ships. The Guys in charge Beatty and Jellicoe, while very suitable to the job they had, they were old schools admiral and had no idea how to use the technology they had.
No new suspect.. actually a very old suspect (Allen). But his guilt was looked at from a newer angle.. a family Allen had befriended during the years of the killings.
And basically out of respect for their mother's affection for Allen, the grown kids didn't fully, publicly name Allen as the Zodiac until after her death.
It's a very compelling testimony because 3 of the children, now seniors, came to believe Allen was the Zodiac. But the doc omits all other suspects, who also have compelling, circumstantial potential.
Jumptheshark
Rebooting myself
Watch an interesting doc on D-Day. Was not about what happened on that day but the lead up to and all the logistics and other stuff. Great Doc but I have my usual moan. Because it was done by a US company. They put all the allies into one category and used the British flag. So that means when they talked about Juno beach? The call the Canadian troops British.
Jumptheshark
Rebooting myself
Saw couple doc on Jack the ripper, where each one suggested they "closed" the case on different suspects. Each one started from the perspective their guy was Jack. The funniest was the one where it stuck to Aaron Kosminsk and because of DNA from the shawl that belonged to Catherine Eddowes. It comes from the book Naming Jack the Ripper publish 2014. The book got ripped to shreds when it came out and the flaws in how the author came to the conclusion is still being ripped to shreds and he refuses to release the methodology used on the shawl and the scientist who did the test--finally admitted how he tested the shawl was pre determined by the guy who writing the book . The one thing that came out in one of the docs was that the shawl was washed "several times" over the years and that due to that it would not be able to used for proper DNA test
Jumptheshark
Rebooting myself
Spent 3 hours watching a doc on Lord Lucan. He was a Lord who killed a Nanny then vanished. The was made by the son of the nanny. It is an interesting video but asks you to suspend all logic and sense too many times. The son does come off as a nut job with his single narrow vision of what he wants to believe
(Impact X Nightline) What Happened to Karen Silkwood? (2024)
New Nightline doc that was recently released on Hulu. It reexamines the death of workplace whistleblower Karen Silkwood, and her fatal car crash from 1974. Kind of an intriguing case, and good primer if you've never heard of Silkwood, or seen her bio movie..
New Nightline doc that was recently released on Hulu. It reexamines the death of workplace whistleblower Karen Silkwood, and her fatal car crash from 1974. Kind of an intriguing case, and good primer if you've never heard of Silkwood, or seen her bio movie..
Untold Johnny Football (2024)
Netflix doc on the rapid rise & fall of Johnny Manziel. Nothing really new.. and to be honest, not much insights. Just a pretty straightforward chronology of Manziel's couple of years in the football limelight.
And listening to Manziel recollect the experience, he seems like a decent man.. who just wasn't comfortable with all the attention & responsibility of being Johnny Football. The story doesn't seem to be any deeper or darker than that.. even tho the media presented it as a complex, moralistic tragedy at the time.
Netflix doc on the rapid rise & fall of Johnny Manziel. Nothing really new.. and to be honest, not much insights. Just a pretty straightforward chronology of Manziel's couple of years in the football limelight.
And listening to Manziel recollect the experience, he seems like a decent man.. who just wasn't comfortable with all the attention & responsibility of being Johnny Football. The story doesn't seem to be any deeper or darker than that.. even tho the media presented it as a complex, moralistic tragedy at the time.
Jumptheshark
Rebooting myself
Two competing Docs on Mark Felt who of course was Deep Throat.
Both were told from different perspectives. One portrayed Felt as a patriot who could not stand by why the white house trampled on everything the was right and proper.
The second I think it was more accurate. What started Felt down the path he went on was when J Edger Hover died and not only was Felt Bi-passed for the top job, he got knocked down a few pegs. One other former FBI agent also is mentioned a lot in the doc was Bill Sullivan. He was the FBI's dirty tricks operational guy. Both him and Felt were behind a lot of the illegal wire taps and all the really nasty stuff the FBI did in the 1960's. Sullivan is the agent who sent MLK's wife the photos of him cheating on her with other women. Sulliven was recruited by Nixon after the FBI got rid of him. Felt is portrayed not as a patriot but more as a man pissed off at being passed over the top job. With Hoover dead, Nixon made a move to put the FBI under his thumb and this actually helped to Nixon downfall. The guy who Nixon wanted as the new FBI head did not survive the confirmation hearings and actually help serve up Nixon and a others up. While Felt was tipping off the Post, Pat Grey (who was the acting director) admitted under oath at his confirmation hearings that he gave around 100 reports/files about the Watergate breaking in and destroyed around 20 reports that put the Whitehouse in trouble. He was asked why he did it? "I was ordered to" was his response. When asked by whom? "The President". That is when both houses went against the White House and more interference came out about what orders Nixon gave. While the second doc does not down play Felt and what he did with the Washington Post. He sheds light on the other stuff that was going within the FBI and both house. Grey's testimony was a massive nail in Nixon coffin.
Both were told from different perspectives. One portrayed Felt as a patriot who could not stand by why the white house trampled on everything the was right and proper.
The second I think it was more accurate. What started Felt down the path he went on was when J Edger Hover died and not only was Felt Bi-passed for the top job, he got knocked down a few pegs. One other former FBI agent also is mentioned a lot in the doc was Bill Sullivan. He was the FBI's dirty tricks operational guy. Both him and Felt were behind a lot of the illegal wire taps and all the really nasty stuff the FBI did in the 1960's. Sullivan is the agent who sent MLK's wife the photos of him cheating on her with other women. Sulliven was recruited by Nixon after the FBI got rid of him. Felt is portrayed not as a patriot but more as a man pissed off at being passed over the top job. With Hoover dead, Nixon made a move to put the FBI under his thumb and this actually helped to Nixon downfall. The guy who Nixon wanted as the new FBI head did not survive the confirmation hearings and actually help serve up Nixon and a others up. While Felt was tipping off the Post, Pat Grey (who was the acting director) admitted under oath at his confirmation hearings that he gave around 100 reports/files about the Watergate breaking in and destroyed around 20 reports that put the Whitehouse in trouble. He was asked why he did it? "I was ordered to" was his response. When asked by whom? "The President". That is when both houses went against the White House and more interference came out about what orders Nixon gave. While the second doc does not down play Felt and what he did with the Washington Post. He sheds light on the other stuff that was going within the FBI and both house. Grey's testimony was a massive nail in Nixon coffin.
RandV
It's a wolf v2.0
Came out a month ago but just saw it on Disney and in the middle of it, National Geopgraphic has a new documentary out on the Endurance. Mixes a retelling of Shackleton's story using colour enhancement on the real footage and following a team in 2022 (I think) in the antarctic trying to locate the wreck.
I don't know yet if they go right to the end of Shackelton's story as part of the focus is on the sunk Endurance but if anyone's never heard of theses names then this is a must watch, and still really good regardless.
I don't know yet if they go right to the end of Shackelton's story as part of the focus is on the sunk Endurance but if anyone's never heard of theses names then this is a must watch, and still really good regardless.
