RD Carter Yakemchuk - Calgary Hitmen, WHL (2024, 7th, OTT)

majormajor

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
26,808
33,017
Having said that, for such a passionate and brilliant high iQ player - Mark Stone, who is 6'3" with uncanny timing and the ability to get to the right spot - he is remarkably not physical. He could be 5'5" and it would make no difference at all in his game tbh. Maybe less solid on his stick, but more agile and light on his skates?

Yamerchuk is physical though, and in no way shy about contact. His size and strength is an asset. And he will be vvery hard to play against so long as he stays motivated.

Height is largely about reach, we don't talk about that enough. Whether you're willing to throw the body or not, you still have a huge advantage with a long reach. And Stone absolutely relies on it, his anticipation isn't going to get him the puck if it's a foot out of reach.
 

Skinnyjimmy08

WorldTraveler
Mar 30, 2012
22,929
12,778
I love how happy everyone is now with him and how sour I’m sure rival fans are with how good he has been when a few months ago many Sens fans were pissed off and rival fans were laughing when he was drafted.

Us posters that see WHL a lot knew how good of a player he was but many people just get caught up with all the random mock drafts online and feel at the time it was a reach taking him that high
 

Samsquanch

Raging Bull Squatch
Nov 28, 2008
8,274
5,089
Sudbury
Height is largely about reach, we don't talk about that enough. Whether you're willing to throw the body or not, you still have a huge advantage with a long reach. And Stone absolutely relies on it, his anticipation isn't going to get him the puck if it's a foot out of reach.

I would agree but also add that being quicker (ie lighter) and faster on your feet, and all over the ice for that matter, would negate the reach factor overall if you are a supreme high IQ player.

Point being though is that Yamerchuck is a stronger man physically and more willing to engage than Stone ever was. Already. Not that they have a choppy stride, or have a short reach.
 
Last edited:

CanadienShark

Registered User
Dec 18, 2012
40,110
14,830
I love how happy everyone is now with him and how sour I’m sure rival fans are with how good he has been when a few months ago many Sens fans were pissed off and rival fans were laughing when he was drafted.

Us posters that see WHL a lot knew how good of a player he was but many people just get caught up with all the random mock drafts online and feel at the time it was a reach taking him that high
I felt he went a little high at the time. I had personally preferred Buium and Dickinson at #11 (assuming all 3 were available), but Yakemchuk is showing he was drafted at the right spot. He's got a lot of talent and has been really impressive.
 

hotcabbagesoup

"I'm going to get what I deserve" -RutgerMcgroarty
Feb 18, 2009
10,993
15,305
Reno, Nevada
He is really good with the puck, not flashy but those passes he makes are so good and easy to catch. Great placement, speed, everything feels so crisp. It's weird seeing it from a guy who's so big. Like watching a Thornton but on D.
 

Nac Mac Feegle

wee & free
Jun 10, 2011
35,548
9,943
Crazy because I was literally going to compare him to Mark Stone (were both Sens fans so Im not going to lose my hat, but wow). They just get to the right place and let the hands take over.

Having said that, for such a passionate and brilliant high iQ player - Mark Stone, who is 6'3" with uncanny timing and the ability to get to the right spot - he is remarkably not physical. He could be 5'5" and it would make no difference at all in his game tbh. Maybe less solid on his stick, but more agile and light on his skates?

Yamerchuk is physical though, and in no way shy about contact. His size and strength is an asset. And he will be vvery hard to play against so long as he stays motivated.

He definitely has a good dose of that Mark Stone level vision......which is scary, considering Stone is practically jedi-like in that regard.

I do worry about Yak's strength though. Being a defenseman and taking hits against men is hard even when you're fit. As a teenager is going to be doubly difficult. The team really has to take care regarding matchups and icetime, and continue to put him in a position to succeed.

He's had a jaw-dropping preseason, but he's still a kid, and in a kid's body. We can't forget that.
 

KapG

Registered User
Dec 2, 2008
10,699
1,881
Toronto
So has he played his way onto the team? Might be a smart move. Is he really going to learn how to defend against grown men playing against a bunch of teenagers in the CHL after all?

