Radko Gudas: The BIGGEST NHL Rat NO ONE Talks About

[Golden_Jet]

Since you didn't deny what I previously said, I'm going to assume what I said was true.

Lmao No it’s false, and it’s pointless, debating with you and your blue goggles.

 

[HofT]

But you can’t interpret them correctly.


That happens when you see how many PPs leafs got compared to Florida.

In which way? What am I misinterpreting?

 

[Tobias Kahun]

You're completely ignoring the rest of my post. You're making it sound like I'm just talking the net which is not true lol

I'm bringing up the rule and I'm talking about all 3 of the criteria for a charge.
Here: "as a result of distance traveled", "violently check an opponent in any manner" "check into the boards, into the goal frame or in open ice."

Gudas checks those boxes.

So you think every 95% of body checks are considered charging?

 

[HockeyGuy1964]

42.1 Charging: "as a result of distance traveled", "violently check an opponent in any manner" "check into the boards, into the goal frame or in open ice."

Gudas made a play, and that's travelling from a distance, crouching down and locking onto Aston-Reese's blindside where he eventually checks Aston-Reese who violently goes into the goal frame spine first. I call it violent cause he came at a distance at a fast pace and the net was dislodged. That's what happened. That's the result.

Right, not shoulder to shoulder. Gudas was never parallel with Aston-Reese. He got him in the chest.

Get lost troll.

 

[HofT]

So you think every 95% of body checks are considered charging?

If there was distance travelled and is violent enough, of course. That's the rule.

Get lost troll.

I think you need a timeout lol. Sorry you can't handle the rule.

 

[Beezeral]

If there was distance travelled and is violent enough, of course. That's the rule.


I think you need a timeout lol. Sorry you can't handle the rule.

Your definition of distance traveled must be 2 feet or something.

Until Nylander scored in overtime not once did the Leafs have a lead during the whole game.

I'm sure if the Leafs were in the Panthers situation and blew a 4-2 lead and our fans complained about one specific penalty, you would be one of the first people to say get over it.

Panthers fans have more gripes than just one bad call. There were multiple bad/missed calls. The vast majority of them favored the leafs. Keep thinking the Leafs only had 3 penalty worthy infractions last night. It's comical.

 

[HofT]

Your definition of distance traveled must be 2 feet or something.

No, my definition would be moving at a significant pace and there's enough time to "charge" the hit.

 

[Master P]

Get lost troll.

Just ignore it. The account is 15 years old and has hardly any posts.

 

[Tobias Kahun]

How do you charge up a hit with 0 strides.

You’re allowed to glide into hits

No, my definition would be moving at a significant pace and there's enough time to "charge" the hit.

You ever wonder why you’re the only one on this island of interpretation?

 

[Petrus]

I’ve watched the replay multiple times and it seems like a regular hit to me. But what do I know!

 

[BayStBullies]

It is hard to follow this team. It is like being on a squad in a video game where the matchmaking is so bad that your squad constantly runs into bad situations and pulls you with it. Not all of us condone these nutcases. The officiating in that game was bad, but favoured the Leafs. It is fair to say that, or else you lose credence in the overwhelming cases where it doesn't.

 

[HofT]

How do you charge up a hit with 0 strides.

You’re allowed to glide into hits


You ever wonder why you’re the only one on this island of interpretation?

From Gudas position above the hashmarks, he makes about 2-3 strides. Like Gudas is just in an awful defensive position here lol He got caught.

Yes, you're allowed to glide into hits. But not at a fast pace starting from a distance and if its violent enough.

And I'm not the only one. But even if I was, I'm a lone cowboy.

 

[TheImpatientPanther]

So yes? Giving an in division teams rebuild a shot in the ass like you guys are is something I thought died with Burke. See you in 15-20 years when you guys have your return to relevancy....for a season.

Your team haven't won a series in nearly 2 decades....every non Leaf fan laughs at your team and fan base.

 

[Golden_Jet]

No, my definition would be moving at a significant pace and there's enough time to "charge" the hit.

Couple of strides then glides into him.

 

[HofT]

Just ignore it. The account is 15 years old and has hardly any posts.

They can't ignore because they know my point is accurate according to the literal definition of the rule.

 

[HofT]

Couple of strides then glides into him.

For sure

 

[Neil Racki]

Why are Leafs fans keeping this embarrassment alive with incessant repetitive posts?

All it does is highlight how Gudas punked one of your guys and Leafs getting beneficial treatment.

But carry on ...

 

[TheBeastCoast]

Your team haven't won a series in nearly 2 decades....every non Leaf fan laughs at your team and fan base.

And most people forget your team is in the league until the day before they play you.

 

[TheImpatientPanther]

And most people forget your team is in the league until the day before they play you.

Which makes my point even more embarrassing for your team and fanbase.

 

[TheBeastCoast]

Which makes my point even more embarrassing for your team and fanbase.

Doesn't change anything for me. I could give a f*** what you or anyone else thinks about the Leafs. I would have tapped out long ago if I did. You are obsessed with a team whose fans your team literally doesn't even register with. You have just taken the long route to being a fan yourself.

 

[ACC1224]

Your team haven't won a series in nearly 2 decades....every non Leaf fan laughs at your team and fan base.

"Stupid is as stupid does"

 

[Beezeral]

View attachment 637332
From Gudas position above the hashmarks, he makes about 2-3 strides. Like Gudas is just in an awful defensive position here lol He got caught.

Yes, you're allowed to glide into hits. But not at a fast pace starting from a distance and if its violent enough.

And I'm not the only one. But even if I was, I'm a lone cowboy.

your reverse angle is clear as day that Gudas is reaching for the puck and not loading up for a hit.

 

[HofT]

your reverse angle is clear as day that Gudas is reaching for the puck and not loading up for a hit.

As I said before I can describe it as him crouching and targeting Aston-Reese to make the hit. And the results speak for itself. That's my proof. He lays an aggressive hit instead of the puck. That's just what it is. That's what happened.

You can't provide proof because he doesn't touch the puck in any significant way. Like even for the NHL's sake, if they were to call this back they would need to show proof. And again, Gudas does not touch the puck in any significant way to influence its trajectory. The puck stays in inertia along with Aston-Reese.

 

[GrizzGreen]

Leafs should have signed him.

 

[AvroArrow]

I’m still looking for the “charging“ on that play…

It was the part when he was taking multiple strides and leaving his feet and hitting the guy into the net aka the entire play.