OT: Raise the Jolly Roger: Congrats to the Houston Cheaters on their win

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yeah, I like the strategy of following Thompson with Peters because it's such a drastic shift. Shelton has been quick with his hook early on and even though Thompson came through big early on, I don't see why you don't pull the switch there with how bad he was missing. Not like he's going back out for the next inning anyways.

Hopefully Peters can at least give some length so the bullpen doesn't end up taxed, but this is looking exactly like a road series vs. the Brewers would be expected to look.
 
Yeah, I like the strategy of following Thompson with Peters because it's such a drastic shift. Shelton has been quick with his hook early on and even though Thompson came through big early on, I don't see why you don't pull the switch there with how bad he was missing. Not like he's going back out for the next inning anyways.

Hopefully Peters can at least give some length so the bullpen doesn't end up taxed, but this is looking exactly like a road series vs. the Brewers would be expected to look.

Mission: don't get swept.
 
Question; If Castro continues to rake at Indy, what happens? Is he blocked by Hayes?

No. I don't see us ST-manipulating Castro. Likely Tucker is getting his last shot here. Also VanMeter and Park. I could see us moving out either of them (or Marisnick depending on if he's hitting) pretty easily for Castro if needed.

I'm still very high on the guy and frankly still consider him a top 10 prospect in our system. I know it seems ridiculous but the guy has very high intangibles and confidence. Has power and the ever-attractive defensive versatility. A JHay with power is absolutely a top-10 guy even taking out the outlier 2014.
 
Yeah, I think we are within two weeks or so of some serious roster churn. Castro's inexperienced enough that it's fine for the priority to be on regular ABs, but soon I think we need to cut bait with some guys and turn to fresh blood.

I'm off Tucker, but I do wish we'd just try to stick him in the infield for a while. There's a bit too much of a fetish of positional flexibility for me, and while I see how it can make various part-time players more valuable, the whole thing kind of revolves around Newman IMO. Tucker is what he is, in all likelihood, but we know for certain what Newman is.

We should be actively trying to trade Newman, and if we don't find any decent suitor, we should just play him less for a while. That means playing Castillo and Tucker over him, and then eventually Cruz and Castro. Maybe you reach September and there's still no viable MLB shortstop option, so you retain your non-hitting player and build the rest of the roster around that. I think you can probably find some taker for Newman, because in the right context (as the last player on the roster for defense only) he has a little bit of value. Tucker will be cheaper for longer and can essentially be the same thing: a good defensive SS who can't hit.
 


This is a little bit intriguing, but we'll have to watch it as the sample size gets up to something reasonable. From what I understand via fantasy baseball purposes, smaller sample sizes on offense start to be more meaningful when there are 50 batted ball events. Chavis is just at 18, so not even half.

I like keeping him to a somewhat part-time role, mainly because I think Castillo should be stapled to the 2B job (really, he should be playing SS a lot too, but that's a Newman thing). The big thing to watch with Chavis is probably the chasing and whiffs on fastballs up and above the zone. That's what Boston fans always said was his problem before.
 
  • Like
Reactions: td_ice
They'll "manipulate" Castillo's service time by sending him to AAA once he starts struggling, but they're not going to manipulate his service time for the sake of it.

What will probably happen is that he'll hit a rut in either May or June, the Pirates will send him down for a month to readjust and then he'll get called back up after playing well in AAA. I don't think Castillo has the upside where you even consider the super-two deadline, so he'll only go down enough days this year so that he doesn't accrue a year of service this year.

Edit: oh wait I misread, people were talking about Castro not Castillo.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChaosAgent
I'm off Tucker, but I do wish we'd just try to stick him in the infield for a while. There's a bit too much of a fetish of positional flexibility for me, and while I see how it can make various part-time players more valuable, the whole thing kind of revolves around Newman IMO. Tucker is what he is, in all likelihood, but we know for certain what Newman is.
Yeah I'm at the point where "hey lookie we got Cole Tucker to play outfield!" induces eyerolls.

Great. You got a bad hitter to play bad defense at a spot. When really the only place he's viable is at short - against righties.

The versatility brigade has reached OD territory. There have to be diminishing returns to having 5-6 of these guys on a roster. Like 2-3 max. And it sucks that Cherington has whiffed on the Frazier trade because he overvalued it in Tucapita Marcano.
 
  • Like
Reactions: td_ice
Yikes, Tucker back in RF and VanMeter at 2B over Castillo. The only way the latter makes any sense is if Castillo needs a day or two on the bench to recover from the HBP.... otherwise, yeah, yikes. If we don't get lock down pitching from Brubaker (lol) and some kind of big hit from the top of the lineup, this is basically a forfeit lineup vs. Burnes.
 
There’s no manipulation needed for Castillo he is a free agent because he was in the minors for 6 years the Yankees signed him in 2014 and park for that matter
 
Last edited:
Yikes, Tucker back in RF and VanMeter at 2B over Castillo. The only way the latter makes any sense is if Castillo needs a day or two on the bench to recover from the HBP.... otherwise, yeah, yikes. If we don't get lock down pitching from Brubaker (lol) and some kind of big hit from the top of the lineup, this is basically a forfeit lineup vs. Burnes.