I hated the Tkachuk pick, I hated the Sanderson pick, I was disappointed Stützle fell to us instead of Byfield and I was mad with the Yakemchuk pick.

I liked the Boucher pick.
To be fair wrt Byfield he has taken longer to develop but he had some bad luck early in his pro career. He seems to be right on track now. Big season incoming for him.
 

Boonk

Registered User
Oct 10, 2017
2,947
3,998
He is a rover out there and deserves the 9 games. Ottawa has their future top pair RD right here. He needs to get stronger, faster and learn how to defend better at the NHL (more news at 11 duh lol) and we'll see how it actually translates in the regular season vs preseason.

The fact that hes able to keep up and produce like this in the late preseason is a good sign tho. He will have the support of Sanderson, Chabot and Zub which has the makings of a decent top 4, and (hopefully) decent goaltending Ottawa hasnt had in a long time.
 

Joeyjoejoe

Registered User
Dec 18, 2015
6,513
9,469
The things he needs to work on can just be obtained through coaching, experience and general maturity.

The things he’s elite at which are offensive IQ, hands and shot are all natural to him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: guyzeur

Bronz

Registered User
Oct 21, 2013
96
27
This guy just looks like a natural on offence. If the Sens don't keep him, they won't ice their best team. Out of every rookie in the pre-season, Michkov included, Yakemchuk is the one that has screamed 'Superstar upside' the most.
 

Pavel Buchnevich

"Pavel Buchnevich The Fake"
Dec 8, 2013
60,246
27,009
New York
Hate to be that person, but is anyone thinking he might not be an instant NHL star?

The NHL is tough for a D+1. The preseason is filled with a bunch of AHL’ers and worse. I don’t want to dismiss what he’s done. Of course, it’s very noteworthy, but will he get the time and situations in Ottawa this season and will he perform the same way on both sides of the puck when the games matter?

We’ve seen so many stories over the years of a very good prospect that knocks the door down during preseason, the regular season starts, and things don’t go their way before they get benched, scratched, and demoted. You hope, for Ottawa’s sake, that he can continue this, but it’ll be tough.
 

SensontheRush

Never said it was Sunshine
Apr 27, 2010
5,023
2,978
Ottawa
Hate to be that person, but is anyone thinking he might not be an instant NHL star?

The NHL is tough for a D+1. The preseason is filled with a bunch of AHL’ers and worse. I don’t want to dismiss what he’s done. Of course, it’s very noteworthy, but will he get the time and situations in Ottawa this season and will he perform the same way on both sides of the puck when the games matter?

We’ve seen so many stories over the years of a very good prospect that knocks the door down during preseason, the regular season starts, and things don’t go their way before they get benched, scratched, and demoted. You hope, for Ottawa’s sake, that he can continue this, but it’ll be tough.
I don't really think anyone is banking on him being an "instant superstar" stepping into the league. That would be kind of ridiculous IMO; however, he definitely is flashing the type of game of a clearcut star in the making.

He's at a Top 6D level right now; I don't think anyone wants to trust him with heavier deployment/harder matchups than that on the onset.
 

Boxscore

Registered User
Sponsor
Jan 22, 2007
14,692
7,814
This guy just looks like a natural on offence. If the Sens don't keep him, they won't ice their best team. Out of every rookie in the pre-season, Michkov included, Yakemchuk is the one that has screamed 'Superstar upside' the most.
Him, Michkov, and Gauthier have all shown glimpses of being future superstars. I'd say Michkov slightly more so but Yak has been absolutely incredible.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fatass

majormajor

Registered User
Jun 23, 2018
26,808
33,017
Him, Michkov, and Gauthier have all shown glimpses of being future superstars. I'd say Michkov slightly more so but Yak has been absolutely incredible.

I could see future superstar in both Michkov and Yak. In this pre-season I found Yak to be more consistently showing those glimpses, but obviously with Michkov's pedigree I can understand giving him a lean. Gauthier I saw the highlights of him finishing off two goals set up by Leo. I could see him doing that a lot. But superstar? Was there something I missed?
 

