This is what you wrote
..."now.....and that is if gallant is only here for two years and that is what he will instill in this young roster is something that will not hurt us moving forward as all you need to do is look at the success of the Knights while he was there and after and look how Huberdeau/Barkov/and the other kids have turned out...SOLID NHL stars . Gerard Gallant will not hurt us"
Now, you're saying you didn't say Gallant played a major role in the success of Barkov and Huberdeau?
You can't advocate both sides of the same argument.
Yes or no?
Did Gallant play a major role in the development of Barkov and Huberdeau?
If no, then your original statement makes no sense.
If yes, can we similarly conclude that Quinn played a major role in Fox's development?
BTW, thanks for your forgiveness.