Post-Game Talk: Rangers vs. Lightning 02/27/19 - 7:30 EST

[RangerLifer]

They think he is an issue, after getting man handled by Boston...

Cooper is our weakest Link?

I have no words for this, only that I wish we had 100 points now, I would be putting Quinn on a pedestal right now. In fact we are losing, and have been very happy with what Quinn has done with this roster.

LOL!! I guess they expect to win every game. I don't think he's a BAD coach, just not likable.

 

[Leonardo87]

LOL!! I guess they expect to win every game. I don't think he's a BAD coach, just not likable.

Cooper has made some good decisions, like how he rested Callahan, and he has been playing his best hockey in years. Stralman had struggled this season and has also been getting rest as well and it has helped him to find his game again. But when your team has like a 16 point lead in the conference, stuff like this can be done. But the real challenge comes in April, and if Tampa some how faces Trotz and the Islanders could see an upset unless Cooper can make adjustments. The play of Kucherov, Point, Vasy, and Stamkos finding resurgence has made Cooper's job easier no doubt, but he still has done good things outside the success of these players helping them to win.

As per the arrogance, well I can see it, so I hear ya, it has also trickled down to the team and the fans. I honestly don't like it. Never saw that attitude with the Rangers when they were winning, it was more like a yeah we know we are doing well but are being cautiously optimistic.

 

[Kaapo Cabana]

I really dislike this term, its technically not even true.

In my eyes......BOTH teams EARNED that 1 point, via a tie in regulation. In the olden days, you kiss your sister and go home. With ONLY 1 point.
Technically they didn't LOSE in regulation, yet eventually they did lose.....ergo the term "loser point". Still, I believe that to be WRONG.
Now, BOTH TEAMS have the "opportunity" to get an "extra point". Shouldn't it be termed "bonus or charity" point?

Or, am I making a "loser point"?
On a thread no one will visit as soon a gdt goes up. Lmaoam.

Completely agree.

It's not a "loser point". It's the point for the regulation tie.

If OT was actually 5 v 5 hockey, I don't have a problem with no points being awarded if a team loses. The whole reason a regulation tie point was added back was because the league knew 4 v 4 and now 3 v 3 is a gimmick.

@Machinehead

Do you want to post it? or should I?

 

[Machinehead]

@Machinehead

Do you want to post it? or should I?

You take this one

 

[Kaapo Cabana]

 

[Larrybiv]

They think he is an issue, after getting man handled by Boston...

Cooper is our weakest Link?

I have no words for this, only that I wish we had 100 points now, I would be putting Quinn on a pedestal right now. In fact we are losing, and have been very happy with what Quinn has done with this roster.

Yeah, isn't it obvious? If he weren't such a lousy coach, they could easily have 120 pts. instead of "only 103, and leading the league by a country mile". Jeez.
And we thought we were perfectionists, ungrateful and the likes. Jeez. He does seem cocky though.....supposen its because of that cool demeanor. I should know.