Masked

(Super/star)
Apr 16, 2017
6,845
5,102
They got the donuts? Excellent....
Hate to be that person, but is anyone thinking he might not be an instant NHL star?

That's literally what everyone is thinking.

But they're also thinking that he looks WAY more ready than what was expected when he was drafted. He was thought to be a guy on a long development path. That path is looking a lot shorter with his preseason.

No one expected him to compete for that roster spot this season. But he's done that with his play this preseason.
 

Waterbuf

Registered User
Sep 21, 2018
944
1,198
Vancouver
Hate to be that person, but is anyone thinking he might not be an instant NHL star?

The NHL is tough for a D+1. The preseason is filled with a bunch of AHL’ers and worse. I don’t want to dismiss what he’s done. Of course, it’s very noteworthy, but will he get the time and situations in Ottawa this season and will he perform the same way on both sides of the puck when the games matter?

We’ve seen so many stories over the years of a very good prospect that knocks the door down during preseason, the regular season starts, and things don’t go their way before they get benched, scratched, and demoted. You hope, for Ottawa’s sake, that he can continue this, but it’ll be tough.
Is anyone thinking he might be an instant NHL star?
 

Fatass

Registered User
Apr 17, 2017
24,091
15,812
Is anyone thinking he might be an instant NHL star?
He’s like a bigger Makar. He will make the Sens out of camp and be a key piece in their making the playoffs. He’s a difference maker.
 

Golden_Jet

Registered User
Sep 21, 2005
26,571
13,804
Hate to be that person, but is anyone thinking he might not be an instant NHL star?

The NHL is tough for a D+1. The preseason is filled with a bunch of AHL’ers and worse. I don’t want to dismiss what he’s done. Of course, it’s very noteworthy, but will he get the time and situations in Ottawa this season and will he perform the same way on both sides of the puck when the games matter?

We’ve seen so many stories over the years of a very good prospect that knocks the door down during preseason, the regular season starts, and things don’t go their way before they get benched, scratched, and demoted. You hope, for Ottawa’s sake, that he can continue this, but it’ll be tough.
I don’t think I’ve seen anyone thinks he could be an instant star, just seeing deserves some games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nac Mac Feegle

Boxscore

Registered User
Sponsor
Jan 22, 2007
14,692
7,814
That's literally what everyone is thinking.

But they're also thinking that he looks WAY more ready than what was expected when he was drafted. He was thought to be a guy on a long development path. That path is looking a lot shorter with his preseason.

No one expected him to compete for that roster spot this season. But he's done that with his play this preseason.
Yak is giving me the young Dion Phaneuf vibes (in a good way). Gets drafted behind a couple of other defensemen then explodes onto the scene with awesome offense, flair, and eye-popping highlights.
 

wetcoast

Registered User
Nov 20, 2018
24,900
11,724
I don’t think I’ve seen anyone thinks he could be an instant star, just seeing deserves some games.
To be fair there are 3 posts on this page indicating otherwise before that poster poster and then a couple since then.

The kid looks like the best player on the ice for both clubs most nights.

The things he needs to work on can just be obtained through coaching, experience and general maturity.

The things he’s elite at which are offensive IQ, hands and shot are all natural to him.

This guy just looks like a natural on offence. If the Sens don't keep him, they won't ice their best team. Out of every rookie in the pre-season, Michkov included, Yakemchuk is the one that has screamed 'Superstar upside' the most.

Him, Michkov, and Gauthier have all shown glimpses of being future superstars. I'd say Michkov slightly more so but Yak has been absolutely incredible.

I could see future superstar in both Michkov and Yak. In this pre-season I found Yak to be more consistently showing those glimpses, but obviously with Michkov's pedigree I can understand giving him a lean. Gauthier I saw the highlights of him finishing off two goals set up by Leo. I could see him doing that a lot. But superstar? Was there something I missed?

He’s like a bigger Makar. He will make the Sens out of camp and be a key piece in their making the playoffs. He’s a difference maker.


I get that he has looked impressive this preseason but it's preseason right?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad