Mrfenn92
Proud to be American
All coming up smallExcellent job with your dick-measuring contest, guys.
All coming up smallExcellent job with your dick-measuring contest, guys.
Anyways, as a Hawk fan dude was not my first choice and the IQ thing was just the same as what I saw. His blunders, oof. Watched a good bit of him in the NCAA and I'm not sure I've seen a guy get away with more epic goofs but they rarely landed him a -. Figured it was mostly luck. Couldn't deny the good parts though.
In the AHL I expected a rough first year, but he was definitely less mistake prone after a short while and in no time extremely confident all over. When he was called up I expected a certain amount of said goofs as well, even less in the big league? Hoping he continues this trajectory, the guy can be all over the ice at incredible angles in one or two strides, that cheat code gives him a huge presence to unexpectedly step up anywhere in all 3 zones which he does when he's at his best.
Fingers crossed.
He's been in a number of leagues over the last few years, and it was a common occurrence that he would start slow in each league and end the season good enough that he'd get bumped up to a tougher league the season after.Was this progress something that the Hawks scouting team expected to happen?
They had to be seeing the same screwups we all saw in the NCAA. I'm wondering how they viewed it.
Again, this narrative that Levshunov was some big dumb lug that made constant bonehead plays, that appeared to catch fire on here with that one guy aggressively clip-hunting errors (in games I watched and felt he played very well) and Twitter doesn't seem to be grounded with what I'd call the "general scouting consensus". He was named the best defenseman in a strong hockey conference, the Big Ten, as a draft eligible and looked every bit the MVP on a Top 5 team in the country. Levshunov was viewed as an all-around DMan with a high ceiling and safe floor, with the added bonus of being an RHD, and that's why he went Number 2 in the draft, and had he not gone Number 2, probably goes Number 3.Was this progress something that the Hawks scouting team expected to happen?
They had to be seeing the same screwups we all saw in the NCAA. I'm wondering how they viewed it.
Again, this narrative that Levshunov was some big dumb lug that made constant bonehead plays, that appeared to catch fire on here with that one guy aggressively clip-hunting errors (in games I watched and felt he played very well) and Twitter doesn't seem to be grounded with what I'd call the "general scouting consensus". He was named the best defenseman in a strong hockey conference, the Big Ten, as a draft eligible and looked every bit the MVP on a Top 5 team in the country. Levshunov was viewed as an all-around DMan with a high ceiling and safe floor, with the added bonus of being an RHD, and that's why he went Number 2 in the draft, and had he not gone Number 2, probably goes Number 3.
Perhaps a bit more Errors/60, but there's not a ton of draft-eligible DMen in the NCAA to compare and the whole thing to so overblown that I gaslighted myself into thinking I must have been watching someone else with all the Big Ten Hockey I viewed a year ago. Kid like Logan Hensler who is almost exactly a year younger than Levshunov came in with a lot of hype and struggled quite a bit this year. Levshunov and Buium looked like the two best DMen for me, not a ton separation, I could see either being better, but Levshunov a natural righty (not off-hand guy) and about 20 pounds stronger to probably explain why he was ahead on most lists. I thought Buium would go third to Anaheim but he ended up falling, which worked out well for Minnesota.I was watching every shift and Lev left his brain at home on many of them. Clip hunting for errors can mislead people but not when you can get a whole highlight reel of them from any three game sample.
Damn, I thought there was an update on Lev after the last game in Rockford.
Instead we're just turd tusslin'. Okay.
Anyways, as a Hawk fan dude was not my first choice and the IQ thing was just the same as what I saw. His blunders, oof. Watched a good bit of him in the NCAA and I'm not sure I've seen a guy get away with more epic goofs but they rarely landed him a -. Figured it was mostly luck. Couldn't deny the good parts though.
In the AHL I expected a rough first year, but he was definitely less mistake prone after a short while and in no time extremely confident all over. When he was called up I expected a certain amount of said goofs as well, even less in the big league? Hoping he continues this trajectory, the guy can be all over the ice at incredible angles in one or two strides, that cheat code gives him a huge presence to unexpectedly step up anywhere in all 3 zones which he does when he's at his best.
Fingers crossed.