Player Discussion: Rasmus Kupari

Jet

Chibby!
Jul 20, 2004
34,197
35,635
Florida
Just to note... Given Kupari's ice time, if he scored at the same rate as most bottom 6 forwards (including Lowry, Iafallo, etc.) then he'd be expected to score about 4 or 5 goals in 70 games. So his drought isn't that remarkable. He's had very little ice time and all at 5v5 on the 4th line or on the PK.

I see signs of more offense, but more importantly, he's playing an effective 200 foot game on an effective 4th line.
So you're saying there's a chance of my 10-15-25? 🤣
 

SLAYER

Cilantro Connoisseur
Oct 26, 2012
5,490
6,527
Winnipeg
I'm assuming that this data is coming from a wearable technology... I've seen a couple of different types out there.

I believe some game equipment (and jerseys maybe?) and pucks are chipped to track this data. This is how they get skating speed, puck speed, can produce visualizations, gather more shot/metric data, etc.

This has been happening for a few years now:

The NHL Puck and Player Tracking technology will include 14-16 antennae installed in the arena rafters; four cameras to support the tracking functionality; one sensor placed on the shoulder pads of every player on each team; and 40 pucks manufactured with a sensor inside for each game. The technology is to be deployed in all 31 NHL arenas at some point during the 2019-20 season.

 

Jet

Chibby!
Jul 20, 2004
34,197
35,635
Florida
Depends on ice-time, but based on his play so far this season I think that might be in reach if he plays 10-12 even-strength minutes all season.
I think the way that line has started I could see Arniel trusting them and deploying them more often when we don't necessarily need offense - so maybe it's possible?
 

DRW204

Registered User
Dec 26, 2010
23,066
28,545
I believe some game equipment (and jerseys maybe?) and pucks are chipped to track this data. This is how they get skating speed, puck speed, can produce visualizations, gather more shot/metric data, etc.

This has been happening for a few years now:



yes this is all based on the NHL Edge data.

they publish stats on zone time too which i've seen brought up on this forum often.

really the % of zone time is negligible b/w the Jets fwds, it's what you do with it. for the most part, we're talking couple % points of even strength TOI for the top-9ers. this is based on last year's NHL edge data against GF-GA for example (didn't know the proper thread for this so mods can move if necessary):

1729537037608.png
 
Last edited:

Buffdog

Registered User
Feb 13, 2019
8,330
20,235
a little refresh on the Jets fwd speed stats and how Rasmus Ferrari is rating...

View attachment 928881
Considering that the y axis only has a 3.5 mph variance, where the guys fall on the x axis is much more impressive to me

Also, since it's absolute numbers, the fact that Barron and Kupari have that many instances is super impressive due to the fact that they play fewer minutes
 

DRW204

Registered User
Dec 26, 2010
23,066
28,545
Considering that the y axis only has a 3.5 mph variance, where the guys fall on the x axis is much more impressive to me

Also, since it's absolute numbers, the fact that Barron and Kupari have that many instances is super impressive due to the fact that they play fewer minutes
Yeah doubt most can really notice a 0.5 mph difference which doesn't even equate to 1 full kmh. The instances of reaching a certain threshold is much more interesting.
 

FlappyGiraffe

Go Jets Go
Sponsor
Jul 3, 2015
2,333
4,285
Winnipeg
Considering that the y axis only has a 3.5 mph variance, where the guys fall on the x axis is much more impressive to me

Also, since it's absolute numbers, the fact that Barron and Kupari have that many instances is super impressive due to the fact that they play fewer minutes
I wonder if it's because of the lower minutes that they are able to go full tilt more frequently than the guys who play more
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad