They should really have a camp and some competition but whatever, if Canada wins it's no big deal but if they don't.........Sens fans will be all over it no doubt.Leaving him off the team is one thing but not even inviting him to camp is a really strange decision. Sad for him because it was his last chance to play at the world Juniors.
It’s insane this kid isn’t on team Canada. He’d be the clubs best D man. And it’s not even close.They should really have a camp and some competition but whatever, if Canada wins it's no big deal but if they don't.........Sens fans will be all over it no doubt.
It’s insane this kid isn’t on team Canada.
What club?He’d be the clubs best D man. And it’s not even close.
Agreed. Yak would be the best player (not just D) on the Canadian WJC team. Canada has so many good players they can win any tournament regardless, but that doesn’t deny the fact Yak is better than the guys picked.What club?
Oh you mean the Canada entry at the WJC and that's debatba;e to say the least as they are building a team there for a tournament not which guy had the NHL preseason.
If you say so.Agreed. Yak would be the best player (not just D) on the Canadian WJC team. Canada has so many good players they can win any tournament regardless, but that doesn’t deny the fact Yak is better than the guys picked.
Again the Canadian team is always so deep with talent they can make egregious mistakes. Yak will be a better nhl player than any player on this iteration of team WJC Canada.If you say so.
I don't agree or even really know (as you probably don't either) but Team Canada doesn't think so and I say this as someone who thinks they should have had a camp at least.
That's pretty bold in that 3 other Dmen could be better in the NHL in Parekh, Dickinson or the best best IMO Matthew Schaefer.Again the Canadian team is always so deep with talent they can make egregious mistakes. Yak will be a better nhl player than any player on this iteration of team WJC Canada.
Imo Yak is a bigger version of Makar. So I think I’ll mark your post and keep it to repost in two years.That's pretty bold in that 3 other Dmen could be better in the NHL in Parekh, Dickinson or the best best IMO Matthew Schaefer.
My guess is that your post isn't going to age well.
Schaefer will likely be awesome . But I agree he should’ve got an invite . But maybe they prefer this mix of skillsThat's pretty bold in that 3 other Dmen could be better in the NHL in Parekh, Dickinson or the best best IMO Matthew Schaefer.
My guess is that your post isn't going to age well.
I don't disagree he should have received an invite but that other poster just called him a bigger version of Makar FFS.Schaefer will likely be awesome . But I agree he should’ve got an invite . But maybe they prefer this mix of skills
To be fair Makar didn’t play a huge role on the wjc squad ( unless I’m mistaken ) so maybe he’ll be ok. But of course that call is bold / earlyI don't disagree he should have received an invite but that other poster just called him a bigger version of Makar FFS.
A bigger version of Makar is... a bold statement considering the only thing that holds back Makar from being even better is his size.Imo Yak is a bigger version of Makar. So I think I’ll mark your post and keep it to repost in two years.
Yak will be a special player. Canada is stupid not having him. But Canada is so deep in talent (so much deeper than all the other countries combined) they can make these choices and still dominate the tournament.,A bigger version of Makar is... a bold statement considering the only thing that holds back Makar from being even better is his size.
So you think Yak is a generational and is going to be one of the best defenseman that has ever played the game?
To be fair Makar didn’t play a huge role on the wjc squad ( unless I’m mistaken ) so maybe he’ll be ok. But of course that call is bold / early
Seems like they went with Dickinson/Molendyk as the top 2 offensive/2 way options, which was the likely outcome from the start. Dickinson's season thus far, and his PP dominence, likely led to them thinking that they were set on offense with those 2, and then Schaefer as the 3rd option took the wind out of the sails of Parekh and Yak.Canada very old school. 2 scoring lines. Checking/PK line. 4th line is energy over more offensive guys. Heard they left both Iginla and Sennecke off as well since neither PKs really.
But, should Canada be down in the 3rd of a key game, might want to have that extra offensive player or two. Guess that also means that the top 6 F don't really PK.
Are 2nd and 3rd rounders like Akey, Mynio, Gibson, and Price better than Yakemchuk and Parekh? NHL scouts and GM's don't seem to think so. There should be a big difference in talent between a top 10 pick and a mid rounder.
Appreciate the info. I only watch a very small bit of CHL, so i don't really know. Just seems odd to me that TC takes the less talented person. I know that there are certain types of skills, but there is something to be said for taking the best guys and molding your team around them, rather than having a fixed idea of what your team should be. Especially when we are talking younger, non pros.Better prospects? Definitelty not, not close
Better suited for whatever role they have in mind (Gibson as a defensive D for example)? Possibly. Both Parekh and Yakemchuk struggle defensively, like Pronman said a day or two ago, management were likely worried about their defensive play
Allen and Akey are questionable without a doubt, I think it's a very, very suspect that either was invited, but neither would be used as an offensive, PP D, which is all that Parekh and Yak would be on the team.
Akey and Allen weren't invited to the summer showcase, whereas both Yak and Parekh were. HC management seemingly liked what they've seen in the OHL more than they have Yak and Parekh in the summer showcase, WHL and OHL this year for the roles they are looking to fill.
Pretty wild to me that both of those guys are there, but is what it is, niether is going to be on the team
They definitely wouldn't.Appreciate the info. I only watch a very small bit of CHL, so i don't really know. Just seems odd to me that TC takes the less talented person. I know that there are certain types of skills, but there is something to be said for taking the best guys and molding your team around them, rather than having a fixed idea of what your team should be. Especially when we are talking younger, non pros.
I mean, would CAL trade Parekh for Akey? Ott Yak for Price?
Right I just meant he often would get bottom pairing minutes / offensive centric zone starts . Treating him as a specialist ( in this tournament only ) is a better description than I provided .Yes and no. He had a massive impact on the team for sure and ended up on the WJC all-star team, but Ducharme handled him like he was a specialist most of the time.
No. NHL scouts and GM didn't think those guys will be better against men in 2 to 5 years. They haven't opined on whether they will be better against juniors in a month.Are 2nd and 3rd rounders like Akey, Mynio, Gibson, and Price better than Yakemchuk and Parekh? NHL scouts and GM's don't seem to think so. There should be a big difference in talent between a top 10 pick and a mid rounder.