F.
He wouldn't pay the price for Tanev who would have been a perfect solution. Tanev may have been the player to help us transform the D and win a cup.
Then over paid for a bunch of defesnmen who don't do anything to improve the team. So we gave up a bunch of picks for no reason imo.
He totally mismanaged this whole situation. Treliving sucks.
I gave it an F too, but for very different reasons. I would have liked to have seen a HUGE deal, of some sort, to change the culture of the team.
As Leafs GM, I would have gone to all of the core 4 looking for one of them, targeting Nylander, to waive their NTC/NMC. It likely would have been a totally futile request, however it might have sent a message to these under performing overpaid core that their inconsistent efforts during games is unacceptable.
I would have tried to trade Nylander, Samsonov, and our 1st round pick, to Calgary for Markstrom, Weegar and Kadri. Sure, some cap gymnastics would have to been done to accommodate the cap hits, however something BIG needs to happen to change the continually failing culture of this team.
As for grabbing Tanev, would he have really moved the 'compete' needle enough for our Leafs. I doubt that very much. Besides, he'd just be a huge target for the Bruins to deliberately injure by accident. Yes, I'm looking at you Marchand, you f***ing dirty rat!
Also don't forget that the Bruins also added Maroon, so they'll have 2 'goons' looking to target an injury prone Tanev !!!
Ah well, I'm just a hard done by Leafs fan waiting to see my Leafs win ONE more Stanley Cup before I'm 6 feet under. I was just 12 years old when they last won it in 1967 !!