nuck
Schrodingers Cat
- Aug 18, 2005
- 11,650
- 2,687
I am not going to start a "should we keep AM" thread because I believe the team should make every effort to retain their #1C. But we have to be honest that there is at least some chance they won't meet his ask and they would have to shop him. Some people have posted to trade him to Chicago for Bedard which is interesting but I am absolutely certain the Hawks would not do that. However the next few teams on the list are not looking at getting that generational talent level next year so it could become a Fantilli, or Michkov or Carlsson deal.
I don't think the Leafs would wait for Michkov so its more Fantilli or Carlsson. The one reason why this could work would be the freed up cap would allow them to resign a player like ROR, buy out Murray and help afford Mitch and Willie too. The downside is obvious but there would need to be more coming back. I think Anaheim or SJS would be interested although the Sharks would be more cap constrained because they chose not to move Karlsson. Does this make sense with where the Leafs are today or do you think any deal has to be built around the right player under contract coming back?
I don't think the Leafs would wait for Michkov so its more Fantilli or Carlsson. The one reason why this could work would be the freed up cap would allow them to resign a player like ROR, buy out Murray and help afford Mitch and Willie too. The downside is obvious but there would need to be more coming back. I think Anaheim or SJS would be interested although the Sharks would be more cap constrained because they chose not to move Karlsson. Does this make sense with where the Leafs are today or do you think any deal has to be built around the right player under contract coming back?