I guess they are really sheltering Castillo against righties.

In fairness Tucker can hit righties pretty well. He's out to lunch against lefties though.
 
There’s no manipulation needed for Castillo he is a free agent because he was in the minors for 6 years the Yankees signed him in 2014 and park for that matter
2 separate things.

But yeah no need to manipulate because hes not good enough a prospect/old enough for it not to be a big deal.
 
It's gonna be a long night huh? haha......

If that was a sample of what we are gonna see from Burnes. Damn his stuff is nasty.
 
Cruz is struggling right now hitting under 200 3 k night maybe they aren’t going to manipulate the service time. He has 1 start in LF but sticking to SS
 
Missed the game but looks like Roansy pitched very well. I am still assuming he will go to AAA when the rosters shrink, but it's really wasting innings for him to pitch there. He's someone who they will manipulate service with, and I guess I could stomach it if they use the excuse of stretching him out as a starter and then get him back up here. If it's possible to just keep him in this role, that would make sense, but almost none of the starters are going to be safe bets for more than 4 innings, so I think there's going to have to be shuffling no matter what is going on with Roansy.

Cruz's slower start probably gives them some more runway for the obvious dampening going on, but I don't think it can be stressed enough that he's been playing in practically winter conditions. That's offensive suppression weather, and it was even more so in St. Paul last week. I didn't see anything tonight, but obviously 3 Ks is a bad night no matter what. He didn't look very good in the game before, but otherwise from the eye test he's been perfectly fine. Hopefully there are no takes based on the small sample in bad weather, but it does at least provide cover // setting that aside, speaks to wanting him to get a groove and come up. Hopefully the weather warms and so does his bat, and we don't play Super Two games over merit.

Even aside from Roansy and Cruz, we should see some roster churn in the next two weeks. Castro is knocking on the door, Castillo needs to play more, maybe there will be some cut from another team worth looking at over Park or VanMeter, and Alford is rehabbing from injury (I'm still willing to give those tools a look given his strong finish last year).
 
Roansy 6 starts in AA and AAA combined is reason enough to send him down this week and call him up in June he needs 20 days to be stretched out and gain a year of control. Park will go down once Alford is off the IL. Howard rehabbing in Indy last night makes it seem he will take Contreras spot
 
  • Like
Reactions: td_ice
Yeah, I think that's likely what's going to happen. I actually just went back and watched his innings, and he was as dominant as suggested. I really think if we were able to do it, keeping him in this role for a month or so would be the best for his development and continuing to carefully monitor his innings, even if at some point they will probably want him to stretch out in the minors, and however it happens, it is a certainty that we'll do what we have to do to get the extra year.

I'm actually not fully confident that Howard will automatically be on the team when his rehab ends. He can still be optioned, whereas a guy like Banda cannot. Peters is also out of options, but Fletcher can be optioned. So unless Howard looks really dominant, I think we'll keep the former options over him for now.

Once we have to go from 28 to 26, though, it's hard to see Contreras sticking. However, it might be possible for us to enter into some kind of shuffling with Contreras and Yajure so that we can continue to use them as bulk relievers in order to manage innings and get experience/challenged at the MLB level. Maybe even to start, Fletcher goes down, and you look for 3 innings another time or two, and then eventually 4 -- realistically, it's unlikely that Brubaker or whoever pitches before Yajure is going to go more than 5 innings.

At some point, maybe the other relievers are too taxed, and so you need to recall Fletcher or Howard and you option Contreras so that he can build up to 5-6 as a starter and come back. I think that makes more sense than immediately sending him down, since he doesn't seem bothered by the bulk role of coming out of the pen. It probably doesn't matter all that much, since you could send him back today, build him up and get the extra year of control, and then call him back whenever you want and he's immediately the best starting pitcher we have.

I guess what I am thinking is that Contreras has a hard limit of innings he can throw this year, and is completely dominant so far. We are a better team if we can get solid piggyback situations between Brubaker+Contreras and Thompson+Peters if the other starters can hold their own enough so that the bullpen doesn't get too taxed. It doesn't seem out of the question that you could have Contreras do this for 4-5 more times through to the end of May, which limits his innings somewhat, and then send him down for the # of days necessary / 2-3 starts (which in AAA is effectively 21 days assuming you just start him once a series). Then he can come back mid-summer and be put into the rotation and just let loose, and you shut him down when necessary later on, this way avoiding any kind of back-and-forth situation.

Back of napkin math: he currently has 8 innings. Let's say 6 more appearances to get to late May = 22 innings (30) + AAA for 3 starts = 18 innings (48). He pitched 54 last year, so I would guess 110-120 is a conservative estimate of what we want in 2022. If we assume we might have him only go 5 IP a few times as part of the management, then that's maybe 12-13 starts, which if he is back and starting in MLB by mid/late-June, probably gets you close enough to September before you shut him down for the season, assuming all goes well etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: td_ice
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad