Off Sides
Registered User
- Sep 8, 2008
- 9,755
- 5,585
I feel like we are starting to go in circles. As I said in my first post, my concern with Panarin is that we would try to force the issue rather than let the kids develop, or conversely, that we would waste Panarin's prime while waiting for them to develop.
If we didn't sign Panarin, we'd still have to wait 2 years for those contracts to come off the books before we could realistically compete for the cup. Let's just hope that the kids develop quickly and that Panarin remains elite for most/all of his contract.
A post I said I agreed with, the following conversation about that concern being mitigated was were our disagreement came about I believe.