Rangers have lost 13 out of their last 17 games. What would you do if you were Dolan (the owner of the team) or Drury (the GM)?

Emperoreddy

Show Me What You Got!
Apr 13, 2010
135,331
85,674
New Jersey, Exit 16E
It's not all that surprising to see guys lose confidence and become listless with a stretch like they have had.

I've unfortunately seen enough death marches by my own team to see those signs.

This team has gone through a lot of coaches over the past so many years, I find it hard to believe another coach firing is going to be the magic fix.

Center depth has always been an issue with that roster and it's worse with Mika looking legitimately cooked as a player.

Trouba looks cooked. Lindgren has been bad. Down years for Miller and Fox. Igor is slumping.

The real issue seems to be the guys they need to move on from to try and retool this roster aren't actually movable thanks to their contracts.

They tried to force Trouba out and that failed.
 

Pablo El Perro

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Oct 10, 2007
26,880
14,641
Play out the season, see how they do on the playoffs, decide what moves to make then.
 

Team_Spirit

95% Elliotte
Jul 3, 2002
40,155
22,942
20240307_195427.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jauffre

Fatass

Registered User
Apr 17, 2017
24,305
16,037
If I were owner I’d get my GM to sign Shisterkin. He’s the key to the club having any success. It’s stupid the owner hasn’t told the GM to sign this player. It’s no mere coincidence the team has gone in the sewer since the whole Shisterkin contract issues have come forward.
 

Gilmour1996

Registered User
Oct 16, 2022
1,182
1,432
Call Gary and have him fix things so that Rags are the least penalized team in the league.
 

Szechwan

Registered User
Sep 13, 2006
6,225
6,479
Said it back then signing Panarin was a mistake and it pushed their rebuild forward. Got a lot of shit from ranger fans....
As you deserved to, it's a dumb take. The Rangers accelerated rebuild is one of hockeys quickest turnarounds, they won the mfing President's trophy and almost made the final - things that are the explicit end goal of every rebuild that has ever happened.

It may have resulted in a short window (that remains to be seen), but that doesn't mean it was the wrong call. If they'd continued their rebuild slowly they could very well be in an even worse position. Most rebuilds go absolutely nowhere.
 

chizzler

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jan 11, 2006
13,875
7,146
You get one freebie fire as GM where you get to stay relatively blameless, no matter if it goes well or poorly. Gerard Gallant was that guy for Drury. Now if he fires Laviolette it is a gamble for him because if he fires Lavi and the Rangers still suck, then Drury looks bad and is up next on the chopping block.

He's probably desperate to make some sort of trade(s) to shake up that roster but he has a lot of difficult contracts to work with that probably nobody would want to pay equal value for. If he did trade, he'd have to accept a loss in value.
They fired Gorton and put in Drury. How’s that looking now? Gorton was a good GM. Big mistake. He was building a good team. Oh well.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MakoSlade

bobholly39

Registered User
Mar 10, 2013
23,519
16,961
I still think this is not only a playoff team, but a top ~3-5 cup contender.

It's a long season, they'll figure it out. It doesn't necessarily mean do nothing - you can fire coach, gm, or make a big trade - but in any of those scenarios - and also if you do nothing - I figure they'll just bounce back soon.
 

OtherThingsILike

Registered User
May 6, 2020
1,812
1,562
Pittsburgh
I'm hoping they make a panic trade for Marcus Pettersson. I'm not saying I think it will happen, but I hope so.
A non-panic trade for him might be a good idea.
 

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
29,734
11,556
As you deserved to, it's a dumb take. The Rangers accelerated rebuild is one of hockeys quickest turnarounds, they won the mfing President's trophy and almost made the final - things that are the explicit end goal of every rebuild that has ever happened.

It may have resulted in a short window (that remains to be seen), but that doesn't mean it was the wrong call. If they'd continued their rebuild slowly they could very well be in an even worse position. Most rebuilds go absolutely nowhere.
What hurt the NYR is that the consensus top picks when they had them, have not hit the way you would have hoped. Took Laf a while, and he's turning out to be a good player, but not the what you'd hope for a top pick. Same with Kakko. Plus, Krav didn't pan out. Had they taken Dobson, a RD, that's a valuable asset that they could have moved to improve the roster.

With regards to Trouba, once July hit, his NMC went to a MNTC for half the league. Guessing NYR tried, but were unable to find a deal to their liking for the 16 teams he could have been moved to.
 

TheBeerNerd

Registered User
Nov 13, 2024
506
1,032
NY side of the Hudson River
If I were Dolan, I'd commit seppuku live on the next Knicks or Rangers halftime/intermission show. It'd really make the fans happy.

Serious answer: fire Drury, get someone who knows what he's doing on GM, stay the hell out of his way and just write the checks as he makes hockey decisions.

Comedy option: fire Drury, hire Jim Benning as GM.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dialamo

Peltz

Registered User
Oct 4, 2019
3,885
5,541
I mean, it's still not accurate. The whole point was to compete with the Panarin/Zibanejad/Kreider/Trouba core in the short term and then compete with the Lafrenière/Kakko/Chytil/Miller core in the long term. Cuylle might be putting himself into that core with his play. Fox and Shesterkin bridge the two. The short term competitiveness happened and now they're in a transitionary season, IMO. A lot of their youth is hitting right on schedule for normal rebuilding teams (5-7 years in).

There's a reason why the NMCs of Kreider and Trouba turned into M-NTCs later in their contracts. The same thing happens with Trocheck's contract on July 1. It was supposed to give them flexibility to transition from one core to the other when we reached this point. And to Drury's credit, he did try to do it with Trouba back in June but unforeseen circumstances prevented it. The big problem, and this is really on Drury, was giving Zibanejad a full NMC through the life of his deal. Bad, bad move. It's different than Panarin's contract, which expires after next year. Zibanejad has 3 more seasons after this one.

I think the main problem the team has is essentially in the conflict between the two cores. I don't mean that they're literally fighting each other. But the older core is preventing the younger core from taking central roles on the team, even when the younger players are often better (with the exception of Panarin). It causes strife, both for the vets who are trying to hold on to the roles they established and for the kids who are pushing at them. Lafrenière, Kakko and Cuylle are better than Kreider at this point. Chytil is better than Zibanejad and, at least so far this year, Trocheck. But yet the offense isn't focused on them in combination with what Panarin can still give, which is still a lot. The coach has been reluctant to remove guys from roles because they earned it in the past over the span of years. I get it to an extent. How could you not run back the same powerplay that was so potent in the run to the President's Trophy last year? Laviolette has been slow to react to the "ground truth" and that's only exacerbated the situation. We see some glimmers of recognition in the ice time spread every so often, but it isn't enough. I don't even think there's any conscious awareness of this strife, but I think it exists.

It's a hard situation to manage, and this season might just be a wash because of it. There are no easy fixes.
I think there is a lot of truth to all of this. Well said. Combine this with some issues on defense and I think that's what is happening here.
 

Peltz

Registered User
Oct 4, 2019
3,885
5,541
I dont get the Rangers panic, both goalies are over .900 and they have a winning record. And have 5 players at or within 3 points of 20 points. I get Igor isnt playing elite hockey, but surely they can still win with .900 goaltending? No?
Those numbers don't really tell the story. You gotta watch them play.

They're a total mess and give up over a dozen grade AAA chances per game without generating much 5v5. It has always been an issue for them, but it's gotten so much worse this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Slaydagnar

Peltz

Registered User
Oct 4, 2019
3,885
5,541
Why in the world would you make a thread like this on the main boards? What’s answers are you thinking you are gonna get?

Sometimes my NYR brethren just don’t think….
I want to talk about a hockey team with a legitimately interesting predicament on a hockey forum. I don't see the issue.

Getting some perspectives outside the Rangers fanbase (who, no offense, can be an echo chamber at times) was the goal here. And so far there have been some interesting takes all over the place.

I don't care if other fans use this opportunity to poke fun at us - I'd do the same. But I also knew some people would provide some interesting insights as they have. Why else come here if you don't want to talk hockey and play armchair GM? It's half the fun.
 
  • Like
Reactions: brentashton

Ghost of Murph

Registered User
Dec 23, 2023
1,464
2,374
I wouldn't do anything right now. Decent enough roster with multiple guys slumping. See if they can work their way out of the funk. Lavi is a good coach. If the slumping continues he will be the obvious fall guy and the GM will see if they can get a bounce with a new coach. I just don't see this as a coaching issue, though, rather a players need to get their head out of their ass issue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VivaLasVegas

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad