For Seider, I do think both Weber and Pronger are pretty good stylistic comparisons. Will he be as good as Weber, nevermind Pronger? Who knows, obviously those two are/were unreal dmen, it’s very far from a lock, but Seider has nuts potential, it’s possible.
For Edvinsson, agreed that I don’t really see Suter as the best comparable. Main similarity is that puck moving is a strength for both, but otherwise they’re pretty different. Edvinsson is much taller, his skating is more exceptional for his size, and he’s potentially a more dynamic puck carrier. However Suter was more cerebral, higher hockey IQ, much more of a rock solid “makes the right play every time” type. That’s Suter’s main strength - if you’re comparing someone to Suter, they should have standout hockey IQ, but not standout physical abilities - while Edvinsson is more about standout physical abilities than hockey IQ. For upside, I’d compare him more to … Parayko maybe? Or a bigger OEL, who’s better defensively but with a worse shot?
For Edvinsson, agreed that I don’t really see Suter as the best comparable. Main similarity is that puck moving is a strength for both, but otherwise they’re pretty different. Edvinsson is much taller, his skating is more exceptional for his size, and he’s potentially a more dynamic puck carrier. However Suter was more cerebral, higher hockey IQ, much more of a rock solid “makes the right play every time” type. That’s Suter’s main strength - if you’re comparing someone to Suter, they should have standout hockey IQ, but not standout physical abilities - while Edvinsson is more about standout physical abilities than hockey IQ. For upside, I’d compare him more to … Parayko maybe? Or a bigger OEL, who’s better defensively but with a worse shot?
Last edited: