Player Discussion Quinn Hughes, Pt. VII

David71

Registered User
Dec 27, 2008
17,908
1,928
vancouver
Hes starting to gas badly at the end of the games. Wonder how long he can sustain this level of playing time
he cant. with hronek outs ITS not sustainable. hes bound to get hurt at some point and the defense will be very very ugly. myers/juulsen,friedman,soucy deharnais branstrom. playing 28 mins/night is not good in the long run.
 

tantalum

Hope for the best. Expect the worst
Sponsor
Apr 2, 2002
25,583
14,895
Missouri
8th in overall ice per game. The same amount as every other #1 D-man in the league. he's the best D-man in the world. He is going to play the minutes that the other best D-men in the world play.

He will play more when the team is chasing the game which has happened a lot this year. But the solution to them always chasing the game has little to do with his play. It's to have everyone else going at puck drop so they can get the lead.

In the end he's averaged just shy of 25 minutes a game this year. That happens to be the same average icetime he's had for the last 250 games he's played. His work load is managed in other ways...more off days.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AlainVigneaultsGum

geebster

Registered User
Sponsor
Oct 26, 2019
2,142
3,336
8th in overall ice per game. The same amount as every other #1 D-man in the league. he's the best D-man in the world. He is going to play the minutes that the other best D-men in the world play.

He will play more when the team is chasing the game which has happened a lot this year. But the solution to them always chasing the game has little to do with his play. It's to have everyone else going at puck drop so they can get the lead.

In the end he's averaged just shy of 25 minutes a game this year. That happens to be the same average icetime he's had for the last 250 games he's played. His work load is managed in other ways...more off days.
Sure over a large enough span it works out that way. Last few games he had increasingly become the only play driver and his shift lengths have gone up. Had 5 straight games over 27 mins with one at 31. Was only down on minutes yesterday because he was gone for a chunk of the first getting his face fixed. It's not all about minutes though, its about how hard those minutes are too.

The concern is if he's the main focus, playing 28 to 30 mins on the regular (recently), and the team is straight up sorry when he isn't out there. It's a recipe for failure. Quinn playing 28 minutes is nothing like any other defenseman playing 28. He has the puck way more than anyone else in the league, he skates constantly and hard, he takes cheapshots and physical pressure all over the ice. If we play him til the wheels fall off like EDM and McDavid we will regret it for years.

We need to either get a guy or spread minutes around with what we got. We also need Miller back badly so Petey isn't the only possession threat up front. Petey has been excellent (didnt do much yesterday but hes been on a tear) but we need a second line that can pressure teams. The overreliance on Hughes is going to bite us eventually.

For any other defenseman, the vast majority of their playing time is off the puck. For Quinn its all on puck, either he has it or he's pressuring or supporting the person who does. It's not all about minutes either we need to make his minutes easier. Have other people support better and carry the puck to take pressure off him both 5 on 5 and on the PP. Our entire PP is stand around and give it to Hughes and let him do it. Petey and him should be cycling and moving and causing chaos.
 

Breakers

Make Mirrored Visors Legal Again
Aug 5, 2014
23,153
21,929
Denver Colorado
Started arguing with someone on a main board, but man, Hughes vs. Makar for Norris should not even be close. Hughes has been FAR more impactful. The on/off ice splits and WOWYs are enormous.

Here's Makar with Mackinnon: 65% scoring chance share
Makar without Mackinnon: 50%

Hughes with Miller: 63%
Hughes with Petey: 63%
Hughes without Miller: 65%
Hughes without Petey: 62%

It's literally all Hughes. On Colorado, it's Mackinnon that's the driver.

Mackinnon is the most aggressive attacking forward in the league
guy has clips yelling at teammates to "get the frank outta the way"

Like McDavid attacks, but he resets and is more calculating in the neutral zone waiting for teammates.

Mackinnon is yelling for the puck and doesn't not want to allow the defense to change, and isnt waiting for teammates
 

Anthem

Registered User
Dec 9, 2024
63
52
8th in overall ice per game. The same amount as every other #1 D-man in the league. he's the best D-man in the world. He is going to play the minutes that the other best D-men in the world play.

He will play more when the team is chasing the game which has happened a lot this year. But the solution to them always chasing the game has little to do with his play. It's to have everyone else going at puck drop so they can get the lead.

In the end he's averaged just shy of 25 minutes a game this year. That happens to be the same average icetime he's had for the last 250 games he's played. His work load is managed in other ways...more off days.
Thed problem isn't the average, it's the workload in the last few games.

That said, the last 5 games the only guys average 26+ a night are Werenski/Makar/Hughes/Seider/Josi.

The elite of the league + poor overworked Seider.

Leaning on your best players is not a Canucks only problem.

Still one they need to solve.

Mackinnon is the most aggressive attacking forward in the league
guy has clips yelling at teammates to "get the frank outta the way"

Like McDavid attacks, but he resets and is more calculating in the neutral zone waiting for teammates.

Mackinnon is yelling for the puck and doesn't not want to allow the defense to change, and isnt waiting for teammates
So many highlights of Makar doing a simple pass to Mack in their half of the neutral zone and getting a free primary assist.

Something interesting is that both Mack and Makar have shit posession numbers without each other (~40 xG%) but then they are just dynamite together.

I just don't get the avs. Are they are a great team with shitty goaltending or a mid team with shitty goaltending and 3 outstanding elite talents.

If they are actually good why are Mack and Makar so lost without each other?
 

SillyRabbit

Trix Are For Kids
Jan 3, 2006
9,130
9,192
How do you guys think Hughes will perform at the Four Nations tournament?

I'd expect him to be getting lots of PP minutes. PP1 will probably look something like:

Tkachuk-Eichel-J.Hughes
Q.Hughes-Matthews

Hughes is used to doing a lot of the heavy lifting himself, I wonder what that translates to when he has so much talent around him.

It's possible we see him try to do a bit too much himself, or overcompensate and defer too much to others. Hope he shines but you never know.
 

Bjornar Moxnes

Fordi fellesskap fungerer
Oct 16, 2016
12,440
4,922
Troms og Finnmark
Thed problem isn't the average, it's the workload in the last few games.

That said, the last 5 games the only guys average 26+ a night are Werenski/Makar/Hughes/Seider/Josi.

The elite of the league + poor overworked Seider.

Leaning on your best players is not a Canucks only problem.

Still one they need to solve.


So many highlights of Makar doing a simple pass to Mack in their half of the neutral zone and getting a free primary assist.

Something interesting is that both Mack and Makar have shit posession numbers without each other (~40 xG%) but then they are just dynamite together.

I just don't get the avs. Are they are a great team with shitty goaltending or a mid team with shitty goaltending and 3 outstanding elite talents.

If they are actually good why are Mack and Makar so lost without each other?
Avs have pretty awful depth. Toews has also shown a massive regression this season, could look like an ugly contract going forward.
 

Anthem

Registered User
Dec 9, 2024
63
52
How do you guys think Hughes will perform at the Four Nations tournament?

I'd expect him to be getting lots of PP minutes. PP1 will probably look something like:

Tkachuk-Eichel-J.Hughes
Q.Hughes-Matthews

Hughes is used to doing a lot of the heavy lifting himself, I wonder what that translates to when he has so much talent around him.

It's possible we see him try to do a bit too much himself, or overcompensate and defer too much to others. Hope he shines but you never know.
Best player on the ice every game he plays.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nergish

tantalum

Hope for the best. Expect the worst
Sponsor
Apr 2, 2002
25,583
14,895
Missouri
Thed problem isn't the average, it's the workload in the last few games.

That said, the last 5 games the only guys average 26+ a night are Werenski/Makar/Hughes/Seider/Josi.

The elite of the league + poor overworked Seider.

Leaning on your best players is not a Canucks only problem.

Still one they need to solve.
If you have one of the best players in the world you play your best player in the world and do so a lot. The list you have is #1 D-men. It's not anything unusual.

This is why the coaching staff has Hughes take days off. That is how you manage the workload.
 

Crabe

Registered User
Jul 28, 2011
32
22
Not many players who take control of a game like this. What we're seeing is something very special. Is Hughes more dominant than McDavid?? A year ago I would have said obviously not...
 

vadim sharifijanov

Registered User
Oct 10, 2007
29,902
18,185
way to find the black cloud dude

1734026740964.gif
 

BoHorvat 53

What's a god to a Kane
Dec 9, 2014
4,050
2,341
Shesterkin has not been good this season.

Answer to your question is yes. QH is a top5 player in the league. Last season and this.

McDavid aside (and maybe MacKinnon) I wouldn't take any other player in the league over him.

Have no issues if we end up making him the highest paid player in the league, as long as it's for 8 years.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad