GDT: Rangers @ Flyers Pt. II

  • Thread starter Thread starter *Bob Richards*
  • Start date Start date
  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Can we get Diaz? Stralman cant score a goal if he was one on one against the goalie 10 times
 
This piss poor effort is atrocious. Not only do they lose but they lose big and give Philly all the momentum and confidence in the world going into game 7. Worst case scenario.
 
It's not that I hate him. It's just I feel $9 million could have been spent more wisely. If I was GM, I wouldn't want to build my team around paying a goalie $9 million. This team needs a #1 center badly, and $9 million tied up with Hank will be a problem. Not to mention, the man is getting older. It's not like he's 24 years old here.

Exactly. Why would you pay that much money to a goalie who isn't clutch in the playoffs and is at the age where he is starting to decline? Its just a poor investment. Lundqvist is not a top goalie in this league.
 
I've calmed down a lot cause I just accepted that this team will not win a championship. It's a lot better when you get to that point with a team. You can just enjoy the games instead of being POed all the time.

LET'S GO METS!!!
 
Under physical play and a heavy forecheck he has always been horrible.

His specialty is slow, methodical games. Not high pressure situations that require decisive action.

Playoffs exposing his weakness. He, and some advanced stat magic, had me fooled for most of the season.
 
Unless we win a Cup with him, I will forever hate that contract. I just don't understand spending so much on a goalie no matter how good he is in a cap world.

Not that I have any faith in Sather to spend it differently or better.

I just wanted to clear something up there. I love watching Hank, and he's one of, and probably my favorite player. Love the player, dislike the contract. That money could have been used to help out in other areas, namely C as we desperately need a #1. And I'm not saying this because they are down 4-0 to Philly right now. This is something I've felt the second that contract was announced.
 
Lundqvist gave up one iffy goal. The other three were a result of chaos in front of him. There has been zero chaos in front of Mason.

With all the whining about Nash not putting up points, the golden boy leading scorer has been absent since Game 1.

All of you weenies saying you won't watch Game 7 are liars.

Anyone who thinks the Flyers will win Game 7 and wish to place that wager, please PM me if any of you are really serious.

One horrible goal (breakaway) and another goal where he wasn't even close to being positioned right (4th). Nash had a very good first period but, like everyone else (including Hank), stopped giving a **** in the 2nd.

I think we will win Game 7 just like I thought we'd win tonight.
 
Exactly. Why would you pay that much money to a goalie who isn't clutch in the playoffs and is at the age where he is starting to decline? Its just a poor investment. Lundqvist is not a top goalie in this league.

Lundqvist is not a top goalie in the league? REALLY? He played awful tonight, but come on.
 
Defense has been horrendous this game....along with PP of course....but...LGR!!!!!!
 
What kind of team just quits after 1 goal?

What a way to lose.

This could carry over tomorrow
 
Did he just say a major comeback...why i never though he'd ask....LGR!!!!!!!...for the greatest comeback in Rangers history....
 
“@PLeonardNYDN: Cam Talbot in goal for the Rangers to start third period. Lundqvist resting for Game 7 tomorrow night”
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad