Proposal: Rakell for Buchnevich?

Kurt Cobain

Registered User
Mar 30, 2004
5,947
259
The
I'm biased because I'm a Rangers fan, has nothing to do with my username, which is what you mentioned. Even if I am biased, I can tell the difference when I'm biased and would believe what I'm saying if I wasn't biased. I believe what I'm saying here. My opinion wouldn't be any different if I was a fan of another team, and had the same knowledge about the player.

I didn't make the thread, I didn't say I'd make the trade. As for why the Ducks would make the trade, the player won't sign a contract. Do you see how many Rakell threads there are on the trade boards? Clearly there's something up with his contract situation. I don't know why they'd want to trade him, otherwise, but the contract situation is a good reason to trade him.

Ugh it wasn't just your name that made me come to the biased statement and I know the Rakell situation, I have actually commented on some. I said why would they trade him for a prospect. Everyone's biased to their own prospects. Plus you called him a top 10 prospect, he isn't probably top 20 or 25 and that's not an insult it's a compliment considering where you drafted him. You guys shouldn't be trading you're only prospect who looks like a sure thing anyway or only future top 6 player at least. Plus the Ducks are in win now mode so I can't see them trading for a prospect. This trade doesn't fit either team in my opinion.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad