Toggle sidebar

WWE: Raw and Smackdown Part 4 - The Paul Levesque Era

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jussi said:
But there's no rope breaks. They use ropes to break up a submission hold, but they've made it clear that the one aplying the hold can do it longer, thus causing more "damage".


---------------------------------------------


According to Fightful Select, there are no supernatural elements planned for the Wyatt Sicks.
Click to expand...
It doesn’t matter, you eventually have to break because the match can’t end.
 
Jussi said:
The only reason they break the hold is because the opponent uses the ropes to achieve that, not because the ref tells them to.
Click to expand...
Yes, because the opponent presumably knows that the match still can’t end in the ropes.
 
Jussi said:
But there's no rope breaks. They use ropes to break up a submission hold, but they've made it clear that the one aplying the hold can do it longer, thus causing more "damage".


---------------------------------------------


According to Fightful Select, there are no supernatural elements planned for the Wyatt Sicks.
Click to expand...
There are rope breaks if a guys legs are on the ropes during a pin or under the ropes. Thus. Rope break.
 
Jussi said:
Yes, in normal matches. We were talking about No DQ matches.
Click to expand...

Pretty sure they're talking about pinning dude.

No, a rope break doesn't require a submission release because they can't be DQ'ed. But you can't pin a guy if his leg is on or under the rope in a No DQ. Maybe Falls Count Anywhere? Dunno, never really seen that scenario.
 
FriendlyGhost92 said:
Pretty sure they're talking about pinning dude.

No, a rope break doesn't require a submission release because they can't be DQ'ed. But you can't pin a guy if his leg is on or under the rope in a No DQ. Maybe Falls Count Anywhere? Dunno, never really seen that scenario.
Click to expand...
No, GKJ and I were talking about No DQ matches.
 
Jussi said:
Neither of us were talking about pinfalls in No DQ matches but rope breaks.
Click to expand...
But a pinfall when a foot is on the rope or under a rope even in a No DQ match considered a rope break, at least what I remember. I've seen refs count to 5 in No DQ matches. I think it was a Jericho match. He had him in the walls and the ref was counting for him to break the hold, lol.

At least I think it was Jericho. I definitely remember thinking "Wait, what?"
 
Sheppy said:
But a pinfall when a foot is on the rope or under a rope even in a No DQ match considered a rope break, at least what I remember. I've seen refs count to 5 in No DQ matches. I think it was a Jericho match. He had him in the walls and the ref was counting for him to break the hold, lol.

At least I think it was Jericho. I definitely remember thinking "Wait, what?"
Click to expand...
That was a ref/continuity error.
 
i remember a match where Cole was like 'there are no rope breaks in a no DQ match' only to have Kevin Owens (?) get a rope break.

then they played it off as if the ref just made a mistake
 
Why is it they always job out the women’s tag champions? lol. It just makes them look so weak constantly
 
tvv-eIvdEnj-heMDMVLC-XbHRiDWuLNTEh4ot1MsSKHQ0YPGFAlyfKUJIoMpGqxBMxGYngdlVvrdCRM=s1024-rw-nd-v1
 
  • Love
Reactions: Bunch of Jurcos
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom