In before @Thirty One makes fun of the title saying 775 million per year.
We don't, but do you really think there's a team out there that is looking to protect 2 of the players you mentioned, and is willing to move 2 other players to accomplish it? I doubt it. We could make that deal with Vegas perhaps, since they aren't part of the draft, but I can't see any other team being interested. Most protection spots are already set at this point.
I don't know. But I'd like the choice of who to protect to come down to those two. Maybe protect Rooney and trade Blackwell.Ok, so which of Rooney and Blackwell do you protect? Because the other will be exposed
Speaks to the level of trust Gallant has in him. #ToTheMoonIn before @Thirty One makes fun of the title saying 775 million per year.
How is that possible? He's got all the potential in the world (for 3rd line types?). He has 47 career games under his belt and hasn't done poorly at all, despite being on a very short leash under Quinn. He's shown sweet hands and he's got the skill you can't teach.
Speaks to the level of trust Gallant has in him. #ToTheMoon
I don't know. But I'd like the choice of who to protect to come down to those two. Maybe protect Rooney and trade Blackwell.
Yeah I get that and won't be angry if Blackie protected and Gauth exposedMy point is, if you're like me and think Gauthier will be a non-factor, why bother keeping him? It may be easy to replace Blackwell or Rooney (I'm not so sure it's so easy to find equal replacements for their cost--the Rangers did very well with these two signings) but why replace them if it's just to keep a spare forward who himself may be out of the organization in a year?
He hasn't fulfilled his potential. Why is that? Lack of opportunity? He's not that good? I think it's both, but the former is driven by the latter.
Either way, I stand by my remark. He's here because there's a sense that there's the potential for him to be more, not because of what he has actually done at the highest level.
I mean, sure? But you still have to show something. Gauthier didn't show a whole lot, which is why he spent half of the year not playing and the other half of the year playing sparingly.This is why every young player is here. Potential.
Rooney is fine for what he is, but he’s so so so easily replaceable.
I doubt Seattle would take him anyway.
And, for a team that has committed itself (supposedly) to being harder to play against, Rooney and Blackwell were two of the harder guys to play against. Not from a talent perspective, but in terms of bodying up, having a good motor, fighting for every puck, etc. Not that I think either is special, but it would be funny to allow them potentially to be chosen while keeping a guy who was literally invisible on most of of his shifts.The Rooney and Blackwells of a team are good for morale and are established with the guys in the locker room. Yes, they can be replaced easily but maybe not what they bring to a room. I think they are well liked. They have bled for the guys already, its why I would at least keep Rooney.
Rooney is fine for what he is, but he’s so so so easily replaceable.
I doubt Seattle would take him anyway.
I don't know. But I'd like the choice of who to protect to come down to those two. Maybe protect Rooney and trade Blackwell.
Seattle:As an example the Flyers have are supposedly going to expose all of Voracek, van Riemsdyk and Gostisbehere.
Okay, talk to me at the end of the season.“In the end…”?
End of what?
He’s played 1/2 a season over three years and he’s only 23, a big guy which is a type that we know take longer to marinate.
Take a season to look at him, for heaven's sake.