Yeah, it is a prospect poll, with absolutely no defined criteria for how people are to vote. Some people vote on upside, others on likelihood of making it, some on things that I find irrelevant like positional need in the system, etc. It's all over the place and it always has been.This is a best prospect poll is it not? Just checking.
The comments speak for themselves, the voting has nothing to do with on ice performance. People Don’t have to agree, but let it be based on facts not on a vendetta against the player. That’s what happening, which is why there should be no reason to keep him on the poll.
People have their reasons not to vote for him and that's totally fine, because again, there isn't a defined criteria to be used for voting. The idea that after we've done this thing dozens upon dozens of times over the years, that we should add an asterisk and declare the voting "unfair" because some people don't like the results for one guy, is absolutely preposterous.