Fist of Fury
Wang Chung
- Jul 24, 2011
- 582
- 295
It would be worth a lot more if you let the other team talk to him and his agent.
Hartford traded Chris Pronger for Brandon Shanahan. Shanahan hated Hartford and forced his way out within a year to the Detroit superteam. Hartford recieved Keith Primeau. Primeau was flipped two and a half years later for Rod Brind'amour.Canes going all in and then being like "oh wait nvm" is hilariously terrible asset management.
Can someone remind me of times this has happened in the past?
why is it always the Habs fans that think the Canes are cheap? If you’ve been paying any attention, money isn’t the issue, it’s whether or not he wants to spend 8yrs in Raleigh or go to UFA.Carolina can waste 8m on Martinook and Kotkaniemi but not willing to pay for the guy they traded for?
It all sounds like Necas wanted out of Carolina if that is the case.
Not saying they are cheap. They are wasting 8m for easily replaceable players.why is it always the Habs fans that think the Canes are cheap? If you’ve been paying any attention, money isn’t the issue, it’s whether or not he wants to spend 8yrs in Raleigh or go to UFA.
At 28, he's likely peaked and a team will be paying him for past stats with MacKinnon and Makar as his teammates.
Pretty much. Most teams will not be getting the Colorado version of Rantanen. Yet they will be paying him like Mack and Makar are still feeding him looks all game long.At 28, he's likely peaked and a team will be paying him for past stats with MacKinnon and Makar as his teammates.
Lots of speculation sure, but the last think I’d call Elliotte Friedman would be a “hack”Man there is a whole lot of speculation based on the speculation of notable media hacks going on in this thread
Vegas will find a way to get him for 25% of his cap hit via double retention, and only give up their former 1st round picks Brenden Donk or Zach Flibbett.Friedman says IF Carolina does trade him as a rental, there's pretty much every team in the mix who can go for him, as the canes retaining 50% puts him at just over 2 mill.
Teams that know they can't extend him will look at him and mentioned a lot of the top teams and then postulated what the price might be since so many teams can be on him at his price tag at 50%.
He's speculating on the "reports" of others, which is those hacks pulling this shit out of their ass.Lots of speculation sure, but the last think I’d call Elliotte Friedman would be a “hack”
Just because you don’t like what someone is saying doesnt mean you have to try to discredit them or play victim, as you like to do constantly on the Canes’ board.He's speculating on the "reports" of others, which is those hacks pulling this shit out of their ass.
Rantanan has only played 1 home game since he was traded. He's actually been here a total of like 3 days with all the away games and 4N. Nobody is thinking of trading him, noone. If anything, we just want him to get settled in before we begin contract negotiations.
Yes they can but not sure if they have cap space to eat it and take another player.back. we have seen trades with 3 teams involved both eating 50%.I am not sure that they can retain another 50%, can they? (Genuinely asking, I am not sure)
So basically Huberdeau v.2At 28, he's likely peaked and a team will be paying him for past stats with MacKinnon and Makar as his teammates.
While I don't discount the possibility that they can flip him what smoke has there been? Has anyone reported a source within the organization talking about the possibility of flipping him? Or is it just people making a (logical to be fair) jump that Carolina may not want to risk what happened with Guentzel happening again? Especially given what it cost to get Rantanen.Just because you don’t like what someone is saying doesnt mean you have to try to discredit them or play victim, as you like to do constantly on the Canes’ board.
Theres certainly enough smoke around the Canes potentially flipping Rantanen to consider it a real possibility.
I am gonna go on a hunch that Carolina gm is likely having some buyer remorse….and now he’s stuck between a rock and a hard place. Flip him for .50 cents on the dollar or keep him and sign him to a monster contract hoping he lives up to it.Just because you don’t like what someone is saying doesnt mean you have to try to discredit them or play victim, as you like to do constantly on the Canes’ board.
Theres certainly enough smoke around the Canes potentially flipping Rantanen to consider it a real possibility.
Or you keep Rantanen and try to win the Stanley Cup this year.I am gonna go on a hunch that Carolina gm is likely having some buyer remorse….and now he’s stuck between a rock and a hard place. Flip him for .50 cents on the dollar or keep him and sign him to a monster contract hoping he lives up to it.
I mean that could happen, and use the Rantanen $$ to go shopping, maybe marner?Or you keep Rantanen and try to win the Stanley Cup this year.
If he walks he walks that's life in the big city.
I’d say that Friedman doesn’t speculate that much unless there’s something to it. If he keeps banging the drum saying they may look to flip him if not signed, I take that as smoke for sure.While I don't discount the possibility that they can flip him what smoke has there been? Has anyone reported a source within the organization talking about the possibility of flipping him? Or is it just people making a (logical to be fair) jump that Carolina may not want to risk what happened with Guentzel happening again? Especially given what it cost to get Rantanen.
Your whole team is easily replaceable players. What the Canes pay Kotkaniemi and Martinook doesn't really affect anything to do with Rantanen.Not saying they are cheap. They are wasting 8m for easily replaceable players.