Cool BINGO card.The Bruins used to have individual banners for division champs, etc (mostly to compete with all the Celtics championship banners) but have since consolidated it to 1 banner for each non Cup milestone and they list the years
![]()
![]()
Cool BINGO card.The Bruins used to have individual banners for division champs, etc (mostly to compete with all the Celtics championship banners) but have since consolidated it to 1 banner for each non Cup milestone and they list the years
![]()
![]()
With one cup in 84 years they'll have to celebrate what they can
It’s the wording. “President’s Trophy” is a thing, it’s respectable. “Regular Season Champ” is mockable and incredibly dumb.
Smartest post in a thread that was created only to poke fun.The Rangers have a banner for this that goes back well before the NHL created the President's Trophy, so they're probably just trying to be consistent with their own internal precedent. The President's Trophy only goes back to 1986, and the Rangers history goes back a lot further than that.
This seems like the most sensible way to acknowledge non-cup winning achievementsThe Bruins used to have individual banners for division champs, etc (mostly to compete with all the Celtics championship banners) but have since consolidated it to 1 banner for each non Cup milestone and they list the years
![]()
![]()
and people shit on the caps for raising their president trophy banners this is much worsethe rangers are an original six franchise they are above this
kobe Bryant once said the only banners that should be raised are title ones. this doesn't count
The Oilers 1st "NHL League Championship" banner in 83-84 is named like "League Champions", but all subsequent as "NHL Presidents Trophy". Given the color coding it's pretty easy to figure out what the banners mean regardless of the name, while maintaining the accurate accomplishment on the banner.The Rangers have a banner for this that goes back well before the NHL created the President's Trophy, so they're probably just trying to be consistent with their own internal precedent. The President's Trophy only goes back to 1986, and the Rangers history goes back a lot further than that.
Devil fans haven't said shit about this. Read the thread, none of these posters are Devils fans.
Although, I can see why you'd assume Devil fans would jump at the chance to mock the Rangers, but we haven't done it at all here.
I was shocked as well that no Devil fans were in here seems like a pretty easy target. Even if it's a stupid thing to care about.As a Rangers fan I agree and think this was an uncalled shot against Devils fans.
At the same time, it's a bit unusual to NOT see a Devils fan ragging on the Rangers.
Likely has something to do with having a good start so far.
What does that mean, they lost the AFC championship game?
If they’re giving out banners for that can the Jets get a couple?
The Oilers can do what they like, and the Rangers can do what *they* like. Arena banners are not standardized between teams and never have been.The Oilers 1st "NHL League Championship" banner in 83-84 is named like "League Champions", but all subsequent as "NHL Presidents Trophy". Given the color coding it's pretty easy to figure out what the banners mean regardless of the name, while maintaining the accurate accomplishment on the banner.
Pretty bizarre to declare an "own internal precedent" imo... would be like putting up Prince of Wales and Patrick banners in the 2020's
What an original take.
How else are the casuals attending the games at the MSG supposed to know their team is good?
Does it bother people or are they laughing?Imagine being so soft that this bothers you.
The repeated use of a banner than is 10 years old, from an entirely different sport, done in an entirely different city and arena, signifying entirely different things leads me to believe that if anyone is “laughing” at the banner the Rangers hung either have nothing better to do or are actively looking for reasons to take pot-shots at a franchise and/or its fans.
If that’s how you find humor, so be it, but might I recommend a large number of stand-up comics instead?
Honestly, reading through this thread, it just makes me sad that so many people completely devalue any accomplishment over the course of an 82 game season between October and March because a team might get eliminated in 4 games in April
Winning the President's Trophy should absolutely mean more for a franchise than it currently does. It and the Stanley Cup should be the 2 most coveted trophies in hockey, either showing consistent dominance over the long haul of a season, or the ability to get hot at the right moment.
Didnt the Capitals struggle to get 100 people in the building before ovechkin?
The Rangers haven't had a year with a sub-15,000 average attendance since 1967.
LOL, somebody took it personally.
Don’t worry, your Rangers have a big enough fan base that they can have many casual fans or even celebrities who know nothing about the game in attendance.
This has nothing to do with the Capitals and their smaller fan base.