He's been better under Boudreau, but lets face it, he's very much sheltered.We're not trading a #1 defenseman, even if he isn't quite on the level of Makar. He's the sort of player you build around, not trade away for uncertainties.
The 'he's bad defensively' line is incorrect too. Sure, offense is where he really thrives, but he's been solid all over the ice this year. He's +9 on a team that was a mess until Boudreau came in. Last season's Canucks were a tire fire, and his performance wasn't representative of who he is as a player.
whatHe’s not good enough defensively but is still really good offensively (Tyson Barrie 2.0 it looks like), but he’s still got a lot of value. Knowing he isn’t a true #1, would the package he could bring to Vancouver be more valuable to them going forward than if they were to keep him?
No he's not. He plays over 25 mins a game in all situations.He's been better under Boudreau, but lets face it, he's very much sheltered.
how is he sheltered? Bruce even has him on the PK now and he actually seems pretty decent at itHe's been better under Boudreau, but lets face it, he's very much sheltered.
Avs fan want threads to discredit Hughes for any reason because insecurities. Boom they got one. Now /threadCanucks fans are going to demand the moon
He isn't worth close to the moon
No deal will be agreed upon. Bam thread closed.
Lol. This is a pretty bad take. Have you checked his stats or watched him play one game this year? He has been good defensively and is absolutely a #1 at this point. He is the only truly untouchably player on the Canucks roster imo.
HahahaHe’s not good enough defensively but is still really good offensively (Tyson Barrie 2.0 it looks like), but he’s still got a lot of value. Knowing he isn’t a true #1, would the package he could bring to Vancouver be more valuable to them going forward than if they were to keep him?
He’s not good enough defensively but is still really good offensively (Tyson Barrie 2.0 it looks like), but he’s still got a lot of value. Knowing he isn’t a true #1, would the package he could bring to Vancouver be more valuable to them going forward than if they were to keep him?
One of the most remarkably transparent troll threads I can remember on HF. Congrats.
He's been better under Boudreau, but lets face it, he's very much sheltered.
He’s not good enough defensively but is still really good offensively (Tyson Barrie 2.0 it looks like), but he’s still got a lot of value. Knowing he isn’t a true #1, would the package he could bring to Vancouver be more valuable to them going forward than if they were to keep him?
Not to mention he would have made US olympics team if NHL players would have gone. The OP is out to lunch and this seems like a low key troll thread to get a reaction.Lol. This is a pretty bad take. Have you checked his stats or watched him play one game this year? He has been good defensively and is absolutely a #1 at this point. He is the only truly untouchably player on the Canucks roster imo.
I think you already show lack of hockey knowledge just by posting here about HughesRyan Graves led the NHL in plus/minus one year, let’s not use that as any supporting evidence to suggest a player is good defensively. It’s a bad stat.
I bet if Avs won the cup, this guy would be the first on here making a thread regarding Hughes playing bad defense and not about Avs winning the cup.i love that hughes lives in the head of so many avs fans as a focal point of their insecurities. it's like he is preordained to crush their dreams one day.
The Avs fans discuss about Hughes so much here that Canucks fans dont even need to create a thread for him in the Canucks sectionIt is the wildest phenomenon
Vancouver doesnt even discuss Hughes, like literally in the Vancouver section, his thread is is over a month old.
and the last 5 threads about hughes all involve colorado fans